Last week, something improbable happened: An international organization kicked China out and named a Taiwanese as its next president for 2021 to 2023. Jack Li (李友專) had over the past decade been nominated several times to be president of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA), but each time China allegedly rallied its allies to block the move.
Taiwan has also been chosen to host the 2023 MedInfo conference, one of the largest and most prestigious events in the medical informatics field. While the IMIA is by no means a household name like the WHO or the UN, it has been around for 30 years and has 61 member nations and 51 academic institutes.
China’s expulsion was not even a contested issue — 28 members voted in favor of the motion, one voted against and 10 abstained. Apparently, it was booted for “a series of improprieties,” such as changing the venue of an assembly four times when it was host and failure to pay its fees, the Taipei Times reported on Saturday last week.
Curiously, the Taiwan Association for Medical Informatics posted a clarification on its Web site on Saturday asserting that China being kicked out and Li being elected president, as well as Taiwan gaining the right to host the conference, were completely unrelated. It went on to state that China had always supported Taiwan’s endeavors and ambitions within the organization, and had never interfered with Li’s presidential bids.
It is naive to think that China was kicked out to make room for Taiwan, but given China’s behavior toward Taiwan on all levels of international interaction, down to harmless cultural festivals, it seems extremely unlikely that China would support a Taiwanese as president and root for Taiwan to host a major event.
That Li became president immediately upon China’s expulsion is also telling. Furthermore, the Central News Agency cited Li as saying that he never thought he would have this chance amid Chinese pressure.
However, no matter how Taiwan earned this “victory,” it is worth celebrating in light of all the international setbacks it has suffered due to ramped up Chinese pressure over the past several years.
Most of Taiwan’s victories on the international stage have been related to democracy, human rights and free speech — areas in which China blatantly fails. From Reporters Without Borders and the Oslo Freedom Forum to the Federation of International Human Rights Museums earlier this month, international organizations have specifically chosen to set up shop in Taiwan for obvious reasons.
However, the IMIA development is more than just about “winning” against China. Taiwan would not get to be such a prominent member of an organization if it did not have the skills to back it up. The nation has an excellent electronic medical records system with extensive data through its world-class National Health Insurance program. It is also known for leveraging its cutting-edge information technology capabilities to establish a wide array of smart health products and solutions. As part of its soft power diplomacy, Taiwan has been sharing these capabilities with other nations, and such an achievement is even more worthy of celebration than the recognition of the nation’s often overlooked accomplishments.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS