Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) was formally established on Tuesday last week. The date, Aug. 6, was chosen because it is Ko’s birthday and is also thought to be the birthday of Japanese colonial-era democracy pioneer Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水).
Ko reveres Chiang and knows that Taiwanese have great respect for him.
Chiang was a physician who was politically active, and the same is true of Ko, so Ko would like to be Chiang’s reincarnation. That is also why Ko’s new party has adopted the same name as the party that Chiang established in 1927, which was disbanded in 1931.
However, Ko has not gained the support of Chiang’s descendants. Grandson Chiang Chao-gen (蔣朝根) and great-granddaughter Chung Fa-lan (鍾法蘭) do not want Ko to use the name of his party.
Chung even said that Ko should “get lost and drop dead.”
She said that Ko should stop acting as if he were somehow related to Chiang Wei-shui and stop trying to take advantage of her great-grandfather.
That is why, at the party’s founding conference, Ko avoided any mention of Chiang Wei-shui for fear of stirring up further trouble. The carefully selected date was thus rendered partially meaningless and the party’s “opening move” was a failure.
Some of Ko’s relatives and close friends were present at the party’s founding conference, including his parents and his respected teacher, surgeon Chu Shu-hsun (朱樹勳).
Politicians in attendance included former Tainan County commissioner Su Huang-chih, and former legislators Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩) of Hsinchu County, Lisa Huang (黃文玲) of Changhua County and Chi Kuo-tung (紀國棟) from Taichung — none of whom are current major players. The absence of political big shots made the conference a bit of a let down.
Ko made his name as a “political novice” who took an “unconventional path,” but now that he has established his own party, everyone will judge him by conventional standards.
A founding conference should be a bustling celebration packed with dignitaries, but this one looked more like a convention of frustrated political has-beens and felt rather somber.
Even if the organizers were not looking for politicians to take part, they could have brought in some prominent figures from the world of art and literature like Cloud Gate Dance Theatre founder Lin Hwai-min (林懷民) or painter and writer Chiang Xun (蔣勳).
They could also have senior figures from the medical sector to take part, along with prominent businesspeople. This could have highlighted Ko’s wide range of connections that transcends political divides, but it did not work out that way.
Unsurprisingly, Ko was elected as chairman of the TPP. As to the party’s central committee, its members are Taipei Culture Foundation deputy chief executive Chang Yi-san (張益贍), who is a member of the Democratic Progressive Party; former Vibo Telecom chief executive officer George Chou (周鐘麒); South Taiwan Travel Industry Alliance general convener Frank Lin (林富男); and architect Wally Huang (黃胤為). None of these people are well-known to the public.
The party has a central review committee, whose elected members are National Taiwan University of Arts professor Weber Lai (賴祥蔚); Tsai Yi-lun (蔡易倫), who is secretary to Taipei City Government adviser and close Ko associate Tsai Pi-ru (蔡壁如); Hsinchu Science Park engineer Lai Chun-ming (賴俊銘); local cultural association chairman Lai Cheng-lung (賴正龍); and retired professor Yang Hsing-chang (楊行昌).
Ko said in his conference speech that “Taiwan is us, and we are the people.” He added that he hoped the foundation of the TPP would give people another choice besides the pan-blue and pan-green political camps.
However, apart from transcending the blue-green divide, it is hard to see what ideas the party has been organized around or what path it is set to follow.
Ko said that his core ideology is aimed at “what benefits Taiwan as a whole, and what provides the greatest well-being for the public, so that people can live a little better.”
However, it is not clear how he intends to achieve this or what specific policies he proposes. So far, everything he has said is just a lot of hot air.
The TPP unveiled its party charter, the first chapter of which is headed “general principles,” and the first article of the first chapter says that the TPP can be called the “People’s Party” (民眾黨) for short.
Prior to the conference, the media had been abbreviating the party’s name in another way that happens to sound like the Chinese name of former Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), who was the runner-up in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential primary.
It is widely thought that Ko will collaborate with Gou, and Ko has said that Gou is the best person to become Taiwan’s next president.
The similarity between the party’s alternative abbreviated title and Gou’s name seemed like a heavenly blessing for future cooperation between Ko and Gou, but now people know that the party charter specifies a different abbreviation.
It is rare for a party to be so specific about this point in its charter. Why does Ko not want to use the abbreviation that the media had been using? Could it be that he wants to avoid the association with Gou? Does this mean that the expected cooperation between the two will not come to pass?
Another question is whether Gou might delay his expected meeting with Ko after seeing his new party’s rather unimpressive founding conference. Notably, Weber Lai is closely associated with the Want Want China Times Media Group, which Gou thoroughly dislikes.
In view of all this, it remains to be seen whether Ko and Gou will really work together after all.
Judging by the scene at the conference, most of the people who joined the party are Taipei City Government employees. It looks like a case of “inbreeding” with everyone being in the same “bubble,” and it shows how hastily the party has been cobbled together.
That raises the question of how the TPP will go about attracting a more diverse membership.
Ko said in his speech that the TPP is being established to “put into practice the ideals of honesty and integrity and of changing the political culture.”
However, the day before the conference, Ko, referring to President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), said: “Everyone around you is corrupt.”
This remark is widely seen as a baseless accusation without a shred of evidence to back it up, but Ko refuses to apologize. This seems somewhat at variance with his stated purpose of “honesty and integrity.”
Could this really be what Ko means by “changing the political culture?”
Fan Shih-ping is a professor in National Taiwan University’s Graduate Institute of Political Science.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS