On an August afternoon in 1995, John Hron, a defiant anti-racist, was tortured and beaten to death by neo-Nazi skinheads beside a picturesque lake near his home town of Kode in Kungalv, Sweden. He was 14.
Neo-Nazis were gaining a foothold in Kungalv, an industrial borough of 20,000 people on the west coast, for the first time since World War II. Sweden’s economy had stuttered in the early 1990s after a financial crisis and its politics were in flux.
Twenty-four years later, Sweden’s neo-Nazis are again targeting Muslims and Jews, buoyed by anti-immigrant sentiment in the country that has seen the radical nationalist Sweden Democrats make electoral gains.
Illustration: Mountain People
After terrorists attacked two mosques in New Zealand in March, killing 50, the massacre was hailed by members of the Nordic Resistance Movement, an openly Nazi group.
On Wednesday last week, the group marched in uniforms through Kungalv city, which it is targeting because of its historical links to Sweden’s war-time Nazis.
Yet Kungalv has changed over the past two decades. Galvanised by Hron’s murder, the municipality has developed a quietly successful initiative to prevent recruitment of young people by racists.
After the tragedy, Kungalv hired Christer Mattsson, a local teacher and researcher, to plan its response.
He said that the problem was not Kungalv as a whole, but small parts of it: “Hate is always local.”
So he and his coresearchers created the Tolerance Project, starting with Ytterby, a large school where the neo-Nazis were very active.
“Back then we had a big problem at the school, a lot of trouble with neo-Nazis in the neighborhood,” said Therese Kraffke, the school’s head teacher.
In 2001, Kraffke, Mattsson and other teachers started to hold workshops with a mixed group of girls aged 14 to 16, including those who hung out with the skinheads.
“The skinhead core was mainly boys,” Kraffke said. “We reasoned that if the girls stopped supporting them, they wouldn’t have people around them.”
The culmination of the project was a week-long trip to significant Holocaust sites in Poland for which students had to hand over their phones, ensuring their attention was concentrated on their experience and the group around them.
The visit encouraged each student to think about who they were, what shaped their attitudes and how to deal with emotions such as anger.
Madeleine, who asked that her surname not be used, was one of the first girls to participate.
Aged 14, Madeleine had started to shave her head, and wear boots and a bomber jacket just like the neo-Nazis. She scrawled SS symbols around Kungalv and hung out with white supremacists, drinking and smoking.
“It was just a cool thing, but it was starting to mean something: I started yelling at people with dark skin, being really aggressive,” she said.
“In my group, to be angry and hateful was seen as good thing — my identity was the hard girl who is angry all the time,” Madeleine said.
“The climate was so bad at the school against black people, Muslims and Jews. The white people were the ‘right’ people,” she said.
As part of the Tolerance Project, Madeleine started to mix with girls from other backgrounds. They talked about why people hate each other and learned about the Holocaust.
During her six months on the project, she found herself for the first time among people who listened to her and respected her.
“I think about what would have happened to me without that experience. I would probably be a Nazi’s girlfriend today,” said Madeleine, now 31 and a teaching assistant. “I didn’t have the network around me to get out of it.”
The approach has become known as the “Kungalv model” for tackling racism among teenagers, and its techniques are practiced in more than 60 schools in Sweden. In Kungalv itself, the program has inoculated a generation of young people against right-wing extremism.
Loa Ek took part in the Tolerance Project in 2012. She was 14 and by her own admission a difficult child who was skipping classes and failing exams.
“It was hard for me to keep my mouth shut at first, but I calmed down — nobody judged me,” Ek, 21, said.
“It was a safe space — it helped me to understand and control myself. We learned how easy it is to manipulate people through racism,” she said.
Ek’s outspoken nature now has other targets.
“It irritates me so much when people don’t like immigrants. I tell them to go read some books,” she said.
Breaking down the barriers between groups of school students is key to success, said Maarten van Zalk, professor of developmental psychology at the University of Osnabruck in Germany, whose research has measured the effect of the Kungalv model on pupils’ outlook and opinions.
“When you are part of a racist subculture, it is unlikely you will interact with immigrant students,” he said.
“With the Tolerance Project they are strongly encouraged to engage, and with the engagement they break the circle. The more they break that circle, the higher the level of tolerance,” Zalk said.
A 2013 study backed by diversity and anti-racism organizations estimated that the economic benefits of the project, measured in terms of preventing damage to society caused by neo-Nazi gangs, outweighed the investment required by a factor of 20.
A study by a researcher at Birmingham University last year concluded that the project had led to “an increased sense of security, less vulnerability, and most important of all, less hatred.”
Cristine Lysell, who is now in charge of upper secondary school education for Kungalv council, saw for herself the changes at Ytterby school, where she was a teacher when the neo-Nazis were at their height.
“The racism started to disappear — it became more calm and students started to react when they heard people express racist views,” Lysell said.
“Everyone in the school was standing up for integration. Then we began to realize the hard work was paying off,” she said.
Today the neo-Nazis do not recruit from Ytterby school, Kraffke said.
“They are strong here, their leader lives nearby, but they don’t target the school, they have nothing to get from us,” she said.
A student from a neighboring school was so moved by her experience of the Tolerance Project that she and some friends organized a memorial concert for John Hron, 20 years after his death. About 5,000 people took part.
“We called it Together for Kungalv — instead of saying we hate the racists, we wanted a message that was positive and inclusive,” said Louise Eklund, now 21.
“We wanted to show a society where everyone can feel safe and happy, and live their lives, where we can understand that people are different,” Eklund said.
In 2015, the project’s success led to the establishment of the Segerstedt Institute at Gothenburg University, with the aim of developing and spreading the Kungalv model. The institute trains teachers and social workers to apply the methodology in their own environments, tailoring it to the specifics of youth culture and style.
“Doing so requires a highly complex, situated knowledge, the understanding of the local context — you have to be part of the fabric,” said Mattsson, who now runs the institute.
Each year, more than 800 Swedish school students go through the Kungalv model, but nobody should be tempted to think the work has been done and the problem is retreating, Mattsson said.
“If we stop doing this job, the racism will resurface in a different form in a year, five or 10 years, we don’t know,” he said.
“Racism is not something you can get rid of — it is an ongoing battle,” Mattsson added.
For Madeleine, neo-Nazi marches such as today’s are not the only reason the Kungalv model remains so necessary.
“When Notre Dame cathedral was burning, on Facebook [people] started blaming Muslims straight away. Everyday racism is growing in the whole of Sweden,” she said.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization