What has been the worst foreign-policy decision by US President Donald Trump’s administration?
Withdrawing from the Paris Agreement was bad. Pulling out of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal sent a signal that the US does not honor international agreements signed by previous administrations.
More recently, the US government’s successful intimidation of the International Criminal Court could have dire consequences for global governance and world peace.
However, Trump’s worst decision of all has not received the attention it deserves.
With his sudden recognition on March 25 of Israel’s illegal annexation of the Golan Heights in 1981, Trump in his typical cavalier fashion abandoned a principle — the inadmissibility of acquiring territory by force — that has underpinned international stability since World War II.
His recognition of Israel’s annexation establishes a highly dangerous precedent for the Middle East and beyond.
After 1945, the world’s nations unanimously repudiated territorial expansion by force to discourage states from invading and occupying their weaker neighbors. Attempts to violate this principle — such as by Iraq in Kuwait, Russia in Ukraine, and Israel in East Jerusalem and the Golan — were universally condemned.
The principle was included in the preamble of UN Security Council Resolution 242 following the 1967 Six-Day War in the Middle East, during which Israel seized the Golan Heights from Syria. It has been a fundamental principle of international law since the mid-1990s.
US officials have tried to justify Trump’s decision by saying that Israel acquired the Golan Heights in a “defensive” war.
Furthermore, Syria is embroiled in a civil war, and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad does not deserve to get the land back, they say.
However, the defensive-war justification does not hold water. Western governments, international human-rights organizations and legal experts — including some from Israel — say that in prohibiting the acquisition of territory by force, international law makes no distinction between a defensive or offensive war.
This is mainly because both sides in a war can claim to be acting defensively. Whereas Israel maintains that it started the June 1967 war preemptively because it feared an assault from Egypt, Arabs dispute this and commonly refer to the conflict as an aggression against them.
Trump’s recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights is already having a destabilizing effect.
As soon as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu returned from Washington after the Golan decision, he began talking about annexing portions of the West Bank. Such a move would completely destroy the possibility of a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on a two-state solution.
Moreover, Trump’s decision has given other nations a green light to resolve territorial disputes with their neighbors by force. If acquiring territory through war is now legitimized, then it becomes much harder to object to Russia’s annexation of Crimea, Saudi Arabia’s claim to parts of Yemen or Iraq’s demand that Kuwait be its 19th district.
Numerous other countries in Africa, Asia and Europe might also feel more tempted to retake by force parts of neighboring countries to which they have some historic or tribal claim.
Finally, recognizing Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights could jeopardize international legal protections for the Syrian population there.
These include the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, which aims to protect civilians under belligerent military occupation until peace is restored and their territories relinquished by the conquering armies.
In particular, the convention prohibits an occupier from moving its civilian population into the occupied territories — hence all Israeli settlements are illegal under international law.
This was affirmed in a 2003 decision by the International Court of Justice regarding Israel’s construction of a wall deep in occupied Palestinian territory.
Moreover, an occupying power cannot legally take natural wealth, artifacts and resources from occupied areas, and annexation is completely prohibited.
For decades, successive US Democratic and Republican administrations, for all their support of Israel, refused to recognize unilateral Israeli actions in East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. They also insisted that Geneva Convention rules must apply.
However, the Trump administration has recklessly reversed this long-standing policy. It has denied the existence of an Israeli occupation, moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, recognized the illegal Israeli annexation of the Golan Heights and refused to discuss Netanyahu’s plans to annex parts of the West Bank.
Trump’s actions will hardly help the cause of the Israeli-Palestinian peace plan that the US is said to be preparing, nor will the effects of his recklessness regarding the Golan Heights be limited to the Middle East.
The most dangerous consequences of Trump’s worst foreign-policy decision might be yet to come.
Jonathan Kuttab is a cofounder of the independent Palestinian human rights organization Al-Haq in Ramallah, Palestine.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened. According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation. The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery. In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system
RSS