The calamitous fire at Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris has drawn worldwide attention to safeguarding heritage sites and improving building resilience. In the wake of this tragedy, people have donated more than 850 million euros (US$955.9 million) to conserve and rebuild the 850-year-old cathedral. French President Emmanuel Macron called the icon’s restoration the public’s resilience.
Taiwan had, as of the end of last year, 935 monuments and 1,450 listed buildings. They are protected under the Cultural Heritage Protection Act (文化資產保存法) in case of a disaster, such as a fire or earthquake. The safety of the structures are assessed, and they are reinforced and retrofitted to restore valuable historical buildings, preserve cultural heritage and ensure the public’s safety and well-being.
In late February last year, Deputy Minister of the Interior Hua Ching-chun (花敬群) budgeted NT$6.07 billion (US$196.7 million) for a four-year project to subsidize the examination and reinforcement of historical buildings’ earthquake resistance, and offer tax benefits and floor area concessions to spur building renovation.
The Cabinet has recognized the urgency of amending the Building Act (建築法) to regulate dangerous buildings.
Older buildings are not only damaged by external factors, such as natural disasters, but also by intrinsic failures. For example, an investigation into a magnitude 6.4 earthquake that hit southern Taiwan in 2016 — killing 117 people — determined that buildings collapsed partially due to building design and construction failures, as well as poor construction management.
The UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction’s definition of building codes says that they should regulate the design, construction and materials of buildings — both technically and functionally — to ensure that structures can withstand damage without collapsing to maintain public safety and well-being.
The construction industry is pushing for a new approach called “systemic project management” to enhance building quality and improve the resistance of design and construction to disasters. This includes incorporating intense periods of design and life-cycle planning to ensure quality assurance from the design phase to post-occupancy.
International organizations that promote sustainable built environments, such as the Building Research Establishment and the US Green Building Council, recommend incorporating intense periods of design with the project design and delivery consultation right from the concept stage of construction projects.
These advocates suggest early design and construction risk assessments, early consideration of procurement and supply chains, and early stakeholder consultations to ensure smooth and successful delivery of project requirements and construction quality assurance.
Life-cycle planning integrates whole life value with the design and specifications of the early design phase, providing the design team with a better understanding of possible construction and servicing strategies, as well as the requirements to avoid potential risks.
Analytical tools such as real options help investors determine investment strategies during construction that could accommodate risk prevention and post-disaster restoration.
Transparent procurement and supply-chain management ensures step-by-step quality assurance. For example, the sources of the materials being specified for construction should be disclosed and certified.
Aftercare support in the post-construction phase assists asset managers in evaluating the root causes of damage so that designs can be optimized for refurbishments or similar construction projects.
A thorough examination and reconstruction program is necessary to improve building safety, but authorities must also adopt more in-depth systemic design and construction management from the earliest stages of a project to enhance building resilience.
This management strategy should not be limited to refurbishing older buildings, but should also include new construction projects — such as ongoing construction on the controversial build-operate-transfer project: the Taipei Dome — to ensure people’s safety and well-being in the built environment.
Ng Ming Shan is a LEED AP and registered architect in the UK and Switzerland, and a doctoral candidate in civil engineering at ETH Zurich.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS