The Legislative Yuan’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee last week passed a preliminary review of a bill to amend the Organic Act of the Examination Yuan (考試院組織法). The proposed amendment would slash the number of Examination Yuan members from 19 to three, reduce their terms from six years to four and add three new qualification requirements.
The draft bill also stipulates that new members would be forbidden from taking a job in China while holding office and any member who breached this regulation would forfeit their position.
The committee deliberated on whether to preserve the institution of meetings for all members, but was unable to come to a conclusion and agreed to set the issue aside for cross-caucus negotiations.
The Examination Yuan is a unique branch of government and a rare institution in other governments. Under the terms of the Constitution, the Examination Yuan is responsible for administering national civil servant examinations and civil servant appointments, providing training, and protecting civil servants’ rights and interests.
Most countries set up similar organizations as quangos with semi-independence, at most establishing an independent, department-level branch, such as the British Civil Service Board, whose status is comparable to the National Communications Commission, Central Election Commission or Fair Trade Commission.
The Examination Yuan’s powers are separated into three departmental-level executive branches: the Ministry of Examination, the Ministry of Civil Service and the Civil Service Protection and Training Commission.
The Ministry of Examination is primarily involved in designing and administering tests for the selection and promotion of civil servants, as well as special personnel. However, it also sets examinations for professional and technical personnel. None of these tasks require their own ministry-level administrative body.
The Ministry of Civil Service is mainly responsible for appointments, promotions, pensions and managing the retirement of civil servants.
The Executive Yuan has the Directorate-General of Personnel Administration, which — in certain areas — has functions that overlap with those of the Ministry of Civil Service, and the Civil Service Protection and Training Commission.
The National Academy of Civil Service, the Public Service Pension Fund Supervisory Board and the Public Service Pension Fund could all be brought under the umbrella of the Executive Yuan.
The primary task of Examination Yuan members is to attend its meetings and jointly chair review meetings. Their other main task is to act as chairpersons of examination committees and perform additional examination functions.
Given that there are fewer than 10 ministers without portfolio in the Cabinet, there can be no justification for having 19 Examination Yuan members.
As for the diversity of sources of examination committee chairmen, when I was minister of examination from 2004 to 2008, several Examination Yuan members refused to chair examination committees because of a legislative decision ending additional remuneration for such duties.
In the long-term, an amendment to the Constitution to abolish the Examination Yuan and redistribute its functions to other government departments is required.
In the short to medium term, reducing the number of members is reasonable and legally sound, although there is still room to negotiate how many members there should be.
Lin Chia-cheng is a former minister of examination.
Translated by Edward Jones
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
RSS