Ten years ago, I started researching Islam among the Uighurs. I spent my summers travelling around the Xinjiang region in western China.
I took long bus journeys through the desert to Kashgar, Yarkand and Kucha, slept on brick beds in family homes in remote villages, stopped off at Sufi shrines and visited many, many mosques.
My husband was working with me, and we dragged our kids along for the ride.
Illustration: Yusha
The kids were quite small and not at all interested in our boring interviews with imams, and I bribed them with treats.
I have a lot of photographs of them sitting in the dust outside mosques, faces smeared with ice cream, playing on their iPads.
It was an incredible time for mosque building in Xinjiang. After the Cultural Revolution, Uighur and Kazakh Muslims began to reconnect with their faith.
They resumed the traditional practices of pilgrimage and festivals at the shrines that lie deep in the Taklamakan Desert.
They began to learn about Islam in the wider world; people who could afford it travelled to Mecca for the hajj, and they began to rebuild their mosques.
As local communities grew richer they invested in bigger and more beautiful mosques; people crowded into them for Friday prayers, and they served as living symbols of community identity and pride.
I was reminded of all this by an image posted on Twitter last week.
Shawn Zhang (章聞韶), who did pioneering work revealing the existence of the massive network of detention camps for Muslims in Xinjiang, posted “before and after” satellite images of Keriya Mosque in the southern region of Hotan.
This towering architectural monument, thought to date back to 1237 and extensively renovated in the 1980s and 1990s, was photographed on a festival day in 2016 with thousands of worshippers spilling out on to the streets.
By last year the site where it had stood was a smooth patch of earth.
Observers have called China’s actions in Xinjiang the work of a “bulldozer state.”
It is an apt way to describe the ongoing work of destruction and remodeling of the region’s landscape and its people.
Mosques such as the one in Keriya were an early target of the campaign against “religious extremism.”
A reporter visited the eastern region of Qumul in 2017 and learned from local officials that more than 200 of the region’s 800 mosques had already been destroyed, with more than 500 scheduled for demolition last year.
Residents said that their local mosques had disappeared overnight, leveled without warning.
Mosques are not the only targets. Whole cities are being redesigned to facilitate maximum security and surveillance of the local population.
Sites of architectural interest such as the ancient city of Kashgar have been demolished and rebuilt to suit the needs of what the government proclaims will be a flourishing tourism industry in Xinjiang.
And it is not just the built heritage that is being destroyed. The bulldozer is also at work on communities, culture and people’s lives.
Everyday religious practice in Xinjiang has been effectively banned.
People are plagued by tech surveillance technology — checkpoints, facial recognition software, mobile phone scanners — and intrusive visits to family homes identify individuals as “prone to extremism.”
An official list of signs of extremism includes things such as refusing cigarettes and alcohol, not watching television and contacting people abroad.
Individuals identified in this way are sent to one of the many mass detention camps that have been constructed across the region over the past few years.
The camp system is veiled in secrecy, but researchers have amassed overwhelming evidence that more than 1 million Uighur and Kazakh Muslims have been incarcerated in them.
Inmates are subjected to a grueling regime of study and self-criticism underpinned by systematic brutality and torture.
We know about this because of countless acts of bravery by Uighurs and Kazakhs in the diaspora, who have chosen to speak out in spite of the very real fear that their loved ones will be punished for their actions.
The Chinese government is pursuing a vigorous propaganda campaign to persuade the international community that the camps are benign “vocational training centers” necessary to root out extremist violence and restore stability to the region.
Having seen so many of my own Uighur colleagues and friends disappear into the camps, I find this narrative insulting.
Those detained include academics, pop stars, comedians and poets: individuals who — like the bulldozed mosques — are symbols of Uighur identity and pride.
This creaming-off of the cultural elite — as my east European colleagues have noted — recalls the Stalinist terror of the 1930s.
We can also see this targeting of culture and identity in new restrictions on the use of Uighur language, compulsory lessons in Chinese, the promotion of interethnic marriage and the constant mobilization of ordinary Uighurs to demonstrate their patriotism by celebrating Chinese festivals and singing revolutionary songs.
This is no targeted response to violent extremism, but a concerted campaign to hollow out a whole culture, to terrorize a whole people and the Chinese government is using the West’s global war on terror to excuse its actions.
It is deeply disappointing, then, that the loudest critiques of China’s policies in Xinjiang have come from those on the US right in pursuit of their own agendas.
We need more voices from the left to speak out on this issue, placing the persecution of Xinjiang’s Muslims in the wider context of global Islamophobia.
Muslim countries, many of which are deeply indebted to China through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), have failed to condemn or have actively supported what China is doing in Xinjiang, but the track record of Western governments is not much better, as we saw with Italy’s recent backing of the BRI.
Companies, institutions and national governments that pay lip service to human rights need to be held to account for their actions if they choose to engage with the products, technologies and policy initiatives that enable what is going on in Xinjiang.
We owe it to the courageous people who are speaking out in the face of direct harassment by China’s security forces to keep this situation firmly on the international agenda.
Rachel Harris is reader in ethnomusicology at SOAS University of London and an expert in Uighur culture and religion.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
RSS