More than 50 days have passed since Jan. 30, when Yan Kefen (顏克芬), also known as Yan Bojun (顏伯鈞), and Liu Xinglian (劉興聯) — Chinese passport holders who are recognized as refugees by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) — were granted entry into Taiwan. This is probably the first time in the history of the Republic of China that UNHCR-recognized refugees have been admitted for the purpose of “short-term professional exchanges.”
What exactly do the regulations mean by “professional?” It means someone who has the ability and experience of engaging in a certain type of specialized work. In the case of these two men, especially Liu, the work they were engaged in when they were in China had to do with human rights — an occupation that could put them in considerable danger.
According to the two men’s public statements, before they fled to Thailand, they had been jailed in China for their human rights work. In 2015, Liu was secretary-general of China Rights Observer, a non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Wuhan. In 2013, Yan was a member of the New Citizen’s Movement and did publicity work for it.
From the perspective of the officials responsible for reviewing their application to enter Taiwan, this might have been the justification for allowing them to enter the country with visas stating the purpose of their visit as “short-term professional exchanges.”
On Sept. 27 last year, the two men, carrying their Chinese passports, boarded a China Airlines flight to Taiwan, where they were to transfer to a flight to Beijing, but after landing at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport, they applied to airport immigration for entry to Taiwan.
Several days later, Yan, who had resided for three years at the “refugee house” that I set up in Bangkok, telephoned me and other people to ask for urgent assistance.
Having confirmed their identities, and based on humanitarian principles and professional considerations, the authorities gave their approval for Liu and Yan to first fly to a third country, where they were quickly given visas for the purpose of “short-term professional exchanges” and were then able to fly back to Taiwan to be allowed entry as “professionals.”
Until then, they had been stranded in the airport’s departure hall for more than 120 days.
Late on Jan. 30, the two men, accompanied by a Mainland Affairs Council official and their guarantor, Chung Hua University associate professor Tseng Chien-yuan (曾建元), went to stay in a rented bungalow at a military dependents’ village. I had cleared this house out and reserved it for them almost two months before. Thus, they became guests in Taipei’s equivalent of the “refugee house” in Bangkok.
In preparation for their arrival, this new refugee house was equipped with a full range of daily necessities, such as bicycles, duvets, pillows, warm winter clothing, bathroom items and kitchenware. After moving in, they started living a free and normal life in Taiwan. I went with them by bicycle to buy fruit, vegetables and other food items at a traditional market. I also showed them how to make use of public libraries and university campuses. With a bit of help, they have gradually become accustomed to Taiwan.
Thankfully, their professional abilities were recognized by the Permanent Peace Partnership — an NGO whose mission is to promote “permanent peace” all over the world, and persuade people and organizations to sign their “Charter for Permanent Peace.”
Since the middle of last month, the two dissidents have been spending time at the office of the Permanent Peace Partnership, where they have concentrated on studying the charter. They have written several papers examining the charter’s origins and its connections with various nations’ theories of constitutional democracy.
One of their articles is titled “The Thoughts About Building a Contractual Society in Immanuel Kant’s Perpetual Peace.” Having entered Taiwan as professionals, they are indeed fulfilling that status by serving as short-term researchers in an NGO.
Liu had ailments before arriving in Taiwan. A health examination at Mackay Memorial Hospital in Taipei showed that he has post-stroke conditions, tumors, diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease and kidney disease that require urgent treatment.
Yan and Liu have been familiarizing themselves with Taiwan’s free society, where they can go about their lives free from fear. After all the trouble they went through before being admitted to Taiwan, they hope that they can start a new life here and that Taiwan can accept them as residents.
Taiwanese and government agencies should learn the answers to some questions, such as: What is a UNHCR-recognized refugee? What is a UNHCR refugee card, which the agency might issue after evaluating an applicant’s situation? How does the UNHCR operate in Southeast Asia?
In the spirit of freedom and democracy — of which Taiwanese are so proud — we should urge the legislature to place the draft law on refugees and political asylum on its agenda for deliberation and put it to a vote. When this law is enacted, Taiwan will have the legal basis required to accept UNHCR-recognized refugees who come here in search of political asylum.
Bei Ling is an exiled Chinese writer.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did
RSS