The government has again ramped up the penalties for drunk driving, showing determination to curb the problem — but it also raises the question of whether these increased penalties are working, as last year’s drunk driving cases dropped only slightly from 2017. However, it takes time to change a culture and habits after decades of overly lenient policies and court decisions — in the meantime, stiffer punishments should be enforced if the previous ones were not enough to stop the behavior.
The amendments passed yesterday to the Road Traffic Management and Penalty Act (道路交通管理處罰條例) should be applauded — especially one that would impose fines on adult passengers of a drunk driver. This would at least get passengers to think twice and increase the chance of someone convincing the driver not to drive. It is a choice to get into a drunk driver’s car and, as drunk driving is a crime, everyone in the vehicle should be punished.
However, the biggest item is probably the ignition interlock devices that repeat offenders could be forced to install in their vehicles. Yes, they can be expensive, but do not forget that fines greater than the price of the cheapest interlock device have failed to deter offenders. While it is possible to get a sober person to unlock the vehicle, there are ways to get around anything, so that should not be used as an argument against such devices. They are being used in countries such as the US and New Zealand, and have been proven to work.
Slightly increased penalties for drunken bicycle riders are also a good addition — even though the fines are not very high, many people often forget or are unaware that drunk bike riding is also illegal.
Ultimately, the problem can only be fixed through increased education and proper counseling. This area needs improvement as well — 12 hours of drunk driving prevention courses over two days for repeat offenders will not really make a difference in their lives.
The government earlier this month again tried scare tactics by having offenders take classes in a funeral home — which is a creative idea, but not everyone is scared of such things, nor would they be likely to even think of that experience when they are already drunk. The possibility of an offender in a fatal accident being charged with voluntary manslaughter, which has been brought up by some lawmakers, is much scarier than spending time in a funeral home.
The percentage of repeat offenders jumped from 27.2 percent in 2017 to 31.3 percent last year, showing that a big part of the problem is people who are not deterred by fines or easily re-educated. For example, in May 2017, a repeat drunk driver got so depressed after receiving the highest fine of NT$120,000 for his fourth offense that he got drunk, went driving and was arrested for a fifth offense. Alcoholism is a disease and cannot be cured by short-term fixes or scare tactics, just like clinical depression cannot be scared out of someone.
The content of these classes and the number of hours required, as well as increased counseling requirements for repeat offenders, should be the next step, and it looks like the government is working on it.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS