Although the US presidential election is more than 580 days away, early campaigning has required candidates to take hard-line stances on several policy litmus tests. For instance, candidates have been pressed to announce positions on how to count votes, alter the US Supreme Court and address climate change.
I am adding another question that every candidate should have to clearly answer: Will you support the “four musts” voiced by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文)?
The Taiwanese community, both in the US and on the island, must bind together to make this question a part of next year’s campaign. This election represents a fantastic opportunity to educate American voters on the threats facing Taiwan, to ensure that candidates are prepared to stand behind the island’s democratic values, and to build an even stronger relationship between the US and Taiwan.
Before I visited Taiwan as president of the Mosaic Taiwan program sponsored by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, I admittedly knew little about the island’s robust democratic values, wealth of technological expertise and commitment to remaining independent despite growing Chinese pressure. Too many American voters are in the same place I previously stood. They have not had the chance to climb Elephant Mountain (象山), shake hands with President Tsai and learn about Taiwanese democratic values.
Flying every voter to Taiwan to experience the same things is seemingly not possible, but in our connected world, supporters of Taiwan’s democracy have plenty of tools to increase Americans’ awareness of the island’s history, priorities and future.
Next year’s election marks the perfect window to update voters on why the American-Taiwan relationship is so important. Forty years ago, American voters understood the need to reinforce US ties with Taiwan. These voters helped lead their officials to sign the Taiwan Relations Act. Since then, all voters have been bombarded with messages on US-China relations, but few have delved into the details of the US-Taiwan relationship.
By placing the “four musts” on the minds of every voter and candidate, we can introduce Americans to Taiwan’s challenges and opportunities, while also testing the foreign policy acumen of candidates. Some candidates have little to no international experience. American voters and supporters of Taiwan’s democracy cannot accept a candidate who does not know how President Tsai plans to respond to China’s worrisome behavior. This simple question will quickly identify how closely a candidate has followed the cross-strait relationship.
As this question gets asked, US-Taiwan ties will grow stronger. More Americans will realize the tight connections between the two countries. More voters will recognize that support for Taiwan must be a part of any candidate’s foreign policy plans. More candidates will renew their commitment to upholding democratic values in Taiwan and around the world.
I, for one, am encouraging all my friends to add this question to their assessment of candidates. Please join me in using social media, word of mouth and even snail mail to get this question on the minds of American voters and candidates.
Kevin Frazier is a master’s of public policy candidate at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government who visited Taiwan through the Mosaic Taiwan 2018 fellowship program.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS