Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has drawn criticism at home and from Taiwanese expatriates over comments made during his current trip to the US, some of which might haunt him for years to come, as his “two sides of the [Taiwan] Strait are one family” remark has done.
Ko’s remarks, be they off-the cuff responses to reporters or those made in official speeches since he became mayor on Dec. 25, 2014, have prompted outrage so regularly that it has become the norm.
The problem with cherry-picking politicians’ statements to criticize — in this nation or elsewhere — is that all too often the context of the remark is lost or deliberately ignored.
For example, Ko’s infamous “one family” statement, for which he has repeatedly apologized, was first made at a Taipei-Shanghai twin city forum in 2015 and again in 2017, when the Taipei City Government was busying planning the 2017 Summer Universiade and hoping to have Chinese athletes attend.
His comments on Sunday to Taiwanese students in New York City that Taiwan’s political scene shows the nation is not governed by the law is likely to prove equally problematic.
Ko was talking about honesty and respect for the law when he was quoted as saying: “The law is meant for people to obey, not for people to refer to, but Taiwan has never been a country governed according to the rule of law ... we have never been a country of honesty” and “if people had to resign for lying, there would be no more politicians in Taipei.”
One can disagree with Ko’s comment about Taiwan not being governed by the rule of law, but recognize the kernel of truth in his comments about politicians and honesty.
After all, just last month former Hualien County commissioner Fu Kun-chi (?) was sentenced to two years and 10 months in prison by the Taiwan High Court in the final ruling in a case of insider trading and speculative stock trading dating back to 1997.
Lest we forget, then-independent lawmaker Lo Fu-chu (羅福助) became a member of the legislature’s judicial committee in 1998, along with other committee memberships, despite having been involved in organized crime for decades, being detained under “Operation Clean Sweep” for three years and running for elected office basically to avoid further prosecution.
Ko also told the students that many Taiwanese naively wish to see swift changes within two or three years, instead of slow, but steady progress — another truism.
While many people, including Ko supporters, hope that he might learn to exercise more care before he speaks, he has the right to speak his mind, and so it was disquieting to hear that the president of the Taiwan Association of America has urged the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and the US government to “exercise caution” if asked to approve further visits by Ko.
In a letter to AIT Chairman James Moriarty, the association said that Ko is moving closer to the Chinese Communist Party’s agenda, ignorant of strategic initiatives and trying to curry favor with China.
Were such warnings given during or after trips to the US, China and Britain by then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) when he strongly criticized then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his administration’s policies, or about remarks made by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — including those made on his overseas trips when he was still mayor of Taipei — or several other pan-blue camp politicians?
If people are unhappy with Ko’s comments about the rule of law or other topics, then they should prove him wrong, not seek to silence him. That is what being a democracy and respecting the right to free speech is all about.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS