As world leaders landed in Papua New Guinea (PNG) for a Pacific Rim summit, the welcome mat was especially big for China’s president.
A huge sign in the capital, Port Moresby, welcomed Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), picturing him gazing beneficently at Papua New Guinea’s leader, and his hotel was decked out with red Chinese lanterns.
China’s footprint is everywhere, from a showpiece boulevard and international convention center built with Chinese help to bus stop shelters that announce their origins with “China Aid” plaques.
Illustration: Yusha
On the eve of Xi’s arrival for a state visit and the APEC meeting, newspapers ran a full-page statement from the Chinese leader. It exhorted Pacific island nations to “set sail on a new voyage” of relations with China, which in the space of a generation has transformed from the world’s most populous backwater into a major economic power.
With both actions and words, Xi has a compelling message for the South Pacific’s fragile island states, long both propped up and pushed around by US ally Australia: They now have a choice of benefactors.
With the exception of Papua New Guinea, those island nations are not part of APEC, but the leaders of many of them traveled to Port Moresby and were to meet with Xi.
Meanwhile, the APEC meeting was Xi’s to dominate. Headline-hogging leaders such as Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump did not attend.
Trump’s stand-in, US Vice President Mike Pence, stayed in Cairns in Australia’s north and flew into Papua New Guinea each day. New Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, the nation’s fifth leader in five years, is barely known abroad.
“President Xi Jinping is a good friend of Papua New Guinea,” Papua New Guinean Prime Minister Peter O’Neill told reporters. “He has had a lot of engagement with Papua New Guinea and I’ve visited China 12 times in the last seven years.”
Pacific island nations, mostly tiny, remote and poor, rarely figure prominently on the world stage, but have for several years been diligently courted by Beijing as part of its global effort to finance infrastructure that advances its economic and diplomatic interests.
Papua New Guinea with about 8 million people is by far the most populous, and with its extensive tropical forests and oil and gas reserves, is an obvious target for economic exploitation.
Six of the 16 Pacific island states have diplomatic relations with Taiwan, a sizeable bloc within the rapidly dwindling number of nations that recognize the nation. Chinese aid and loans could flip those six into its camp.
A military foothold in the region would be an important geostrategic boost for China, though its purported desire for a base has so far been thwarted.
Beijing’s assistance comes without the oversight and conditions that Western nations and organizations such as the World Bank or the IMF impose. It is promising US$4 billion of finance to build the first national road network in Papua New Guinea, which could be transformative for the mountainous nation, but experts warn there could also be big costs later on: unsustainable debt, white elephant showpieces and social tensions from a growing Chinese diaspora.
“China’s engagement in infrastructure in PNG shouldn’t be discounted. It should be encouraged, but it needs to be closely monitored by the PNG government to make sure it’s effective over the long term,” said Jonathan Pryke, a Papua New Guinea expert at the Lowy Institute, a think tank in Sydney. “The benefits of these projects, because a lot of them are financed by loans, only come from enhanced economic output over a long time to be able to justify paying back these loans.”
“The history of infrastructure investment in PNG shows that too often there is not enough maintenance going on,” Pryke said. “There’s a build, neglect, rebuild paradigm in PNG as opposed to build and maintain, which is far more efficient.”
Some high-profile Chinese projects in Papua New Guinea have already run into problems.
A promised fish cannery has not materialized after several years and expansion of a port in Lae, the major commercial center, was botched and required significant rectification work.
Two of the Chinese state companies working in the nation, including the company responsible for the port expansion, were until recently blacklisted from World Bank-financed projects because of fraud or corruption.
Xi’s newspaper column asserted China is the biggest foreign investor in Papua New Guinea, a statement more aspirational than actual. Its involvement is currently dwarfed by the investment of a single company — ExxonMobil’s US$19 billion natural gas extraction and processing facility.
Australia, the former colonial power in Papua New Guinea, remains its largest donor of conventional foreign aid.
Its assistance, spread across the nation, and aimed at improving bare-bones public services and the capacity of government, is less visible, but its approach is shifting in response to China’s moves.
In September, the Australian government announced it would pay for what is typically a commercial venture — a high-speed undersea cable linking Australia, Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands, that promises to make the Internet and telecommunications in the two island nations faster, more reliable and less expensive.
Earlier this month, Australia announced more than US$2 billion of funding for infrastructure and trade finance aimed at Pacific island nations and also agreed to the joint development of a naval base in Papua New Guinea, heading off feared Chinese involvement.
It is also boosting its diplomatic presence, opening more embassies to be represented in every Pacific island state.
“The APEC meeting is shaping up to be a face-off between China and Australia for influence in the Pacific,” Human Rights Watch Australia director Elaine Pearson said.
That might seem a positive development for the region, but Pearson cautioned that competition for Papua New Guinea’s vast natural resources has in the past had little positive impact on the lives of its people.
“Sadly, exploitation of resources in PNG has fueled violent conflict, abuse and environmental devastation,” she said.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises