Shortly after US President Donald Trump announced in May that he would reimpose sanctions on Iran, the US Department of State began telling countries around the world the clock was ticking for them to cut oil purchases from the Islamic Republic to zero.
The strategy is meant to cripple Iran’s oil-dependent economy and force Tehran to quash not only its nuclear ambitions, but this time, its ballistic missile program and its influence in Syria.
With just days to go before renewed sanctions take effect on Monday, the reality is setting in: Three of Iran’s top five customers — India, China and Turkey — are resisting Washington’s call to end purchases outright, saying that there are not sufficient supplies worldwide to replace them, according to sources familiar with the matter.
Illustration: Mountain People
That pressure, along with worries of a damaging oil price spike, is putting the Trump administration’s hard line to the test and raising the possibility of bilateral deals to allow some buying to continue, according to the sources.
The tension has split the US administration into two camps, one led by US National Security Adviser John Bolton, who wants the toughest possible approach, and another by department officials keen to balance sanctions against preventing an oil price spike that could damage the US and its allies, according to a source briefed by administration officials on the matter.
The global price of oil last month peaked just below US$87 a barrel, a four-year high.
Because of that concern, the source said, the US administration is considering limited waivers for some Iranian customers until Russia and Saudi Arabia add additional supply next year, while limiting what Tehran can do with the proceeds in the meantime.
Revenues from sales could be escrowed for use by Tehran exclusively for humanitarian purposes, the source, who asked not to be named, said — a mechanism more stringent than a similar one imposed on Iran oil purchases during the last round of sanctions under former US president Barack Obama.
“If you’re the administration, you’d like to ensure you don’t have a spike in the price. So, you are better off from mid-2019 onwards to aggressively enforce the barrels side of reducing to zero and in the interim aggressively enforcing the revenue side,” the source said.
Such concessions could be problematic for the White House as it seeks stricter terms than under Obama, who along with European allies imposed sanctions that led to an agreement limiting Iran’s nuclear weapons development.
The department declined comment for this story, but the US administration has confirmed that Washington is considering waivers.
US Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin told reporters that countries will first have to reduce purchases of Iran’s oil by more than the 20 percent level they did under the previous sanctions.
US Department of the Treasury and state department teams have traveled to more than two dozen countries since Trump pulled out of the nuclear deal on May 8, warning companies and countries of the dangers of doing business with Iran.
US allies Japan and South Korea have already ceased importing Iran’s crude.
However, the situation is less clear among other, bigger buyers.
Brian Hook, the state department’s special representative for Iran, and Frank Fannon, the department’s top energy diplomat, met with officials in India, Iran’s No. 2 buyer, in the middle of last month after a US source said for the first time that the US administration was actively considering waivers.
An Indian government source said India told the US delegation that rising energy costs caused by a weak rupee and high oil prices meant zeroing out Iranian purchases was impossible until at least March next year.
“We have told this to the United States, as well as during Brian Hook’s visit,” the source said. “We cannot end oil imports from Iran at a time when alternatives are costly.”
A US diplomat confirmed the discussions, saying limited waivers for India and other countries were possible.
India typically imports more than 500,000 barrels per day (bpd) of Iranian oil, but has reduced that level in the past few months, according to official data.
Discussions are also under way with Turkey, Iran’s fourth-biggest crude buyer, even though Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Turkish ministers have openly criticized the sanctions.
An industry source in Turkey familiar with the talks told reporters that the country had cut Iranian imports in half already, and could get to zero, but would prefer to continue some purchases.
Obama’s administration granted a six-month waiver to Turkey, but the source said Turkey expected the Trump administration to impose tougher requirements for obtaining waivers that could potentially cover shorter periods.
“It could be for three months, or they may not get a waiver at all. It is all a bit unpredictable this time, as we understand a lot of things are up to Trump,” the source said.
The situation is least clear in China, Iran’s biggest customer, whose state-owned buyers are also seeking waivers. The country took in between 500,000 bpd and 800,000 bpd from Iran in the past several months, a typical range.
Beijing’s signals to its refiners have been mixed, the two sources said.
Last week, Reuters reported that Sinopec Group and China National Petroleum Corp, the country’s top state-owned refiners, have not placed orders for Iranian oil for this month because of concerns about the sanctions.
Joe McMonigle, energy analyst at Hedgeye in Washington, said he expected the US administration would have to accept some level of Iranian oil buying from China, given its consumption.
“Of all the countries, I don’t think they think China is going to zero,” he said.
Additional reporting by Nidhi Verma, David Gaffen and Aizhu Chen
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
The arrest in France of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has brought into sharp focus one of the major conflicts of our age. On one hand, we want privacy in our digital lives, which is why we like the kind of end-to-end encryption Telegram promises. On the other, we want the government to be able to stamp out repugnant online activities — such as child pornography or terrorist plotting. The reality is that we cannot have our cake and eat it, too. Durov last month was charged with complicity in crimes taking place on the app, including distributing child pornography,
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS