A new group of “concerned citizens” is planning a campaign of mass civil disobedience starting next month and promises it has hundreds of people — from teenagers to pensioners — ready to get arrested in an effort to draw attention to the unfolding climate emergency.
The group, called Extinction Rebellion, is today backed by almost 100 senior academics from across the UK, including the former archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams.
In a letter published in the Guardian they say the failure of politicians to tackle climate breakdown and the growing extinction crisis means “the ‘social contract’ has been broken [and] it is therefore not only our right, but our moral duty to bypass the government’s inaction and flagrant dereliction of duty, and to rebel to defend life itself.”
Illustration: Mountain People
Those behind Extinction Rebellion say almost 500 people have signed up to be arrested and that they plan to bring large sections of London to a standstill next month in a campaign of peaceful mass civil disobedience — culminating with a sit-in protest in Parliament Square on Nov. 17.
Roger Hallam, one of the founders of the campaign, said it was calling on the government to reduce carbon emissions to zero by 2025 and establish a “citizens assembly” to devise an emergency plan of action similar to that seen during World War II.
On top of the specific demands, Hallam said he hoped the campaign of “respectful disruption” would change the debate around climate breakdown and signal to those in power that the present course of action would lead to disaster.
“The planet is in ecological crisis — we are in the midst of the sixth mass extinction event this planet has experienced,” he said. “Children alive today in the UK will face the terrible consequences of inaction, from floods to wildfires, extreme weather to crop failures, and the inevitable breakdown of society. We have a duty to act.”
Extinction Rebellion is part of the Rising Up activist group and organizers have spent the past few months holding public meetings in towns and cities across the UK.
Hundreds of people have gathered in libraries and meeting halls, cafes and universities, pubs and churches to hear dire warnings about the consequences of the unfolding climate emergency — and what they can do about it.
“It feels like we are tapping into something very powerful in terms of the frustration and urgency many people are feeling as the evidence mounts of the scale of the climate emergency we are facing,” said Hallam, an academic at King’s College, London, who specializes in social change and protest.
He said the group was now getting 20 requests a week from people across the UK wanting to be given the talk.
“To put it simply, we’re fucked,” he said. “From the melting ice in the Arctic to the release of methane from the permafrost, the evidence is overwhelming and people are starting to realize that. What we need now is to start working out what we are going to do about it.”
The attempt to organize wide-scale civil disobedience around the looming climate breakdown comes just weeks after three people were jailed — and then released — for anti-fracking campaigns in the UK.
It also follows dire warnings from the UN that there are only 12 years left to prevent global ecological disaster.
Almost 100 academics — half of them professors — on Friday last week backed the call for rebellion.
“While our academic perspectives and expertise may differ, we are united on this one point: we will not tolerate the failure of this or any other government to ake robust and emergency action in respect of the worsening ecological crisis. The science is clear, the facts are incontrovertible, and it is unconscionable to us that our children and grandchildren should have to bear the terrifying brunt of an unprecedented disaster of our own making,” they wrote in a letter to the Guardian.
Last week, US Senator Bernie Sanders posted a link to an article supporting Extinction Rebellion, civil disobedience and the wider anti-fracking campaign to his 7.5 million followers.
Hallam said the group was in talks with campaigners in the US about organizing similar Extinction Rebellion events in Washington next month.
Green Party lawmaker Caroline Lucas is also supporting the plan and is to be among the speakers at the launch in parliament this week.
As part of their attempt to mobilize the wider environmental movement, activists from Extinction Rebellion, armed with flowers and letters, occupied Greenpeace headquarters last week.
Describing the move as a “tap on the shoulder of a friend,” they wanted the environmental organization to e-mail its members highlighting the rebellion plan — and ideally call on them to take part.
After two hours of “friendly discussions” the group left.
Greenpeace subsequently said that although it supports any attempt to raise awareness of the climate emergency, it does not know enough about those behind Extinction Rebellion to ask its members to take part.
However, Hallam remains undeterred. The planned rebellion is to begin with a declaration of demands being pinned to parliament this week and reach its peak with a peaceful sit-down protest in Parliament Square on Nov. 17.
“After that, who knows,” he said.
At the end of another meeting in a cafe on a west London estate this week, Hallam acknowledged it is impossible to say exactly what would happen.
How many of those who have signed up would actually turn up on the day? Would those who say they are prepared to get arrested and go to prison buckle when faced with police telling them to move? Would hundreds more supporters turn up unannounced?
Looking around the bustling cafe, where about half of the 30 people in attendance are signing up to take part, Hallam said: “In the end we have to realize that we will all be alone on our deathbed and asking ourselves whether we lived a worthwhile life — and for this generation the climate crisis is the overriding existential challenge. There are no guarantees, but doing nothing, not trying, is not an option.”
’If we fail you, it wasn’t for lack of effort’
Gail Bradbrook, scientist and veteran of tax justice campaigns and the Occupy movement:
“For years I have engaged with this ecological crisis on an intellectual level, the mounting evidence, the science, but now I have engaged with the potential destruction of this world on an emotional level and there is a fundamental difference. There is huge feeling of grief, of loss. I found myself bursting into tears, of feeling distant with longstanding friends, but as with other forms of grief, as the poets say, you start to come through that initial shock and feeling of loss, and there is a renewed appreciation of the beauty of the world, a renewed realization that we are connected.
“Once you face and feel the shock of what we are facing, if you are willing to face the grief and can process those feelings, there is tremendous energy and a will to do what it takes. So that is what we have been asking people, to be willing to look at the truth of our predicament and grieve.
“And something is starting to change. There is a still a disconnect between how bad things are and the action that needs to happen, but that gap is narrowing. There are more significant people starting to break ranks, both breaking from their institutions and breaking from their individual lives.
“For me it goes beyond the idea of protecting my life as a privileged individual, or even the idea of protecting my children’s future, to a deeper need to have been a good ancestor to future generations, to know that I did my best when the big challenge came.”
Alison Green, pro vice chancellor of Arden University and UK director of the Scientists Warning public engagement campaign:
“I have no formal background in environmental issues and am fairly senior in my organization, but unlike some academics I have taken the time to look properly at the evidence and have come to the clear conclusion that we are facing an imminent and potentially catastrophic climate emergency. It has led me to re-evaluate what I am doing and why I am doing it. I am a career academic, but in the face of what is likely about to happen to us I have to reconsider my priorities.
“I have children and I feel incredibly conflicted continuing in a ‘business as usual’ national setting, getting up and going to work when just around the corner there is a future for my children that is not the kind of future they believe they are working towards. If I am honest, it really breaks my heart. I have to ask myself, can I continue to do with integrity what I am doing when I know what is about to happen?
“I am therefore asking myself, am I prepared to protest? Am I prepared to go to jail? And these are questions I am hoping many more people start to engage with. There will not be an opportunity for a ‘lessons learned’ scenario if we don’t act or if we get this wrong — there will not be an opportunity to repent at leisure.
“If you understand the science, and I would put myself in that category, then I think there is an obligation to act — we are entitled to rebel because our interests are not being met. My levels of optimism are not high and this may not work, but we must have the courage to try.”
Jessica Townsend, writer:
“I’m writing a novel set in 2030 and as I started the research on climate change, I became more and more alarmed at the disconnect between what I was reading in popular science books and what is in the mainstream media. Much of it made me feel traumatized and upset. I don’t understand how we have allowed living animals to be part of a factory process or to treat the Earth as if it was just raw materials for our industries.
“Technology has made the world so complicated that regular people don’t have time to keep abreast of everything that’s happening, but the ecological disaster quietly unfolding around us is just too important to ignore: we have to wake up.
“The last campaign I was involved in was Stop the War and I was so gutted when [former British prime minister] Tony Blair invaded Iraq that I swore I’d never do this again, but I’m a grandmother. If we do nothing we are heading for 3 to 4°C of global warming. That will mean a superheated world, with perhaps a billion migrants and societal breakdown. My grandson, everyone’s grandchildren, deserve a better future than that.”
Rupert Read, academic at the University of East Anglia and Green Party politician:
“I’ve taken part in civil disobedience before, but not for the last 15 years. I’ve been prompted to again by the dire stakes of the climate breakdown we are now in the early throes of and by the dire failure of our government (or any government, for that matter) to take these stakes seriously.
“The way that climate chaos has manifested in the last three years, with our weather systems perhaps beginning to spiral out of control, and especially the overheating of the Arctic, has been a big factor for me. The situation in the Arctic is now genuinely terrifying, because of the risk of huge-scale methane release.
“This is an emergency, an unprecedented emergency. It dwarfs any other emergency we’ve known, including even World War II, and we will be judged by our children by how we respond in this emergency. Not by what are, in comparison, just distractions: such as Brexit. To future generations I would say that we are trying. Those of us who are joining this rebellion, and the many who support us, are really trying. If we fail you, it wasn’t for lack of effort.”
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS