At 10am on a muggy October morning, Crawford Market, one of Mumbai’s oldest, was stirring into life.
In a first-floor office inside the complex, the feared “blue squad” had assembled, forming a semi-circle around their boss, Anand Shinde, who was pumping them up.
At 10:30am, the phalanx, dressed in blue uniforms, hurried down the wooden staircase and hit the streets around the market.
Illustration: Yusha
Their target: shopkeepers and street vendors using plastic bags.
The blue squad — middle-aged and graying — might not look intimidating, but their weapon, a hefty 5,000 rupee (US$68) fine, has reduced grown men to begging, they said.
They move swiftly, striding into shops, rifling under the counter and, if they find plastic bags, impose a fine on the shopkeeper.
“No questions. No excuses. We don’t accept any bullshit. The fine is immediate and paid in cash on the spot,” squad member Annie George said sternly. “However, our goal is not to punish, but to make people aware. We met street hawkers and told them, don’t do it for us, do it for your children.”
From Starbucks and McDonald’s to tiny street food stall owners, no one is exempt from the ban on single-use plastic, introduced on June 30 by the authorities in the state of Maharashtra and in its capital, Mumbai.
The ban was prompted by vast quantities of plastic rubbish clogging up the already blocked drains during this year’s monsoon.
Most other Indian cities are scarred by mountains of plastic, but Mumbai, with its 20 million people concentrated on a tiny island, experiences near-catastrophic disruption during the monsoon, when sewers and drains fail to cope with the rain.
The ban prohibits the use of plastic bags, disposable cups and plates, and bottles under a certain size.
A walk through Crawford Market shows that some shopkeepers have either switched voluntarily to paper bags or learned the hard way.
“It hurt me to pay that massive fine. I was upset for days,” dried fruits seller Zahir Hussain said.
In Colaba, a popular street market, Varun Seth has discarded the plastic pouches he used to wrap jewelry in favor of tiny paper bags. On the roadside next to him, a vendor wraps fruit in newspaper — not so easy.
“It’s difficult for customers to carry fruit home this way, but if that’s the law then I guess it’s for our own good and that of our children,” he said.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has pledged to make India free of single-use plastic by 2022.
Most of the country’s 29 states have a full or partial ban, but public awareness is low and the law is rarely enforced. That is why the diligence of the blue squad has attracted attention.
Vasant Patel, the owner of Beauty Basics cosmetic store opposite Crawford Market, pleaded ignorance.
“I was told these bags are okay,” he said, pointing to a kind of bag that looks like cloth, but is in fact plastic.
“And surely I should be given some notice?” he asked George and her colleague, Smita Chandane.
“That’s what they all say. They all say they didn’t know what was allowed. Well, after he’s paid the fine, he will know all right,” Chandane said.
It was the same story at the beauty parlor next door. Tahir Motwala looked sheepish when George and Chandane found piles of plastic bags, even though he had displayed two paper carrier bags on a shelf behind the till.
George said this is a popular tactic: Prominently display paper bags, while keeping plastic bags under the counter.
After a tense few minutes, Mowala realized he cannot win; he paid the fine.
Shinde is aware that a ban alone is not enough. Shopkeepers need cheap alternatives.
“We are encouraging women’s self-help groups by giving them sewing machines to make cheap cloth bags. They have been given designated spots across the city where they congregate and where shopkeepers come to buy, and place orders for cloth bags,” he said.
His department also supports groups that are making disposable plates and cutlery from leaves, wood, jute, and concoctions such as a mixture of molasses and corn starch.
“We need an eco-system to make the ban sustainable,” Shinde said.
The city authorities have been realistic about the need to protect street food sellers.
They need small thin plastic bags to sell liquid items, such as lentils and curd, to poor laborers, or to protect their produce, such as bread, against the dust and rain.
“Anything above 50 microns, such as that kind of thin pouch, is allowed. We can’t ruin their livelihoods,” Shinde said.
However, the 250 members of the blue squad can get into sticky situations.
“Shopkeepers start shouting and arguing because 5,000 rupees is a big sum. We’ve been heckled and abused,” George said.
For her, the job satisfaction lies in seeing instant results. By 1pm, the squad had filled eight big bags with plastic carrier bags.
From the end of June to the beginning of this month, they seized almost 24 tonnes of plastic and collected 10 million rupees in fines.
“We are just a speck against a 20 million population, but we’re not doing too badly,” George said.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then