At 10am on a muggy October morning, Crawford Market, one of Mumbai’s oldest, was stirring into life.
In a first-floor office inside the complex, the feared “blue squad” had assembled, forming a semi-circle around their boss, Anand Shinde, who was pumping them up.
At 10:30am, the phalanx, dressed in blue uniforms, hurried down the wooden staircase and hit the streets around the market.
Illustration: Yusha
Their target: shopkeepers and street vendors using plastic bags.
The blue squad — middle-aged and graying — might not look intimidating, but their weapon, a hefty 5,000 rupee (US$68) fine, has reduced grown men to begging, they said.
They move swiftly, striding into shops, rifling under the counter and, if they find plastic bags, impose a fine on the shopkeeper.
“No questions. No excuses. We don’t accept any bullshit. The fine is immediate and paid in cash on the spot,” squad member Annie George said sternly. “However, our goal is not to punish, but to make people aware. We met street hawkers and told them, don’t do it for us, do it for your children.”
From Starbucks and McDonald’s to tiny street food stall owners, no one is exempt from the ban on single-use plastic, introduced on June 30 by the authorities in the state of Maharashtra and in its capital, Mumbai.
The ban was prompted by vast quantities of plastic rubbish clogging up the already blocked drains during this year’s monsoon.
Most other Indian cities are scarred by mountains of plastic, but Mumbai, with its 20 million people concentrated on a tiny island, experiences near-catastrophic disruption during the monsoon, when sewers and drains fail to cope with the rain.
The ban prohibits the use of plastic bags, disposable cups and plates, and bottles under a certain size.
A walk through Crawford Market shows that some shopkeepers have either switched voluntarily to paper bags or learned the hard way.
“It hurt me to pay that massive fine. I was upset for days,” dried fruits seller Zahir Hussain said.
In Colaba, a popular street market, Varun Seth has discarded the plastic pouches he used to wrap jewelry in favor of tiny paper bags. On the roadside next to him, a vendor wraps fruit in newspaper — not so easy.
“It’s difficult for customers to carry fruit home this way, but if that’s the law then I guess it’s for our own good and that of our children,” he said.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has pledged to make India free of single-use plastic by 2022.
Most of the country’s 29 states have a full or partial ban, but public awareness is low and the law is rarely enforced. That is why the diligence of the blue squad has attracted attention.
Vasant Patel, the owner of Beauty Basics cosmetic store opposite Crawford Market, pleaded ignorance.
“I was told these bags are okay,” he said, pointing to a kind of bag that looks like cloth, but is in fact plastic.
“And surely I should be given some notice?” he asked George and her colleague, Smita Chandane.
“That’s what they all say. They all say they didn’t know what was allowed. Well, after he’s paid the fine, he will know all right,” Chandane said.
It was the same story at the beauty parlor next door. Tahir Motwala looked sheepish when George and Chandane found piles of plastic bags, even though he had displayed two paper carrier bags on a shelf behind the till.
George said this is a popular tactic: Prominently display paper bags, while keeping plastic bags under the counter.
After a tense few minutes, Mowala realized he cannot win; he paid the fine.
Shinde is aware that a ban alone is not enough. Shopkeepers need cheap alternatives.
“We are encouraging women’s self-help groups by giving them sewing machines to make cheap cloth bags. They have been given designated spots across the city where they congregate and where shopkeepers come to buy, and place orders for cloth bags,” he said.
His department also supports groups that are making disposable plates and cutlery from leaves, wood, jute, and concoctions such as a mixture of molasses and corn starch.
“We need an eco-system to make the ban sustainable,” Shinde said.
The city authorities have been realistic about the need to protect street food sellers.
They need small thin plastic bags to sell liquid items, such as lentils and curd, to poor laborers, or to protect their produce, such as bread, against the dust and rain.
“Anything above 50 microns, such as that kind of thin pouch, is allowed. We can’t ruin their livelihoods,” Shinde said.
However, the 250 members of the blue squad can get into sticky situations.
“Shopkeepers start shouting and arguing because 5,000 rupees is a big sum. We’ve been heckled and abused,” George said.
For her, the job satisfaction lies in seeing instant results. By 1pm, the squad had filled eight big bags with plastic carrier bags.
From the end of June to the beginning of this month, they seized almost 24 tonnes of plastic and collected 10 million rupees in fines.
“We are just a speck against a 20 million population, but we’re not doing too badly,” George said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS