Religious law changes
If the proposed changes to the Religious Basic Act (宗教基本法) go ahead, it will effectively remove religious groups from government oversight.
This is an extremely dangerous crossroads in Taiwan’s democracy, as it will allow the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), as well as future governments, to substitute its religious tentacles to manipulate society, and also allow political corruption to flourish.
The DPP is presently enacting correct political reform in dismantling the myriad web of patronage the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) established, but this change to the law would see Taiwan reversing these progressive reforms.
Already present religious groups and charities are under a cloud of suspicion for lack of financial transparency, exploitation of volunteers and powerful political patronage.
Taiwan is facing a treacherous path with this religious law.
Let us hope enlightened citizens will express outrage at this threat to its newly won, flourishing democracy.
Michael Woods
Taichung
Funding epiphany
I would like to propose a simple solution to fund all of Taiwan’s debts. Be it bailing out the National Health Insurance, paying for new weaponry, stabilizing the New Taiwan dollar, paying for military pensions, or whatever.
The way to do this is to fine anyone on the MRT NT$1,000 if they are caught using their smartphone while getting on or off a train or while walking up or down the stairs.
As so many people do this daily, within a few months all Taiwan’s funding problems would be solved!
Obviously, this is sarcasm, but why, after all these years, does MRT management still allow this unsafe, rude and selfish behavior to continue?
Marc Plumb
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS