A house divided cannot stand. Sadly, such is the situation confronting Taiwan as Beijing shores up its “united front” tactics to undermine the authority of Taipei.
The latest case in point is the first Cross-Strait Private Sector Roundtable Forum that opened in Beijing yesterday.
Chang Hsien-yao (張顯耀), who heads a 60-strong Taiwanese delegation to the annual event, said he hopes the forum — spanning several fields including economics, technology, culture and agriculture — would serve as a platform for cross-strait communications, dialogue and cooperation, and provide opportunities for China-based Taiwanese businesspeople planning to tap into Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative.
Nothing is unattainable as long as both sides of the Strait cooperate, Chang told the forum, trumpeting the goal of “cross-strait economic collaboration, so that [we can] make money from the world together.”
Indeed, all sectors are encouraged to explore business opportunities, and flourishing cross-strait exchanges are certainly to everyone’s benefit, as they help promote harmony, defuse tension and enhance mutual understanding.
However, it is a different story when one side secretly tries to sow division in the other.
Beijing has suspended communications with Taipei since President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) inauguration in May 2016, blaming the Tsai administration’s refusal to recognize the so-called “1992 consensus” that embodies the “one China” principle.
While Beijing refuses to engage in dialogue with Taipei, it engages in various activities with individuals and organizations outside the government to marginalize the Tsai administration.
The forum, for example, is but another “united front” ploy by China using its economic resources to entice Taiwanese under the guise of goodwill when in fact its ultimate goal is to undermine the authority of Taiwan’s elected government.
China has not forgone its objective of bringing Taiwan into its fold — by use of military force if necessary — and does not refrain from mixing politics with arts, sports, culture or any other matter to stifle Taiwan’s international space.
Its latest deception at the forum is not surprising, as its malicious intentions toward Taiwan are nothing new.
However, what needs serious consideration is the question why some Taiwanese willingly play along with Beijing’s schemes against themselves?
The forum’s Taiwanese participants’ “collaboration” with Beijing does not constitute a healthy cross-strait exchange, as it ultimately serves to fulfill China’s hidden agenda of bypassing the Taiwanese government and dealing with non-governmental actors.
Chang and his ilk have said that the forum aims to serve the well-being of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople, but the truth is that they are nothing but tools in Beijing’s political maneuvering against Taiwan.
Regrettable would be an understatement to describe the extent to which some Taiwanese willingly play into China’s hand.
Unless Taiwanese stand united, they will always be vulnerable to China’s ever-changing “united front” tricks.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS