US companies are scrambling to line up factories and suppliers outside of China as the US-China trade war hikes the cost of importing everything from furniture to toilet paper, but for some products, it is not that easy.
Barbecue grills, luggage and mattresses are among a long list of consumer items that China has a near stranglehold on when it comes to supplying the US.
While US President Donald Trump’s tariffs are a potential boon for manufacturing rivals from Southeast Asia to Mexico, the reality is that shifting what can often be highly-specialized production and training new workers cost time and money.
“People are moving out of China because they are panicked,” American Apparel & Footwear Association president Rick Helfenbein said in an interview in Hong Kong on Tuesday, but added: “Certain things are really, really hard to move.”
That has retailers from Walmart Inc to Target Corp anxious about tariffs announced last month on US$200 billion of Chinese exports, which Trump has said would be increased from 10 percent to 25 percent next year.
The Retail Industry Leaders Association, which counts Apple Inc and Home Depot Inc as members, is seeking exemptions to the levies on a raft of products as companies warn that without a reprieve, they are almost certain to pass on costs to US shoppers.
That hike is already being felt in the market for luggage, with Samsonite International SA notifying wholesale buyers of a 10 percent price increase even before last month’s tariff announcement.
The company has said it would likely pass tariff costs to consumers.
China makes more than 70 percent of the travel and sports bags sold in the US, making it one of the sectors most dependent on the Asian nation for supply, according to data from the US International Trade Commission (ITC), a federal agency in Washington.
There is “no way” US importers and sellers of travel goods can avoid the new tariff, said Michele Marini Pittenger, president of the Travel Goods Association, which estimates the industry’s total reliance on China at 84 percent.
“Product is not easily moved, as other countries don’t have the capacity, or the capability, to produce what is made in China today,” she said.
There are some products where China is even more dominant. The US imported US$353 million of bikes with 25-inch-or-less wheels last year, with 92 percent of those coming from China, the ITC said.
About 90 percent of the world’s LED lighting comes from China, according to Morgan Stanley, and 85 percent of US imports of frozen tilapia fillets come from Chinese fish farms.
Trump says US companies worried about the tariffs should move their production home, while a number — from power converter maker Vicor Corp to climate-control systems company Lennox International Inc — are looking at shifting their supply chains elsewhere.
However, finding other locations to establish production of items that have been so dominated by Chinese manufacturers is difficult, Helfenbein said.
Some companies cannot move because of the challenge in finding manufacturers outside China willing to put up with the narrow margins and stringent requirements involved in producing them, he said.
“You have to think of it from the factory perspective: You want to do what’s easiest, you don’t want to do what’s hardest,” Helfenbein said. “The only reason these businesses have hung around is people who have been in them for years are specialists.”
If Trump extends the tariff hit to cover a further US$267 billion in Chinese goods, children’s shoes, baby clothes and sweaters would be among items that would be hard to shift production or source elsewhere, the American Apparel & Footwear Association said.
Manufacturers of children’s products like cribs and swings have also weighed in, with Mattel Inc saying they made investments in China to ensure suppliers comply with safety standards required to get their products into the US market.
Large retailers including J.C. Penney Co and Dollar Tree Inc warned before last month’s tariff hit that companies lack feasible alternatives to China-based suppliers, saying that rerouting decades-old supply chains could take years.
Smaller businesses also lobbied the Trump administration, according to comments submitted to the Office of the US Trade Representative before last month’s tariffs were enacted:
While the 10 percent tariff might be manageable for many companies — even those operating on thin profit margins — the increase next year would see companies lose the flexibility to shield consumers from higher costs, American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai president Kenneth Jarrett said.
“Once you get the 25 percent tariff, that will be well beyond their profit margin,” Jarrett said. “They will have no choice but to pass those costs on.”
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS