Food is a powerful storyteller. Our diet signals whether we cook at home, shop locally, prefer inexpensive dishes, or even think about what we eat.
However, the consumer side of mealtime is just one of food’s many plotlines. Food has backstories, too, none more unsavory than this one: Agricultural workers — the people who make dinner possible — are also the most likely to go to bed hungry.
Every day, about 1.1 billion people — one-third of the global workforce — go to work at the world’s farms. Every night, many of them return home — having suffered countless violations of their human rights — without enough money to feed themselves or their families.
Farm work is one of the only professions in which national legal protections are regularly ignored. Minimum wage standards endorsed by the International Labour Organization (ILO) and adopted by many industries around the world remain either unenforced in the agricultural sector or do not extend to informal farm workers.
However, because migrant labor makes up the bulk of the agricultural workforce, this gap in coverage has become a canyon.
In rural parts of developing countries, 80 percent of farm workers earn less than US$1.25 per day, trapping them in poverty.
Additionally, piece-rate pay schemes force workers to spend hours in extreme weather to meet demanding quotas.
Worst of all, those working on unethical farms do so at high risk.
According to the ILO, dangerous machinery, long working hours and exposure to toxic pesticides make farm work one of the world’s deadliest jobs; more than 170,000 agricultural workers are killed every year on unsafe farms, twice the mortality rate of any other industry.
Yet, agricultural work is typically excluded from occupational health and safety rules in most countries. Even in the US, there is no federal law mandating that employers give farm workers breaks for water and shade, even though heatstroke remains a leading cause of work-related farm deaths in the US.
The recent death of Fabian Tomasi, an Argentine farm worker and critic of the agrochemical industry in his country, was a reminder of the hazards of industrialized agriculture.
While companies like Monsanto argue that pesticides are necessary to ensure food security, the consequences of chemical exposure to workers like Tomasi — whose body was left twisted and mangled after years of handling chemicals without protection — reveal the human cost of their use.
Even in developed countries, acute pesticide poisoning affects one in every 5,000 agricultural workers and countless more employees are exposed to toxins on a daily basis.
Unfortunately, few agricultural workers are in a position to advocate for their rights. Seasonal and rural workers lack access to collective bargaining and undocumented migrant workers avoid unions for fear that employers would retaliate by calling the immigration authorities.
Moreover, basic benefits, such as social security, healthcare and workers’ compensation, are typically nonexistent. Exempt from much workplace regulation, this is an industry that can afford to put cost-saving and profit above the wellbeing of employees.
It is time for us to stop passively sticking a fork into what lands on our plates and use our purchasing power to resist paying the cheapest price for food.
Holding people accountable for mistreating farm workers will be challenging, but not impossible. Everyone can begin by calling on governments to spend more time protecting farm workers than investigating their immigration status.
For this to be possible, people need more information about where their food comes from. Nowadays, everyone tends to rely on informational labels, but the story they tell is fragmented, incomplete and at times even misleading.
People need to take the extra steps to learn the full story. This means moving beyond voluntary labels declaring that food is produced fairly and humanely to demand mandatory labels that expose non-compliance with these norms.
Worldwide, about 821 million people are undernourished — a figure that continues to increase. This is a tragedy; no one anywhere should have their rights, including the right to food, violated; yet that is exactly what so many farm workers and food-chain workers endure every day.
Fighting for their rights has always been difficult, but if people continue the battle, the story of the global food system might lose some of its bitterness.
Hilal Elver is the UN special rapporteur on the right to food and a research professor of global studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Melissa Shapiro is a consultant to the UN special rapporteur on the right to food and a former attorney-adviser with the US Environmental Protection Agency. You can learn more about the work of the UN special rapporteur and access her official report on agricultural workers and the right to food at Hilalelver.org.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS