Food is a powerful storyteller. Our diet signals whether we cook at home, shop locally, prefer inexpensive dishes, or even think about what we eat.
However, the consumer side of mealtime is just one of food’s many plotlines. Food has backstories, too, none more unsavory than this one: Agricultural workers — the people who make dinner possible — are also the most likely to go to bed hungry.
Every day, about 1.1 billion people — one-third of the global workforce — go to work at the world’s farms. Every night, many of them return home — having suffered countless violations of their human rights — without enough money to feed themselves or their families.
Farm work is one of the only professions in which national legal protections are regularly ignored. Minimum wage standards endorsed by the International Labour Organization (ILO) and adopted by many industries around the world remain either unenforced in the agricultural sector or do not extend to informal farm workers.
However, because migrant labor makes up the bulk of the agricultural workforce, this gap in coverage has become a canyon.
In rural parts of developing countries, 80 percent of farm workers earn less than US$1.25 per day, trapping them in poverty.
Additionally, piece-rate pay schemes force workers to spend hours in extreme weather to meet demanding quotas.
Worst of all, those working on unethical farms do so at high risk.
According to the ILO, dangerous machinery, long working hours and exposure to toxic pesticides make farm work one of the world’s deadliest jobs; more than 170,000 agricultural workers are killed every year on unsafe farms, twice the mortality rate of any other industry.
Yet, agricultural work is typically excluded from occupational health and safety rules in most countries. Even in the US, there is no federal law mandating that employers give farm workers breaks for water and shade, even though heatstroke remains a leading cause of work-related farm deaths in the US.
The recent death of Fabian Tomasi, an Argentine farm worker and critic of the agrochemical industry in his country, was a reminder of the hazards of industrialized agriculture.
While companies like Monsanto argue that pesticides are necessary to ensure food security, the consequences of chemical exposure to workers like Tomasi — whose body was left twisted and mangled after years of handling chemicals without protection — reveal the human cost of their use.
Even in developed countries, acute pesticide poisoning affects one in every 5,000 agricultural workers and countless more employees are exposed to toxins on a daily basis.
Unfortunately, few agricultural workers are in a position to advocate for their rights. Seasonal and rural workers lack access to collective bargaining and undocumented migrant workers avoid unions for fear that employers would retaliate by calling the immigration authorities.
Moreover, basic benefits, such as social security, healthcare and workers’ compensation, are typically nonexistent. Exempt from much workplace regulation, this is an industry that can afford to put cost-saving and profit above the wellbeing of employees.
It is time for us to stop passively sticking a fork into what lands on our plates and use our purchasing power to resist paying the cheapest price for food.
Holding people accountable for mistreating farm workers will be challenging, but not impossible. Everyone can begin by calling on governments to spend more time protecting farm workers than investigating their immigration status.
For this to be possible, people need more information about where their food comes from. Nowadays, everyone tends to rely on informational labels, but the story they tell is fragmented, incomplete and at times even misleading.
People need to take the extra steps to learn the full story. This means moving beyond voluntary labels declaring that food is produced fairly and humanely to demand mandatory labels that expose non-compliance with these norms.
Worldwide, about 821 million people are undernourished — a figure that continues to increase. This is a tragedy; no one anywhere should have their rights, including the right to food, violated; yet that is exactly what so many farm workers and food-chain workers endure every day.
Fighting for their rights has always been difficult, but if people continue the battle, the story of the global food system might lose some of its bitterness.
Hilal Elver is the UN special rapporteur on the right to food and a research professor of global studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Melissa Shapiro is a consultant to the UN special rapporteur on the right to food and a former attorney-adviser with the US Environmental Protection Agency. You can learn more about the work of the UN special rapporteur and access her official report on agricultural workers and the right to food at Hilalelver.org.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS