On Nov. 24, Taiwan’s 19.2 million eligible voters are to go to the polls to elect 11,047 public officials. While the public and the media are devoting most of their attention to and strictly scrutinizing the 93 candidates vying for the 22 city mayor and county commissioner seats, hardly anyone cares about what is going on in the grassroots-level elections — and they should.
As Taiwan’s democracy matures, there have been far less cases of high-ranking public officials being embroiled in corruption charges or other illegal practices, or candidates running for high-level posts seeking to boost their chance of victory with vote-buying. To outsiders or those who do not look closely enough, Taiwan does seem like a shining beacon of democracy in Asia.
However, at the grassroots level, changes have been less drastic in terms of electoral political culture, while the entanglement of politics and crime remains strong. Vote-buying and corruption seem to be more common, as are other criminal activities.
Two lists of city and county councilor candidates who are either on trial or have been found guilty of corruption or other illegal activities published by the New Power Party (NPP) shed some light on the scope of the problem.
Sixty-seven, or 13 percent, of the councilor candidates nominated by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT); 37, or 9.3 percent, of the councilor candidates representing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP); and 66 independent or minor-party councilor candidates have criminal records or are facing criminal charges, the NPP said.
That means that about one in 10 councilor candidates has engaged in illegal activities, given that 1,769 councilor candidates joined the local elections this year. The number is down to 1,754 after 15 of the candidates were last week disqualified by the Central Election Commission for having run afoul of the law or electoral procedures.
The charges brought against them range from corruption, vote-buying and driving under the influence, to intimidation, running a gambling house and counterfeiting US dollar bills. Some of them are convicted of crimes that one would hardly ever associate with holders of public office, such as manslaughter, attempted murder and causing bodily harm to others.
It is inconceivable that these people are actually running for a post, the holder of which is expected to safeguard the interests of local residents, and supervise the mayor and other city affairs. With their compromised moral standards, one can hardly imagine them properly fulfilling the duties the position entails.
Of more concern is that neither the KMT nor the DPP have responded to the NPP’s call for an explanation as to why they endorsed candidates with a rap sheet. The lack of response either suggests a guilty conscience or that the two major parties simply care too little about who they choose to fill grassroots-level seats.
Eradicating vote-buying and corruption practices is a similar task to promoting gender equality in politics. Electing a female president and setting a minimum quota for female lawmakers in the Legislative Yuan might seem like a huge achievement, but they are mostly symbolic if the posts of borough and village wardens continue to be dominated by men.
By the same token, if people continue to be approached in their neighborhoods by candidates running for local positions offering them money in exchange for their support, or see their city councilors or village wardens closely associated with local gangs — or being members themselves — they will not have faith in the nation’s political system.
Anti-corruption reforms can only be called a success when they have trickled down to local levels. Unfortunately, this will not happen until the nation’s two major parties start being responsible political actors. A good first step would be to stop filling local councils with politicians who have criminal records.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday was handcuffed and escorted by police to the Taipei Detention Center, after the Taipei District Court ordered that he be detained and held incommunicado for suspected corruption during his tenure as Taipei mayor. The ruling reversed an earlier decision by the same court on Monday last week that ordered Ko’s release without bail. That decision was appealed by prosecutors on Wednesday, leading the High Court to conclude that Ko had been “actively involved” in the alleged corruption and it ordered the district court to hold a second detention hearing. Video clips
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
RSS