On Nov. 24, Taiwan’s 19.2 million eligible voters are to go to the polls to elect 11,047 public officials. While the public and the media are devoting most of their attention to and strictly scrutinizing the 93 candidates vying for the 22 city mayor and county commissioner seats, hardly anyone cares about what is going on in the grassroots-level elections — and they should.
As Taiwan’s democracy matures, there have been far less cases of high-ranking public officials being embroiled in corruption charges or other illegal practices, or candidates running for high-level posts seeking to boost their chance of victory with vote-buying. To outsiders or those who do not look closely enough, Taiwan does seem like a shining beacon of democracy in Asia.
However, at the grassroots level, changes have been less drastic in terms of electoral political culture, while the entanglement of politics and crime remains strong. Vote-buying and corruption seem to be more common, as are other criminal activities.
Two lists of city and county councilor candidates who are either on trial or have been found guilty of corruption or other illegal activities published by the New Power Party (NPP) shed some light on the scope of the problem.
Sixty-seven, or 13 percent, of the councilor candidates nominated by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT); 37, or 9.3 percent, of the councilor candidates representing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP); and 66 independent or minor-party councilor candidates have criminal records or are facing criminal charges, the NPP said.
That means that about one in 10 councilor candidates has engaged in illegal activities, given that 1,769 councilor candidates joined the local elections this year. The number is down to 1,754 after 15 of the candidates were last week disqualified by the Central Election Commission for having run afoul of the law or electoral procedures.
The charges brought against them range from corruption, vote-buying and driving under the influence, to intimidation, running a gambling house and counterfeiting US dollar bills. Some of them are convicted of crimes that one would hardly ever associate with holders of public office, such as manslaughter, attempted murder and causing bodily harm to others.
It is inconceivable that these people are actually running for a post, the holder of which is expected to safeguard the interests of local residents, and supervise the mayor and other city affairs. With their compromised moral standards, one can hardly imagine them properly fulfilling the duties the position entails.
Of more concern is that neither the KMT nor the DPP have responded to the NPP’s call for an explanation as to why they endorsed candidates with a rap sheet. The lack of response either suggests a guilty conscience or that the two major parties simply care too little about who they choose to fill grassroots-level seats.
Eradicating vote-buying and corruption practices is a similar task to promoting gender equality in politics. Electing a female president and setting a minimum quota for female lawmakers in the Legislative Yuan might seem like a huge achievement, but they are mostly symbolic if the posts of borough and village wardens continue to be dominated by men.
By the same token, if people continue to be approached in their neighborhoods by candidates running for local positions offering them money in exchange for their support, or see their city councilors or village wardens closely associated with local gangs — or being members themselves — they will not have faith in the nation’s political system.
Anti-corruption reforms can only be called a success when they have trickled down to local levels. Unfortunately, this will not happen until the nation’s two major parties start being responsible political actors. A good first step would be to stop filling local councils with politicians who have criminal records.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS