In a meeting with ASEAN foreign ministers in Singapore last week, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo pressed his counterparts to uphold a free and open Indo-Pacific region to ensure peace and stability.
His gesture resonated with the direction of President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) New Southbound Policy, as well as a policy speech by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in Kenya in August 2016, as Pompeo called on democratic nations to safeguard a trans-Asian world order that arose from the convergence of the Indian and Pacific oceans.
This development signifies Washington’s determination to incorporate the Indian Ocean into the longstanding framework of Asia-Pacific security, and to globalize universal values, norms and institutions that underpin international governance.
The US perceives China and Russia as formidable competitors, threatening to weaken the US-led security system and globalization. China and Russia have forged strong political, economic and diplomatic partnerships to reaffirm their interests.
Since 2013, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) have held more than 20 summits, but have revealed few details of any bilateral agreements.
While the US has been concentrating its counterterrorism efforts in central Asia and the Middle East, China and Russia have been reaching out to developing nations with appealing rhetoric about diplomatic non-intervention and authoritarian governance.
First, China has identified with Africa and Latin America, because Chinese modernization was launched from a position far inferior to that of Japan and the West. Beijing endorses the importance of labor-intensive industrial development and dismisses governance reform as a prerequisite for economic growth.
Second, the search for raw materials and new markets has driven China to deepen its ties with Africa and Latin America. Beijing has contributed to technology transfers and infrastructure projects, and has constructed and managed business zones, agro-technical parks and telecom centers in these continents.
Third, China is determined to become a global leader. It has offered unmatchable financial assistance under the Belt and Road Initiative. While investing abroad, Chinese state-owned enterprises can make long-term decisions without worrying about immediate losses and gains.
Chinese universities and research institutes offer generous scholarships to students and officials, nurturing the next generation of elites and projecting China as a land of opportunity.
China’s growing clout has presented an irresistible attraction to US allies. Given the severe challenges of a globalizing China and the US’ attempts to hold onto its status as the sole superpower, there are bound to be intense power rivalries.
Cognizant of China’s outreach, Pompeo’s Indo-Pacific strategy provides a template to reimagine US alliances in these two huge maritime zones.
Striving to promote free trade, democratic governance and innovative development, this strategy not only solidifies links among Indian and Pacific nations, but also questions China’s top-down autocratic system, which favors collective interests.
Along the same lines as the New Southbound Policy, the US’ Indo-Pacific framework expands the scope of cooperation by integrating many liberalized economies of East Asia into South and Southeast Asia.
This offers Taiwan a convenient platform from which to project itself as a regional player, reprioritizing its maritime economic strategies and collaborating with neighboring states over geopolitical and diplomatic matters.
Joseph Tse-Hei Lee is a professor of history at Pace University in New York City.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS