Nigeria, one of Africa’s two wealthiest economies, has overtaken India as home to the world’s greatest concentration of extreme poverty amid warnings that the continent is to host nine out of 10 of the world’s poorest people within 12 years.
The claim comes as concerns mount that the growth in poverty — and in Africa in particular — is outpacing efforts to eradicate it.
It was made in a paper for the Brookings Institution think tank by three experts associated with the World Poverty Clock, which was launched last year to track trends in poverty reduction.
Illustration: Mountain People
Energy-rich Nigeria in May overtook India to become the nation with the world’s highest number of people — 87 million — living in extreme poverty, compared with India’s 73 million people, the authors said.
The report says 14 of the 18 nations in the world where the number of people in extreme poverty is rising are in Africa. The Democratic Republic of the Congo, ranked third, is also expected to overtake India soon.
Previously, the ambition of eradicating extreme poverty — the first of the UN’s 17 sustainable development goals, adopted by world leaders at a historic summit in September 2015 — had been lauded as a success story.
Trajectories for poverty in African nations have already been raising concerns among policymakers over issues as diverse as stability, security and migration trends, already a serious concern in Europe.
Inevitably, the claims have prompted sharp differences of opinion in Nigeria, where assessing poverty figures is a political issue.
In a hard-hitting editorial last week, the Punch daily newspaper noted the rise in poverty since 2010.
“For a country that is so richly blessed, Nigeria’s poverty narrative is an embarrassment to both the citizens and outsiders,” it said.
However, the Brookings report has not come as a surprise to keen observers of events in Nigeria after the World Bank had earlier warned of growing poverty in the nation.
“Back in February, the African Development Bank had said that 152 million Nigerians, representing almost 80 percent of the country’s estimated 193.3 million population, lived on less than US$2 per day,” it said.
However, Nigerian Minister of Trade, Industry and Investment Okechukwu Enelamah said that the figures reflected a period when Nigeria was in recession.
“I think first we need to understand there are reports that are lagging in indicators, which means people are reporting on history,” he said, adding that he hoped Nigeria’s economic policies would lead to a reduction in poverty.
The figures mark a profound change in the pervading narrative of global poverty — and where it is concentrated — throwing up challenges for the international community, the report’s authors said.
They show the number of extreme poor in India is declining at a rate of about 44 people a minute, compared with Nigeria, where it has been rising by six people a minute.
Homi Kharas, one of the Brookings authors who helped set up the World Poverty Clock, said that the clock was intended as a device to dramatize the rate of poverty reduction required to end extreme poverty by 2030.
“It gives you the speed, not the level of poverty reduction, and the world has been going happily along celebrating the fact that a lot of people are coming out of poverty,” he said. “But the fact is the speed is not only less than required, but it is not doing well, particularly in Africa.”
While population growth in India is dropping even as it enjoys economic development, in African nations, the opposite is true, Kharas said.
“Africa has the fastest-growing population of any major region, while population growth in India is probably under 1 percent,” he said. “In Africa, however, a slow combination of population growth, conflict, economic and social problems, and bad government and bad governance has led to the current situation.”
“Nigeria is a rich country, but because much of its wealth comes from the production and sale of oil, it doesn’t directly go to the pockets of ordinary people,” Kharas added.
For those struggling with poverty in Nigeria, the issues are more visceral.
Mohammed Ahmed, 33, is a Muslim teacher and father of four from Abuja. He said that once he has paid for his children’s school expenses, there is barely enough to feed the family.
“My salary is 20,000 naira [US$55.40] per month. Even though school is free, we still need to pay examination fees and other costs,” he said. “I go to the market to buy food every day. I spent about 400 to 500 naira to feed eight people every day, because I have other relatives living with me. It is very tough, but I try to feed my family twice a day.”
The shift in the center of global poverty from Asia to Africa is no surprise to Andrew Shepherd, director of the Chronic Poverty Advisory Network at the Overseas Development Institute, which noted the trend several years ago.
“Broadly speaking, I would agree that there is a shift from Asia to Africa, although it is probably slower than some people think,” Shepherd said.
The situation appears to be exacerbated in African nations by features less visible in many Asian countries, including questions of poor governance, harsher effects of climate change and conflict, he added.
“I think it is shifting to states that are conflict-affected and states most affected by climate change — and there is quite a correlation between the two — and states that have both poor policies and are significantly underfunded and in terms of aid,” he said. “There is a whole bunch of these states and a significant number are in Africa.”
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS