From truck drivers using GPS to nurses recording patients’ vital signs to train conductors checking tickets with hand-held devices, everybody nowadays needs some basic digital skills. Demand for digitally savvy workers has been rising quietly over the past decade or more, but that shift is gathering pace and it is transforming the entire labor market, not just the tech sector.
In a recent report, the McKinsey Global Institute compares the number of hours workers currently spend using 25 core skills in five categories — physical and manual, basic cognitive, higher cognitive, social and emotional, and technological — to the number of hours they will spend on those skills in 2030. Unsurprisingly, given the wider use of automation and artificial intelligence (AI), we expect a 55 percent jump in demand for all types of technological skills, from basic digital knowledge to advanced skills like programming.
Demand for social and emotional skills that machines lack — such as the ability to work in teams, to lead others, to negotiate, and to empathize — will also rise sharply. The number of jobs requiring such skills — in sectors like healthcare, education, sales and marketing, and management — will increase by 24 percent.
Illustration: Yusha
Demand for some higher cognitive skills, especially creativity and complex problem-solving, will also rise. However, machines are already making inroads into some areas that require higher cognitive skills, such as advanced literacy and writing, and quantitative and statistical capabilities. This highlights the potential for automation and AI to displace even white-collar office workers, for example, in accounting, finance and legal services.
ENDANGERED JOBS
Still, it is jobs requiring basic cognitive skills, including data entry, that face the biggest challenge, as they are set to decline even faster than they have over the past 15 years. The same is true of physical and manual skills, such as gross motor skills. Though this might remain the largest skill category by hours worked in many countries, including the US, in others, such as France and the UK, they will be overtaken by demand for social and emotional skills; in Germany, physical and manual skills will be surpassed by higher cognitive skills in terms of hours worked.
Businesses, policymakers, educators, industry associations and labor unions need to take note of these looming skill shifts, which represent a major socioeconomic challenge. For example, because social and emotional skills are learned largely outside of school, education systems might need to find ways to incorporate them into curricula.
Moreover, hundreds of millions of workers around the world will need access to retraining initiatives, which today are relatively rare. We estimate that 75 million to 375 million people, or 3 to 14 percent of the global workforce, will need to switch occupational categories by 2030 or become unemployed. If not managed well, such transitions could exacerbate social tensions and lead to rising skill and wage polarization.
For companies, these skills shifts are part of the larger challenge posed by automation, which is disrupting business models and upending how work is organized within firms. In a survey of more than 3,000 business leaders that we conducted as part of our research, we found that companies expect to move toward cross-functional and team-based work, with an emphasis on agility. The challenge will be to secure workers with the right skills for companies’ particular technological needs and ambitions.
ADAPTATION
Moreover, this is not a one-time shift. As the machines working alongside humans continue to evolve, workers will need to adapt. Instead of studying for two decades and working for the next four, as we have done in the past, workers will need continuous learning to acquire new skills and upgrade existing ones throughout our working lives.
To realize that imperative requires not only concrete lifelong learning options, but also a change in workers’ mindsets and organizational cultures. To this end, some companies — for example, the German software provider SAP — are seeking to provide continuing education programs in-house. Others, such as AT&T, are working with educational institutions to raise workforce skills.
In Sweden, job-security councils funded by companies and unions coach individuals who become unemployed and provide retraining and temporary financial support. In the US, the Markle Foundation’s pilot program Skillful helps workers without college degrees upgrade and market their skills.
However, much more needs to be done to ensure that companies and workers thrive in this new era of automation and AI. Only with an appropriately trained and adaptable workforce will our economies be able to secure the full productivity-enhancing benefits of evolving technologies.
Susan Lund is a partner of McKinsey & Company and a leader at the McKinsey Global Institute. Eric Hazan is a managing partner at McKinsey & Company and a member of the McKinsey Global Institute Council.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS