On Thursday last week, President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration announced another Cabinet reshuffle. Minister of Justice Chiu Tai-san (邱太三) might serve as an adviser to the National Security Council, with Investigation Bureau Director-General Tsai Ching-hsiang (蔡清祥) taking over Chiu’s post. Also, Cabinet spokesman Hsu Kuo-yung (徐國勇) is to serve as minister of the interior.
These changes attracted the most attention, and attracted even more because former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was indicted by the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office just two days before the announcement.
In the past, the pan-green camp itself has repeatedly criticized the Ministry of Justice — especially its minister — but judicial reform is also the Judicial Yuan’s responsibility. At least Chiu abolished the illegal Special Investigation Division during his term.
Chiu also knew his subordinates well enough to assign them tasks according to their abilities. He put Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office Chief Prosecutor Shing Tai-chao (邢泰釗) — a good corruption fighter — in the right place. Ma would not entrust Shing with an important position. Hopefully the judiciary will not continue to shy away now that they have to deal with Emperor Ma again.
Soon after former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) stepped down, he was banned from leaving Taiwan and chased by the courts. Some in the pan-green camp believe that “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” is a good way to deal with Ma and achieve transitional justice.
However, Taiwan is a democracy with separate executive, legislative and judicial branches. We must not cook up charges at will like Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) or Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), but must follow the legal procedures for filing and investigating charges — although filing charges just to make people feel good will lead to the destruction of the nation’s democratic system.
Ma’s judicial persecution of Chen has made some in the pan-green camp feel that the administration of Tsai Ing-wen should fight back in kind, but if every president did that, would Taiwan continue to be a true democracy?
Tsai Ing-wen has shown her persistence on the issue, even allowing Ma to travel abroad, where he talks nonsense. Comparing Tsai Ing-wen with Ma will let Taiwanese know what “rule of law” really is, and deepen the nation’s democracy.
Ma is being indicted for his alleged involvement in the disposal of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) three media companies and its old headquarters building at prices below market value, causing the party to suffer financial losses of NT$7.3 billion (US$238.8 million) — the KMT should really thank the Democratic Progressive Party for helping it seek justice.
Ma was also indicted in 2007 for his handling of the special allowance account during his term as Taipei mayor, and he attempted to prove his innocence by running for president after amending a clause in the KMT’s charter excluding anyone indicted from running for president. Perhaps he should immediately announce a 2020 presidential bid and become the first presidential hopeful in that race.
Whether Ma is found guilty depends on the court. If found guilty, he would be able to appeal to a higher court. The judiciary must therefore quit its bad habit of technically delaying political cases, as it did in the cases of former Yunlin county commissioner Chang Jung-wei (張榮味), former Miaoli county commissioner Ho Chih-hui (何智輝) and Hualien County Commissioner Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁). Besides, Ma could be involved in more than one case.
The Ministry of Justice’s Investigation Bureau is responsible for investigating major criminal cases, as well as national security and the cross-strait situation. These should be the ministry’s primary tasks after the bureau’s director-general takes over as justice minister, a necessary appointment given the worsening international situation. The problem with Chinese spies entering and leaving Taiwan freely and their rampant espionage activities must be stopped.
As a democracy that values diversity and tolerance, Taiwan endures groups funded by political party assets and even Beijing’s “fifth column.” As interior minister, Hsu would hopefully pay greater attention to these issues, cooperating with prosecutors and investigators to crack down on such groups. Trying peaceful means before taking tougher action is one thing, but reform is not achieved solely by being courteous and gentle.
Apart from placing the focus on the economy, this Cabinet reshuffle will hopefully create a “war Cabinet” that will protect judicial justice and national security.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS