As part of the latest Cabinet reshuffle, Su Jain-rong (蘇建榮) is today to replace Sheu Yu-jer (許虞哲) as minister of finance. Su has served as deputy minister of finance for the past two years, so his appointment comes as no surprise.
Su served as Taipei Department of Finance commissioner from 2014 to 2016 and, before that, was a professor of public finance at National Taipei University, conducting research on finance, customs, taxation and national policy.
Su is a proven public official who has shown how to reduce bureaucratic waste and enhance communication with the media in local and central government posts. As deputy finance minister, he has honed the ability to manage the national treasury and oversee state-owned banks.
His appointment as finance minister might reflect the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration’s plan to cultivate its own high-caliber finance and economics talent.
Nevertheless, in taking the helm, Su is bound to run into the same challenges as his predecessor: the need to make further modifications to the Income Tax Act (所得稅法), to create a fairer taxation environment and a more even distribution of wealth, and to amend the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) to ensure fair allocation of resources to local governments.
The first set of amendments to the Income Tax Act, which cleared the legislative floor in January under Sheu, increases various tax deductions for wage-earners, low and middle-income earners and disabled people, as well as easing the tax burden on small businesses and innovative start-ups.
However, after taking the oath today, Su will be under pressure to launch a set of amendments modifying the way itemized deductions are calculated, because an interpretation rendered by the Council of Grand Justices on Feb. 8 last year found the law governing the calculation of income from salaries to be unconstitutional.
The act as it stands requires taxpayers to adopt a lump-sum deduction method, not an itemized deduction, when reporting expenditure.
However, the Grand Justices’ Interpretation No. 745 stipulates that this regulation constitutes discrimination between income from salaries and that from professional practice, violating the principle of equality enshrined in Article 7 of the Constitution.
The authorities are required to amend the Income Tax Act within two years, or by Feb. 9 next year.
Lawmakers have recommended increasing tax deductions for long-term care as part of the second set of amendments, and adding deductions for annuity insurance and long-term care insurance, among other items, so Su would need seasoned, competent deputies and subordinates to assist him in communicating and negotiating with majority-party and opposition lawmakers.
The revision of the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures will pose another challenge for Su, as the DPP government has promised to revise the law as soon as possible so that the financial health of local governments can be improved.
However, proposed amendments to the act have not cleared the Legislative Yuan since being tabled nearly 15 years ago, as no consensus has ever been reached between ruling-party and opposition lawmakers, or between the executive and legislative branches.
If Su wants to complete this long-delayed task, he must formulate a persuasive argument and a more viable strategy than his predecessors.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS