As part of the latest Cabinet reshuffle, Su Jain-rong (蘇建榮) is today to replace Sheu Yu-jer (許虞哲) as minister of finance. Su has served as deputy minister of finance for the past two years, so his appointment comes as no surprise.
Su served as Taipei Department of Finance commissioner from 2014 to 2016 and, before that, was a professor of public finance at National Taipei University, conducting research on finance, customs, taxation and national policy.
Su is a proven public official who has shown how to reduce bureaucratic waste and enhance communication with the media in local and central government posts. As deputy finance minister, he has honed the ability to manage the national treasury and oversee state-owned banks.
His appointment as finance minister might reflect the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration’s plan to cultivate its own high-caliber finance and economics talent.
Nevertheless, in taking the helm, Su is bound to run into the same challenges as his predecessor: the need to make further modifications to the Income Tax Act (所得稅法), to create a fairer taxation environment and a more even distribution of wealth, and to amend the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) to ensure fair allocation of resources to local governments.
The first set of amendments to the Income Tax Act, which cleared the legislative floor in January under Sheu, increases various tax deductions for wage-earners, low and middle-income earners and disabled people, as well as easing the tax burden on small businesses and innovative start-ups.
However, after taking the oath today, Su will be under pressure to launch a set of amendments modifying the way itemized deductions are calculated, because an interpretation rendered by the Council of Grand Justices on Feb. 8 last year found the law governing the calculation of income from salaries to be unconstitutional.
The act as it stands requires taxpayers to adopt a lump-sum deduction method, not an itemized deduction, when reporting expenditure.
However, the Grand Justices’ Interpretation No. 745 stipulates that this regulation constitutes discrimination between income from salaries and that from professional practice, violating the principle of equality enshrined in Article 7 of the Constitution.
The authorities are required to amend the Income Tax Act within two years, or by Feb. 9 next year.
Lawmakers have recommended increasing tax deductions for long-term care as part of the second set of amendments, and adding deductions for annuity insurance and long-term care insurance, among other items, so Su would need seasoned, competent deputies and subordinates to assist him in communicating and negotiating with majority-party and opposition lawmakers.
The revision of the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures will pose another challenge for Su, as the DPP government has promised to revise the law as soon as possible so that the financial health of local governments can be improved.
However, proposed amendments to the act have not cleared the Legislative Yuan since being tabled nearly 15 years ago, as no consensus has ever been reached between ruling-party and opposition lawmakers, or between the executive and legislative branches.
If Su wants to complete this long-delayed task, he must formulate a persuasive argument and a more viable strategy than his predecessors.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS