As part of the latest Cabinet reshuffle, Su Jain-rong (蘇建榮) is today to replace Sheu Yu-jer (許虞哲) as minister of finance. Su has served as deputy minister of finance for the past two years, so his appointment comes as no surprise.
Su served as Taipei Department of Finance commissioner from 2014 to 2016 and, before that, was a professor of public finance at National Taipei University, conducting research on finance, customs, taxation and national policy.
Su is a proven public official who has shown how to reduce bureaucratic waste and enhance communication with the media in local and central government posts. As deputy finance minister, he has honed the ability to manage the national treasury and oversee state-owned banks.
His appointment as finance minister might reflect the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration’s plan to cultivate its own high-caliber finance and economics talent.
Nevertheless, in taking the helm, Su is bound to run into the same challenges as his predecessor: the need to make further modifications to the Income Tax Act (所得稅法), to create a fairer taxation environment and a more even distribution of wealth, and to amend the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) to ensure fair allocation of resources to local governments.
The first set of amendments to the Income Tax Act, which cleared the legislative floor in January under Sheu, increases various tax deductions for wage-earners, low and middle-income earners and disabled people, as well as easing the tax burden on small businesses and innovative start-ups.
However, after taking the oath today, Su will be under pressure to launch a set of amendments modifying the way itemized deductions are calculated, because an interpretation rendered by the Council of Grand Justices on Feb. 8 last year found the law governing the calculation of income from salaries to be unconstitutional.
The act as it stands requires taxpayers to adopt a lump-sum deduction method, not an itemized deduction, when reporting expenditure.
However, the Grand Justices’ Interpretation No. 745 stipulates that this regulation constitutes discrimination between income from salaries and that from professional practice, violating the principle of equality enshrined in Article 7 of the Constitution.
The authorities are required to amend the Income Tax Act within two years, or by Feb. 9 next year.
Lawmakers have recommended increasing tax deductions for long-term care as part of the second set of amendments, and adding deductions for annuity insurance and long-term care insurance, among other items, so Su would need seasoned, competent deputies and subordinates to assist him in communicating and negotiating with majority-party and opposition lawmakers.
The revision of the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures will pose another challenge for Su, as the DPP government has promised to revise the law as soon as possible so that the financial health of local governments can be improved.
However, proposed amendments to the act have not cleared the Legislative Yuan since being tabled nearly 15 years ago, as no consensus has ever been reached between ruling-party and opposition lawmakers, or between the executive and legislative branches.
If Su wants to complete this long-delayed task, he must formulate a persuasive argument and a more viable strategy than his predecessors.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS