The China policy of all eight former US presidents from Richard Nixon, who initiated contact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 1971, to Barack Obama, was an engagement strategy based on the assumption that China’s economic liberalization would advance the nation’s democratization and maintain the “status quo” of not challenging the US-dominated East Asian security framework and order.
After 40 years of diplomatic relations with China and after the Civil Aviation Administration of China sent letters to 36 airlines around the world demanding that their Web sites not list Taiwan as a country, the US’ “Chinese dream” was finally and thoroughly shattered.
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders issued a statement that said: “We call on China to stop threatening and coercing American carriers and citizens,” adding that China’s move was “Orwellian nonsense.”
“Orwellism” is a synonym for totalitarianism: domestic surveillance controlling every person’s actions, speech and thoughts, while demanding external self-censorship to meet the CCP’s standard of what is “politically correct.”
Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) came to power, the CCP’s Orwellian style has exceeded anything that occurred during his predecessors Jiang Zemin’s (江澤民) and Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) terms.
Domestically, it applies heavier oppression of dissidents and civil society, as well as control over the Internet and social media. Internationally, it uses its power and cultural exchanges to intervene in other countries’ academic freedom, and uses incentives, pressure and intimidation to interfere with non-governmental organizations and the domestic affairs of other countries.
International relations academic David Shambaugh has said that the CCP’s essence is one of “hard authoritarianism.”
When Xi ended the “collective leadership” practice that was in place since the time of Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), by not appointing a successor at the party’s 19th National Congress last year, and the 13th Chinese National People’s Congress voted to amend the Chinese constitution to abolish presidential term limits, it became clear that Xi’s permanent hold on power was developing into neo-totalitarianism.
This runs counter to the US’ presumption that the CCP would democratize.
The repression in today’s China is the most intense since the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, Shambaugh said.
In terms of East Asian security, the timing of Xi’s abandonment of Deng’s doctrine that China should “hide its capabilities and bide its time,” demonstrates China’s attempt to become a great power.
By setting up alternative organizations, such as the New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, China has clearly expressed its discontent with the post-war order constructed by the West, while ignoring arbitration over the South China Sea sovereignty disputes, militarizing islands and reefs in the region and holding the largest military exercise in history, thus taking concrete action to change the “established ground truth.”
In addition, the CCP supports a 10-year defense modernization plan with a 12 percent annual budget increase in an attempt to destabilize the security that the US has provided in the Asia-Pacific region since 1945.
Political scientist John Mearsheimer, an international relations expert who proposed the offensive realism theory, has long predicted that China’s rise as a great power would not be peaceful and that it would attempt to rule Asia.
The US must face up to the mistakes it has made in its China strategy over the past 40 years.
For the foreseeable future, the freedom of navigation and the free and open Indo-Pacific advocated by the US in the Asia-Pacific region is likely to be regarded by the CCP as attempts to challenge its “core interests” and a threat to its national security.
Beijing will continue to establish the global code of conduct that it wants, and its Orwellian words and actions will not come to an end simply because of the White House’s condemnations.
On the contrary, they will continue to emerge for as long as emperor Xi continues to think that “I am the world.”
Masao Sun is a former director of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US’ Culture Center.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS