Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who is said to have an IQ of 157, has come up with a “rough estimate” that only 6 percent of Taiwanese could be classified as either “deep blue” or “deep green” as far as political loyalties go, and said that this 6 percent of partisan diehards have very loud voices and have “kidnapped” Taiwan.
Ko once described himself as “dark green” and, in his former role as a physician, he signed a certificate confirming that jailed former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the pan-green Democratic Progressive Party was seriously ill, which led to Chen being released on medical parole.
If the deep greens have “kidnapped” Taiwan, then given Ko’s record of “dark green” affiliations, he must also be a “kidnapper.”
He later wrote a book about “the power of the color white,” in which he theorized about a social power that was neither “deep blue” nor “deep green.” Apparently he was able to “kidnap” this other 94 percent of “white” voters to get elected mayor.
Given that the bulk of his support came from this white sector, why is he now saying sorry to deep green supporters?
Taiwan’s younger generation is said to be “naturally pro-independence,” while the generations who have lived through hardship recognize that Taiwan and China are independent of each other, and that if they want to merge, Taiwanese should have the final say.
Such a standpoint would be quite natural and in keeping with democratic principles, but Ko cannot bring himself to say it. When confronted with the issue, he would rather deal with it by playing word games and talking nonsense.
Speaking at the twin-city forums in Shanghai in 2015 and again last year, Ko said that “the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are one family,” but he has since apologized for saying so.
The disagreement between Taiwan and China is actually not one of “family” and “enemy,” but one of “one” or “two” — that is to say whether they are one country or two.
Now Ko says he spoke rashly because he “only wanted to get over the problem.” However, he not only chose to talk about a “family,” but also called it “one family,” using the key word “one” that China was so keen to hear from him.
This is an important matter that concerns the nation’s existence or disappearance, but the childish wording he used — “just to get over the problem” — expressed the standpoint of the other side.
That is not the power of white, but “red power” or even a new kind of “White Terror.”
This is such a serious matter that definitely more than just 2 or 3 percent of the population — Ko’s estimate of the deep greens — were upset by what he said.
It is a question of the speaker’s basic ideas and credibility.
However, Ko’s apology was half-hearted and insincere. He only said sorry to get over the problem.
Then he started babbling about how some people on his team were very “upset” about that particular sentence of his, and his response was to say: “Whatever you want to hear, I will say it for you.”
If Ko really means to apologize for his careless statement, it cannot be dismissed with a mere “sorry” as if it were just a petty quarrel between friends.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS