The government’s plan to raise the minimum monthly salary for public-sector workers to NT$30,000 and to raise the minimum hourly wage shows that it is taking steps toward solving the problem of low wages.
However, more government measures are required to help high-tech companies free up the capital needed to give employees decent raises, which is crucial to solving the brain drain problem.
The pay problem has plagued the nation for many years, but it has worsened recently to the point that pundits and lawmakers alike have begun calling it a national security issue.
The label people attach to low wages makes a lot of sense, considering the exodus of talented professional the nation is facing.
According to an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development report, 61.1 percent of the nation’s skilled workers in 2013 chose to work overseas, and of those, about 80 percent of the high-tech industry workers went to China.
This is the result of Chinese companies luring skilled workers by offering much higher salaries than what can be earned in Taiwan, which, in the case of Tsinghua Unigroup poaching Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s engineers, was reportedly five times their original salaries.
This siphoning effect has not only affected top high-tech firms, but also smaller ones in technology-intensive sectors, which are losing many recent graduates who are willing to work abroad for higher salaries.
The government acknowledges that these threats could greatly destabilize the nation’s working population. It should be lauded for introducing the the Act for Industrial Innovation (產業創新條例), which grants tax deductions to investment “angels” and innovative firms that contribute capital to innovative sectors, and also lifts a regulation that required shares awarded to employees linked to technology transfers to be taxed within five years.
The government could use the act as a guideline for similar policies in other sectors — such as the biotech or artificial intelligence industries — when setting qualifications that companies must meet to receive tax breaks, thereby helping them raise the capital needed to raise wages.
While it is unlikely in the short term that the average salary in the nation’s high-tech industries could match salaries in China, these policies could help local firms narrow the gap.
Once skilled workers are able to achieve a healthy equilibrium between their income and spending, they are more likely to be content with their jobs and not feel as compelled to work overseas.
In a free market, the government cannot impose a law that punishes companies that refuse to share its surplus with employees, so it is important that profitable companies realize that employees consider their jobs to be rewarding only when their efforts are sufficiently rewarded.
As high-tech industries are at the heart of the government’s industrial upgrade initiative, such firms have a crucial role to play when it comes to combating the salary problem, as the amount they pay their skilled workers will likely have a profound effect on the results of the initiative.
The pay raise unveiled by the Executive Yuan is just one step of many needed to counter low wages, but solving the national security issue would require more than government efforts.
As Premier William Lai (賴清德) has said, despite the government’s policies to promote higher salaries, it is ultimately up to the companies themselves.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS