Members of the US’ fastest-growing minority group are running for federal office, dozens of them as Democratic candidates deliberately playing up their Asian roots against a president they say demonizes the immigrants that make the US great.
The candidates include former refugees from Vietnam and children of immigrants from South Korea and India. They live in places where Asian-Pacific Americans make up a large chunk of the electorate and in places where they do not. Their chances of winning vary.
However, the candidates’ unabashed celebration of their foreign ties is notable for a group of people who have had to prove their “American-ness,” no matter how long their families have been in the nation.
Illustration: Yusha
“I think that it is partly a reaction to the current administration, which has in its policies and statements sent out a very xenophobic message,” said Democratic Representative Ted Lieu of California, who is campaigning for a third term in the US House of Representatives.
“It’s also a recognition that what makes America great is immigration and the American dream; it’s what people all over the world come to seek,” he said.
Christine Chen, executive director of the non-partisan Asian and Pacific Islander American Vote, said this year could be a watershed year for civic participation.
Asians, who make up 6 percent of the population, have traditionally lagged in voting due to language and cultural barriers and minimal outreach from political parties, she said.
For example, in the 2016 presidential election, about 49 percent of eligible Asian voters cast ballots. That was less than the 65 percent for whites and 60 percent for blacks, but slightly higher than the 48 percent for Latinos.
It is difficult to say definitively how many Asian-Pacific Americans are running for the US Congress, although The Associated Press identified at least 80 candidates of both parties. More than a dozen candidates are Republicans, and the rest are Democrats, including incumbents.
There are currently 18 Asian-Americans or Pacific Islanders in Congress — three are in the US Senate.
“What’s fascinating with the congressional candidates is that they’re coming from everywhere,” Chen said, ticking off races in Georgia, Michigan, Arizona, New Jersey and Texas. “What we’re hoping is with all these people running, and if they win, that will continue to change how people perceive the community.”
Among the candidates are nearly three dozen Asian-Pacific Americans seeking to overturn Republican seats in the House as part of a broader Democratic surge to take control of the chamber. Some of them have already been eliminated, but others have advanced.
Hamilton County Clerk of Courts Aftab Pureval won Ohio’s Democratic primary on Tuesday last week. He faces incumbent Republican Representative Steve Chabot of Ohio in November.
The Republican Party also has compelling and diverse candidates, National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Jesse Hunt said.
Republican Young Kim is a Korean-American who is on the June 5 California primary ballot.
“When my family came to this country, we came legally,” she says in a 30-second campaign ad. “Not because we wanted handouts, but because we wanted the opportunity America provided to succeed on our own.”
For former Groupon executive Suneel Gupta, a Democrat, it is precisely because of US President Donald Trump’s immigration policies that he is running for an open seat near Detroit, Michigan.
“It is literally the moment that I realized my daughter’s first president is going to be Donald Trump, and knowing that when he wants to ‘Make America Great Again,’ he wants a few less people that look like us around,” Gupta said.
Political preferences vary among Asian ethnic groups — although overall, more favor Democrats over Republicans, said Karthick Ramakrishnan, public policy professor at the University of California, Riverside and director of AAPI Data, which provides demographic information on Asian-Americans and Pacific Islanders.
About 40 percent of Asian-American voters are undecided or unaffiliated.
Asians once voted Republican, with 55 percent in 1992 choosing then-US president George H.W. Bush over Democratic presidential candidate Bill Clinton.
However, by 2012, then-US president Barack Obama received nearly 75 percent of their vote and in 2016, Asian-Pacific Americans overwhelmingly voted for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
Asian-American voters were turned off by the Republican Party and Trump rhetoric over immigration, Ramakrishnan said.
Indeed, more than 70 percent of Asian adults in the US are born abroad, according to the Pew Research Center.
Asian-American voters soured further on the Republican Party after recent proposals to limit family-based immigration, a legal method used heavily by Chinese, Indians and other Asians to come to the US.
They also expressed horror over Trump’s executive orders limiting travel from Muslim-majority countries, which they said reminded them of the Japanese-American incarceration camps during World War II.
“As the son of immigrants myself, it felt very personal, it felt very un-American,” said David Min, a law professor in Southern California who is among several Democrats challenging Republican Representative Mimi Walters.
The stereotype of Asian-Americans as “foreigners” was revived publicly when US Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke used the Japanese word konnichiwa to greet a fourth-generation American of Japanese descent.
Democratic Representative Colleen Hanabusa had just relayed the story of her grandfathers, who were incarcerated along with 120,000 other Japanese-Americans following the bombing of Pearl Harbor, their loyalty questioned by the US government.
“I was stunned,” said Hanabusa, who is running for governor of Hawaii, of Zinke’s comment. “The first thought that came to my mind was, this is why Japanese-Americans were interned.”
Pediatrician Mai Khanh Tran, who is seeking an open seat held by retiring Representative Ed Royce in Southern California’s Orange County, expressed dismay that under Trump, the nation that took her in as a nine-year-old refugee from Vietnam is closing its borders.
“This is a country that is welcoming and loving and kind and compassionate, and it has to continue for others,” she said.
In New Jersey, the party is banking on national security expert Andy Kim to beat Republican Representative Tom MacArthur, a Trump supporter who helped revive the repeal of the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare.
The district has a tiny Asian population, but Kim said he is running on his lifelong ties to a district that Obama carried twice.
Kim, whose parents emigrated from Korea, is a long-time federal employee who served in Afghanistan under General David Petraeus.
“What I want people to be thinking about is that I’m the kid next door who’s doing everything I can to fight for this land that gave my family everything,” Kim said.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS