Members of the US’ fastest-growing minority group are running for federal office, dozens of them as Democratic candidates deliberately playing up their Asian roots against a president they say demonizes the immigrants that make the US great.
The candidates include former refugees from Vietnam and children of immigrants from South Korea and India. They live in places where Asian-Pacific Americans make up a large chunk of the electorate and in places where they do not. Their chances of winning vary.
However, the candidates’ unabashed celebration of their foreign ties is notable for a group of people who have had to prove their “American-ness,” no matter how long their families have been in the nation.
Illustration: Yusha
“I think that it is partly a reaction to the current administration, which has in its policies and statements sent out a very xenophobic message,” said Democratic Representative Ted Lieu of California, who is campaigning for a third term in the US House of Representatives.
“It’s also a recognition that what makes America great is immigration and the American dream; it’s what people all over the world come to seek,” he said.
Christine Chen, executive director of the non-partisan Asian and Pacific Islander American Vote, said this year could be a watershed year for civic participation.
Asians, who make up 6 percent of the population, have traditionally lagged in voting due to language and cultural barriers and minimal outreach from political parties, she said.
For example, in the 2016 presidential election, about 49 percent of eligible Asian voters cast ballots. That was less than the 65 percent for whites and 60 percent for blacks, but slightly higher than the 48 percent for Latinos.
It is difficult to say definitively how many Asian-Pacific Americans are running for the US Congress, although The Associated Press identified at least 80 candidates of both parties. More than a dozen candidates are Republicans, and the rest are Democrats, including incumbents.
There are currently 18 Asian-Americans or Pacific Islanders in Congress — three are in the US Senate.
“What’s fascinating with the congressional candidates is that they’re coming from everywhere,” Chen said, ticking off races in Georgia, Michigan, Arizona, New Jersey and Texas. “What we’re hoping is with all these people running, and if they win, that will continue to change how people perceive the community.”
Among the candidates are nearly three dozen Asian-Pacific Americans seeking to overturn Republican seats in the House as part of a broader Democratic surge to take control of the chamber. Some of them have already been eliminated, but others have advanced.
Hamilton County Clerk of Courts Aftab Pureval won Ohio’s Democratic primary on Tuesday last week. He faces incumbent Republican Representative Steve Chabot of Ohio in November.
The Republican Party also has compelling and diverse candidates, National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Jesse Hunt said.
Republican Young Kim is a Korean-American who is on the June 5 California primary ballot.
“When my family came to this country, we came legally,” she says in a 30-second campaign ad. “Not because we wanted handouts, but because we wanted the opportunity America provided to succeed on our own.”
For former Groupon executive Suneel Gupta, a Democrat, it is precisely because of US President Donald Trump’s immigration policies that he is running for an open seat near Detroit, Michigan.
“It is literally the moment that I realized my daughter’s first president is going to be Donald Trump, and knowing that when he wants to ‘Make America Great Again,’ he wants a few less people that look like us around,” Gupta said.
Political preferences vary among Asian ethnic groups — although overall, more favor Democrats over Republicans, said Karthick Ramakrishnan, public policy professor at the University of California, Riverside and director of AAPI Data, which provides demographic information on Asian-Americans and Pacific Islanders.
About 40 percent of Asian-American voters are undecided or unaffiliated.
Asians once voted Republican, with 55 percent in 1992 choosing then-US president George H.W. Bush over Democratic presidential candidate Bill Clinton.
However, by 2012, then-US president Barack Obama received nearly 75 percent of their vote and in 2016, Asian-Pacific Americans overwhelmingly voted for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
Asian-American voters were turned off by the Republican Party and Trump rhetoric over immigration, Ramakrishnan said.
Indeed, more than 70 percent of Asian adults in the US are born abroad, according to the Pew Research Center.
Asian-American voters soured further on the Republican Party after recent proposals to limit family-based immigration, a legal method used heavily by Chinese, Indians and other Asians to come to the US.
They also expressed horror over Trump’s executive orders limiting travel from Muslim-majority countries, which they said reminded them of the Japanese-American incarceration camps during World War II.
“As the son of immigrants myself, it felt very personal, it felt very un-American,” said David Min, a law professor in Southern California who is among several Democrats challenging Republican Representative Mimi Walters.
The stereotype of Asian-Americans as “foreigners” was revived publicly when US Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke used the Japanese word konnichiwa to greet a fourth-generation American of Japanese descent.
Democratic Representative Colleen Hanabusa had just relayed the story of her grandfathers, who were incarcerated along with 120,000 other Japanese-Americans following the bombing of Pearl Harbor, their loyalty questioned by the US government.
“I was stunned,” said Hanabusa, who is running for governor of Hawaii, of Zinke’s comment. “The first thought that came to my mind was, this is why Japanese-Americans were interned.”
Pediatrician Mai Khanh Tran, who is seeking an open seat held by retiring Representative Ed Royce in Southern California’s Orange County, expressed dismay that under Trump, the nation that took her in as a nine-year-old refugee from Vietnam is closing its borders.
“This is a country that is welcoming and loving and kind and compassionate, and it has to continue for others,” she said.
In New Jersey, the party is banking on national security expert Andy Kim to beat Republican Representative Tom MacArthur, a Trump supporter who helped revive the repeal of the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare.
The district has a tiny Asian population, but Kim said he is running on his lifelong ties to a district that Obama carried twice.
Kim, whose parents emigrated from Korea, is a long-time federal employee who served in Afghanistan under General David Petraeus.
“What I want people to be thinking about is that I’m the kid next door who’s doing everything I can to fight for this land that gave my family everything,” Kim said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS