The first decision Minister of Education Wu Maw-kuen (吳茂昆) made upon taking office was significant: a swift decision to reject the appointment of Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) as National Taiwan University (NTU) president because the election process “contravened legitimate procedure.”
While the public was still wondering how NTU would react, political figures from the pan-blue and China-friendly camps fell over each other in their eagerness to criticize the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said the ministry was “even worse than the warlords of the Beiyang government,” while political commentator Wang Chien-chuang (王健壯) condemned the DPP administration for being “even more atrocious than the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).”
Kuan, quoting from a Facebook post by former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台), said that the day the decision was made would be recorded in the history books.
Analogies between the DPP and the Beiyang warlords and KMT are ridiculous.
Yet, will NTU dig in its heels and wage a “holy war” against the ministry?
The university has three possible options:
NTU has decided not to dissolve the selection committee or re-elect its members, which is tantamount to “waging no war, not retreating, not advancing and not compromising,” and saying that it will fight the ministry to the bitter end.
This will not work and the reason is simple: Last year, the NTU budget exceeded NT$6.7 billion (US$225 million) and next year’s budget is due to be submitted around September. Initiating a sweeping strategy against the ministry while begging for money from it is unlikely to be successful.
NTU’s second option is that all faculty members who belong to the old party-state structure and support Kuan resign and set up their own school, which is not unprecedented.
In September 1908, a huge student movement began at China Public School (中國公學), where Chinese philosopher and essayist Hu Shih (胡適) was enrolled.
Most students dropped out and established the China New Public School (中國新公學). They rented buildings for lectures, cooked food, hired teachers, designed curricula and attended classes, with Hu Shih temporarily serving as an English instructor.
The details can be found in Hu’s Autobiography at Forty (四十自述).
There is a group of “heroes” at NTU bedecking the campus with yellow ribbons, organizing “uprisings” and reciting ineffective “New May Fourth Movement” slogans. To make a better impression they should begin a real revolution, but they do not have the guts, influence or means to do so.
Even if they wanted to establish another university, they would have to submit the proposal to the government in compliance with the law and the new school would still be regulated by the University Act (大學法).
Honestly speaking, if they wanted to stage a real revolution, they might as well defect to China and set up a Chinese Taiwan University there, appealing to China’s united front tactics and taking their “holy war” against the education ministry to an effortless victory.
However, the best strategy would be to rely on the judiciary.
Regardless of whether a lawsuit is filed by the election committee or by Kuan and whether it is a civil or administrative lawsuit, an appeal to the Control Yuan or even a constitutional interpretation, all secrets would be revealed and Taiwanese would all find out who was right and who was wrong, as well as who trampled all over NTU’s autonomy.
Chin Heng-wei is a political commentator
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS