Protecting viewers’ rights
More than 750,000 cable television subscribers in Taoyuan, Taichung and Hsinchu and Miaoli counties have been deprived of their viewing rights since Friday last week, when cable TV providers under the umbrella of Taiwan Broadcasting Communications ceased carrying one of Formosa Television’s news channels without prior warning.
Do viewers have to put up with cable system providers breaking up channel allocations as they see fit? Do they really have no other choice, as has long been the case? If they have to wait for the National Communications Commission to impose a fine of NT$100,000 to NT$1 million (US$3,348 to US$33,476), it would take too long to be of any use.
Some subscribers are so infuriated that they say they will cancel their subscriptions, and rightly so. Canceling one’s subscription, breaking the chains and choosing digital convergence media is a great way for consumers to strike back from a disadvantageous position.
Netflix, the US’ biggest video streaming platform, now has more subscribers than cable television service providers, marking a new milestone in the rivalry between video streaming and traditional television channels.
This year, Netflix expects its subscribers to generate US$15 billion in annual revenue.
From the Netflix tide, one can foresee that Taiwan’s cable television services are not irreplaceable and will not stay dominant forever.
In Taiwan the multimedia on demand (MOD) service is a digital convergence platform that is provided via the Internet. MOD has broken free of monopoly control, and people can use it to watch FTV, NextTV and several other news channels.
It is like the end of the ban on independent newspapers that was imposed under martial law. When the ban was lifted, readers were no longer restricted to reading the three major papers, and this enabled people to broaden their horizons.
There are about 5.22 million cable television subscribers and 5.71 million broadband Internet accounts in Taiwan, but compared with watching traditional cable television, added-value digital convergence applications that could be provided over broadband have yet to become widespread.
They are an untapped market, or “blue ocean” that exists because of the asymmetry of the digital divide.
Wu Pai-hsun
Kaohsiung
Kuan isn’t fine
Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) is not fine. If he were fine, he would have been the president of the National Taiwan University (NTU) more than three months ago and he would not be crying in front of television cameras nowadays.
When Kuan was elected as president, some questions were raised, such as why he did not mention his position as an independent director of a company in his resume, why another director of the same firm was on the selection committee and why one of his papers in many places is identical to those in a paper by another author.
In response, Kuan arrogantly and snobbishly said: “I am fine!”
The general public thinks Kuan is acting like a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) member who thinks he is above the law or a high-class mainlander, rather than a future role model for NTU students, faculty and employees.
The pro-Kuan group, consisting of mainly KMT members, insists on university autonomy and no political involvement.
However, KMT legislators intruded into the minister of education’s office possibly for the first time in history. Many former KMT government officials, including former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), demonstrated on the NTU campus. NTU students were forced out of the campus and at least one was attacked by a retired diplomat.
The demonstrators even shouted at the students “Shame on you” and “Japanese running dogs.” The word “Japanese” should not be involved. The KMT should be ashamed of its lawless behavior. Society is in chaos and divided because of Kuan. Only he can solve this crisis by using his conscience.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS