Fidel and Raul Castro were scruffy young guerrillas in 1959, when they descended from Cuba’s eastern mountains, seized power and never relinquished it.
As they aged into their 80s and 90s, the Castros and their fellow fighters cast a shadow so deep that Cubans born in the first decades after the revolution became known as Cuba’s “lost generation,” men and women who spent their lives executing the orders of graying revolutionaries.
This week, Raul Castro is to step down as president after a decade in office, handing the position to a successor widely expected to be 57-year-old Cuban First Vice President Miguel Diaz-Canel.
The Thursday handoff is the centerpiece of a broader transition to a group of leaders from the lost generation, who face an unprecedented test of their ability to guide a nation that has followed the same commandantes for 60 years.
Despite a series of reforms under Castro, Cuba remains locked in grinding economic stagnation that has driven hundreds of thousands of Cubans to emigrate in search of better lives.
Change is to require potentially painful reforms, like the elimination of a dual-currency system that has created damaging economic distortions.
“A great number of this country’s young people will be watching to see if they’re capable of changing things, of offering something new, of going beyond what’s seemed like a great grayness until now,” said Yassel Padron Kunakbaeva, a 27-year-old blogger who writes frequently from what he describes as a Marxist, revolutionary perspective.
The world should expect no immediate radical change from a single-party system dedicated to stability above all else. Raul Castro is to remain first secretary of the Communist Party of Cuba, described by the Cuban constitution as the nation’s “highest guiding force.”
Raul Castro has said nothing publicly about how he is to use that position, but Cuban leaders have been making clear that a generational handover is underway.
On Feb. 24, Raul Castro awarded one of Cuba’s highest honors, the title Hero of Labor, to fellow guerrillas Jose Ramon Machado Ventura, an 87-year-old vice president and second secretary of the Communist Party, as well as to 85-year-old Vice President Ramiro Valdes and 90-year-old former rebel leader and Vice President Guillermo Garcia Frias.
For many Cubans, the elaborate ceremony in the soaring, newly reopened neoclassical National Capitol Building had a valedictory tone, a sign that the powerful Valdes and Machado Ventura are to have far less important roles in Diaz-Canel’s administration.
While the inner workings of the Cuban government are opaque, both men were widely perceived as conservatives slowing reform.
“We’re practically already in that future that’s been talked about so much, that a moment of transition had to arrive,” Machado Ventura told state television last month. “Now it’s generational. It has to materialize, has to be that way.”
Along with Diaz-Canel, a group of middle-aged leaders are being closely watched as candidates for more powerful positions.
They include 60-year-old Minister of Foreign Affairs Bruno Rodriguez, 54-year-old Havana party leader Mercedes Lopez Acea, 57-year-old economic reform czar Marino Murillo and 63-year-old Lazaro Exposito, party head in Cuba’s second-most-populated province, Santiago.
Behind the scenes, Raul Castro’s 52-year-old son, Alejandro, is a powerful figure in the Cuban Ministry of the Interior, and secretly negotiated the reopening of diplomatic relations with the US under former US president Barack Obama.
Castro’s former son-in-law, General Luis Alberto Rodriguez Lopez-Callejas, also in his 50s or 60s, runs the economic arm of Cuba’s military, which controls a vast swathe of state-run businesses ranging from tourism to shipping.
Born in the years after the Cuban revolution, leaders from the lost generation lack the credentials of their revolutionary predecessors, who were adored by some, despised by others, but always recognized as figures of historical importance endowed with popular credibility among Cubans on the island by their actions on the battlefield.
Diaz-Canel and his cohort of middle-aged leaders rose through the Communist Party bureaucracy thanks to their success in local governance.
“This government that we’re choosing today will be a government that will owe its existence to the people,” Diaz-Canel told state-run media after voting for members of the National Assembly last month. “The people will participate in the decisions that this government takes.”
Whatever his style, the Cuba that Diaz-Canel is to lead is radically different from the nation that he knew as both a child and a younger adult.
For those growing up in pro-revolutionary families in the heyday of Soviet aid to Cuba, the socialist state was a paternalistic presence that provided modest but comfortable lives to virtually everyone on the island. Russian products filled the stores and Russian cartoons played on Cuban television.
“There was the sensation that we were living very happily, everyone mixed together, with no pressure to earn money in the marketplace,” 55-year-old fine art curator Abelardo Mena said.
Mena remembers receiving three nearly free toys a year from the government and never worrying about his parents putting enough food on the table. There were ample supplies of coffee, Russian television sets and wristwatches, and canned meat from Bulgaria.
Instead of defending their homeland, Diaz-Canel’s generation fought overseas in wars waged by Cuban forces alongside Soviet allies in Angola and Nicaragua.
For those who disagreed with the communist system, times were harsh. The government organized public gatherings to “repudiate” those who spoke against the system or wanted to emigrate. Gay people and even mild dissenters were sent to work camps, “hippies” forced to cut their hair and hide their rock-and-roll records in album covers of more acceptable musicians.
Life changed dramatically after the fall of the Soviet Union, which nearly eliminated Cuba’s exports and imports, and cut gross domestic product by more than 30 percent in a crisis known as the Special Period. There were blackouts, shortages and questions about domestic and foreign policy.
“We realized we weren’t saving much. We weren’t ready for the Special Period. Cuba spent 15 years fighting wars in Africa. We gave a lot away for nothing,” said Carlos Alberto Careaga, a 52-year-old parking attendant at Havana’s Commodore Hotel.
Diaz-Canel’s generation was marked by three waves of mass migration from Cuba. About 125,000 people fled in 1980, when Fidel Castro allowed free migration from the port of Mariel outside Havana.
The Special Period saw tens of thousands more Cubans fleeing on homemade rafts, and Raul Castro’s elimination of mandatory exit permits for most Cubans saw hundreds of thousands other Cubans leave over the past decade.
As a result of the migratory waves, hundreds of thousands of Cubans in their 50s and 60s have regular contact with friends and relatives in other nations, a sharp distinction from Cuba’s original revolutionaries.
That increased contact with the outside world is boosted by a broad set of changes implemented by Raul Castro that include the spread of cell phones and Internet, and a private sector that has come to employ nearly 600,000 Cubans.
Cuban officials did not respond to requests for interviews with Diaz-Canel and other leaders expected to assume higher profiles when a new Cuban government is seated this month.
In occasional public statements, Diaz-Canel has given indications of support for some of those changes and hostility toward others, but his most defining characteristic in recent years has been his low public profile.
Many Cubans believe he has been trying to avoid the fate of men like former vice president Carlos Lage and former minister of foreign affairs Felipe Perez Roque, young stars who rose to prominence under Fidel Castro and were pushed out of power in the first years of Raul Castro’s presidency.
“Diaz-Canel has spent years in a very uncomfortable position. No one of his generation has managed to get to the level he’s at, and that creates a certain amount of tension,” said Harold Cardenas, a pro-revolutionary blogger whose work has been supported by Diaz-Canel.
After years in the shadows, Diaz-Canel and his generation must now show they are able to lead a nation facing deep economic problems, a hostile US administration, dwindling ranks of regional allies and increasing disenchantment among younger generations of Cubans.
However, less than a week before a new president takes office, many Cubans are unconvinced leaders from the lost generation will be able to fix the problems they have inherited from the founders of communist Cuba.
“This generation hasn’t been able to make any proposals of its own, and those who’ve shown initiative have paid a heavy price,” said Armando Chaguaceda, a Cuban political scientist at the University of Guanajuato, Mexico. “It’s a very gray generation, or so they’d have us believe.”
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
Liberals have wasted no time in pointing to Karol Nawrocki’s lack of qualifications for his new job as president of Poland. He has never previously held political office. He won by the narrowest of margins, with 50.9 percent of the vote. However, Nawrocki possesses the one qualification that many national populists value above all other: a taste for physical strength laced with violence. Nawrocki is a former boxer who still likes to go a few rounds. He is also such an enthusiastic soccer supporter that he reportedly got the logos of his two favorite teams — Chelsea and Lechia Gdansk —