It is a gray, overcast day late last month, and the town of Bialowieza, a small settlement in northeastern Poland, looks undisturbed — almost uninhabited.
However, until a few weeks ago, it was not unusual to see protests there featuring banner-wielding demonstrators and government officials arriving in black sedans, escorted by the police.
At issue is a series of large-scale logging operations in the nearby forest, which shares a name with the town.
Bialowieza, a UNESCO World Heritage site, is the largest remaining part of the primeval forest that once stretched across much of Europe.
Besides causing rifts in the local community, the dispute over the forest has put further strain on the relationship between the nation’s right-wing government and the EU, leading to a legal battle that is still continuing.
Late last month, the advocate-general of the European Court of Justice said Poland had infringed EU laws by increasing logging in the Bialowieza forest over the previous two years.
The opinion is not binding, and the European court is to make a final ruling in the coming months.
Poland, which defied two previous orders to halt logging in the forest, has said it would comply with the EU’s final ruling.
Opponents of logging have welcomed the government’s statement as a vindication of their efforts, but many believe the forest is still in danger.
“This government is not to be trusted,” said Adam Bohdan, a biologist with the Wild Poland Foundation in Warsaw, during a visit to several logging sites.
Pointing to a heavily deforested area near the village of Czerlonka, he said: “The major concern is that this can happen again in the future unless some measures to enhance the protection of the forest are taken.”
Unlike the portion of the forest across the border in Belarus, which is entirely protected by UNESCO, the Polish forest is split into a natural park reserve and a commercial forest.
The commercial side is managed by State Forests, a government body that runs Polish forests and controls almost the entire national timber market, generating raw material worth more than 10 billion euros (US$12 billion) annually.
“State Forests are requested to be financially [self]-sufficient,” Bodhan said.
That means they care less about trees and biodiversity, he said, and more about “earning more money, and the Bialowieza forest has a plentiful supply of valuable wood.”
State Forests officials did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
Logging is only prohibited inside the reserve, a protected area that contains woodland largely untouched by people for thousands of years.
However, the reserve accounts for just 17 percent of the total forest area of 150,000 hectares, leaving the remainder vulnerable.
Borders are not always clear, causing quarrels over how far into the forest harvesters can go.
In January, State Forests said that two out of the forest’s three administrative units had already felled 98 percent of the timber quota set until 2021, and that they were planning to increase their quotas.
The announcement alarmed environmentalists, since the current dispute erupted when the government in 2016 tripled logging limits in one of the administrative units, saying the forest was in danger due to an outbreak of bark beetle.
“The best solution to prevent large-scale logging from happening again in the future is the simplest one with the longest history of political opposition: expanding the national park over more of the forest,” said Eunice Blavascunas, a cultural anthropologist at Whitman College in the US.
“This is far from being an easy task,” said Blavascunas, who has studied conservation politics in new nature preserves in Poland for more than 15 years.
Although it constitutes a tiny proportion of all Polish forests, the Bialowieza forest holds a highly symbolic place in the national consciousness.
“The Bialowieza forest is unlike any other for Poles,” said Bogdan Jarosewicz, director of Bialowieza Geobotanical Station at Warsaw University. “It’s a national emblem, and it’s unlikely that a nationalist government relentlessly appealing to national identity will give up on that.”
In any case, foresters and hunters are a key part of the ruling party’s electoral support, and many of them are part of the entrenched local opposition to enlarging the national reserve, Jarosewicz added.
“Many people here have worked as foresters for generations or have relatives who [did], and they are staunchly convinced that there is no harm in exploiting the forest in the way they have for hundreds of years,” he said.
Driving through the maze of roads within the forest, people’s visceral connection to the woods is evident. Woodpiles stand by timber homes in the villages, and the smell of wood smoke drifts in even the remotest places.
Residents can be blunt in their views.
“Poland has the right to use its own resources as it sees fit, without a bunch of highly paid bureaucrats to set the agenda,” said Elzbieta Laprus, president of Bialowieza’s village council.
Bogdan Brzeziecki, a forestry scientist working for the department of silviculture of Warsaw University of Life Sciences, also thinks that expanding the preserve is not the answer.
“In the case of Bialowieza we should find a compromise between strict protection and a multifunctional forest management model,” he said. “We’d need such a model for every forest in Poland.”
Several attempts to enlarge the forest preserve have been made over the past two decades, but none has succeeded — and the divide between those who support a managed forest and those who believe it should be left alone does not appear to be closing.
A 2014 study by Polish and Swedish scientists blamed a lack of clear information for local residents and a lack of transparent decisionmaking for the failure to reach a consensus.
“Future enlargement initiatives should be developed in cooperation with local people and accompanied by an appropriate information campaign to be effective,” said Grzegorz Mikusinski, a coauthor of the study from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Blavascunas sees one potential solution.
If the government were to buy abandoned farmland on the outskirts of the forest and plant trees there, a larger core of the ancient forest could be preserved, she said.
“This could be an incremental process that gradually eases social tensions, and replaces conservation zones with marketable trees,” she said. “But it takes political will to make this happen and I’m not sure Poland has plenty of it right now.”
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS