Ever since US President Donald Trump announced that the US would levy tariffs on about US$60 billion worth of Chinese products, politicians, businesspeople, academics and the media in Taiwan have fretted that Taiwanese businesses would also be hit. This is not necessarily the case.
The concept informing Trump’s policy is simple: reciprocity. It is an idea that runs counter to the WTO’s concept of free trade.
The WTO’s ideal is that, after every country has abolished tariffs, each could make the product it can produce most efficiently for others on the global market. This rather naive ideal overlooks the fact that the natural and human resources that each country has are not mutually exclusive. That is, other nations also have the ability to produce the kind of products that another nation makes.
The market deregulation that the WTO demands has also put some nations at a disadvantage. Since they cannot make their own products as efficiently as other nations can, their industry is decimated by imports.
Meanwhile, relatively late developers are not given the opportunity to upgrade their production through technology transfers from more advanced nations by deregulating certain sectors within their domestic markets.
It is no surprise that the WTO is entangled in multilateral talks among nations over political and economic conflicts, as this underlying principle was flawed from the outset.
In the post-war period, Taiwanese trade relied on the labor market, such as with original equipment manufacturing, and the domestic market in exchange for foreign capital and technological transfers. This kind of exchange was true reciprocity. Taiwan’s manufacturing sector now enjoys many business opportunities in global markets, and it no longer has to rely on lower prices, as it can offer international customers added value.
Taiwan has not benefited much from the WTO over the past two decades and the majority of Taiwanese businesses still have to deal with high tariffs in other nations.
Meanwhile, nations and alliances like Japan, South Korea, China and the EU benefit from the WTO framework, as they are able to enter bilateral or multilateral talks with other nations and expand their international markets.
For the Trump administration, given what it sees as the considerable harm the WTO has done to US manufacturing and jobs, the introduction of tariffs to protect domestic industry and jobs is a reasonable response.
Trump has encouraged foreign companies, such as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, and reduced taxes to bring US companies back home. These policies share an internal logic.
Over the past 20 years, under the influence of the WTO framework, Taiwan has forged a niche manufacturing model, giving the nation a unique competitiveness in the international market. Taiwanese companies are able to accept relatively small orders for precision manufacturing from different nations. In this, the nation is unrivaled. Is this new model not the best response to the Trump administration’s call for reciprocity in international trade?
In anticipation of what Taiwan’s involvement in the US’ Section 301 investigation of China’s unfair trade practices would mean for the nation’s industry over the next 15 years or so, this can be seen as a great opportunity for Taiwan to work toward a more reciprocal model of engagement with other nations.
Given the already good relations between Taiwan and the US, the government should capitalize on this opportunity to be the “most-favored political and economic partner” of other nations.
Huang Chin-yin is chairman of Tunghai University’s Department of Industrial Engineering and Enterprise Information.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS