On Jan. 9, the US House of Representatives unanimously passed the Taiwan Travel Act, and on Feb. 28, it was also passed by the Senate.
When it landed on US President Donald Trump’s desk, he did not veto it, nor did he passively let it take effect; instead he signed it into law on March 16.
The passage of the act, which encourages high-level exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials, is significant for several reasons.
First, while it may be a minor issue for the US, it is a major step forward for Taiwan. US officials at all levels can visit friendly nations without any problems, but if another country wants to invite the US president, they have to wait in line.
For the US, including Taiwan in this treatment might just be a matter of gilding the lily, but for Taiwan, whose few remaining diplomatic allies rarely take the initiative to offer a gift, the Taiwan Travel Act is timely help to a friend in need.
In the past, Taiwanese presidents have only been able to transit through the US when visiting diplomatic allies, and there have been restrictions in who they can meet and talk to. These restrictions have now been relaxed and Taiwan can now enter the US through its main entrance, and that is a great improvement.
Second, it allows Taiwan to differentiate between friend an foe. The Taiwan Travel Act is a friendly gesture toward Taiwan and that is a good thing.
China, on the other hand, has been protesting and said that the act would have severe consequences for US-China relations since Congress started to promote the act.
In an editorial on Jan. 10, state-run tabloid the Global Times said that the act was a “Taiwan Destruction Act,” and that “once the act formally becomes law, China will liberate Taiwan with armed force.”
They could not have made it clearer who is and who is not Taiwan’s friend.
Third, Taiwan must choose the right side: Taiwan is squeezed between the US and China because Beijing makes it clear that it has territorial ambitions and claims sovereignty over Taiwan. That makes it clear that Taiwan in practice has no choice, as the only choice on offer is between the free and democratic US, a country that respects human rights, or an authoritarian, dictatorial China.
When it comes to making this choice, Taiwan can never take lightly the possibility that it might be sold out.
In the US, even a small bill like the Taiwan Travel Act must pass through the House of Representatives and the Senate before being signed by the president.
In China, even a major thing like amending the constitution is decided by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) alone.
Surely it is easier for China than for the US to sell Taiwan down the river.
Finally, Taiwan must be courageous enough to follow its own path. The passage of the act angered Beijing, which sent its aircraft carrier Liaoning through the Taiwan Strait on March 20.
So what? Taiwan is not here to please China.
China is hostile to Taiwan and that means that there is a big chance that anything that is bad for China is good for Taiwan: Every time China tells Taiwan not to do something, Taiwan should consider the feasibility of doing it.
Taiwan has already been blocked from almost every international organization and it has been a long time since China changed from being an economic partner to being a competitor. The only trick left to China is to take all Taiwan’s diplomatic allies.
So what? What would be the difference if these insignificant countries remained Taiwan’s diplomatic allies or not?
To be blunt, the earlier Taiwan stops believing in the importance of the number of diplomatic allies it has, the sooner it will be ready to face a brighter future.
We must let China know that with the act and true friendship with Japan that has developed following the 2011 earthquake and tsunami, Taiwan stands to lose nothing even if it does not have a single diplomatic ally.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education and a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS