France set up a national archive in 1790, the first country to do so. The establishment of the French National Archives has had far-reaching effects on how other nations handle their documents.
For example, such archives should store the documents and files produced by a national government, a national archive network should be set up and the archives should belong to the general public and be accessible to it.
The establishment of the National Archives in Taiwan has been a frustrated development: It was only recently decided that they should be set up in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口). Construction of the archives is to be completed by 2023, a full 233 years after those of France.
Newly independent countries around the world have prioritized the establishment of national archives at an early stage: As documents are the foundation of every state, it is only by the uniqueness and reliability of these documents that the existence of the state can be proved.
The files and documents produced by the central government have a direct bearing on the development of Taiwan as a whole, including politics, the economy, fiscal matters, and military and foreign affairs. Because of their significance, it is expected that the National Archives would mainly collect and store the documents produced by the central government and its departments and agencies.
Although the archives are to have up to 100km of shelf space for document storage, the National Archives Administration already has 30km worth of documents. This leaves only 70km of shelving to store the documents that the central government is to produce over the next 20 to 30 years.
If the documents produced by the central and local governments are not kept separate, the archives will soon be filled up. A plan should be implemented to store primarily just the important documents produced by the central government and its departments and agencies at the facility.
While documents from local governments are also important, they should not be kept at national archives. Instead, they should be kept at county and city-level facilities set up by those local governments.
The six special municipalities should establish their own archives, making it more convenient for residents in these cities to get access to documents directly related to the local population.
If documents produced by the Pingtung County Government were kept in New Taipei City, county residents would have to travel quite a distance to gain access to county documents. This would not be a very convenient solution for local residents.
For this reason, documents produced by local governments in European and North American countries are kept at local public archives rather than at the national facilities.
Hsueh Li-kuei is director of National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS