Beginning this year, the government plans to help businesses obtain privileged loans from banks to remove 80,000 aging diesel trucks from roads and to gradually replace 10,000 fossil-fuel-powered buses with electric ones, in an attempt to improve air quality in the nation’s central and southern regions, Premier William Lai (賴清德) told the Legislative Yuan earlier this month.
At the same time, a Cabinet proposal to amend the Air Pollution Act (空氣汙染防制法) is a priority bill awaiting legislative review during the current session.
The Executive Yuan in December last year announced plans to replace government vehicles and buses with electric versions by 2030, and ban the sale of motorcycles and cars with fossil-fuel-powered engines in 2035 and 2040 respectively, in a bid to reduce the number of air quality “red alert” days by half.
The government’s policy initiative is headed in the right direction, because a major source of air pollution in Taiwan is motor vehicles. With so many cars, buses, scooters and trucks on the roads every day, motor vehicles contribute about one-third of the nation’s air pollution, compared with another one-third generated by domestic industries.
Moreover, promoting electric cars and scooters is a global trend, as Norway plans to stop selling fossil-fuel-powered vehicles by 2025, and Germany, India, Finland and the Netherlands intend to do so by 2030, with the UK, France and the US to follow suit by 2040. China is also gearing up to promote electric cars to tackle one of the world’s worst air pollution problems, with more than 100 Chinese cities to have their gasoline-powered scooters replaced with electric ones by 2030.
A number of local companies already manufacture electric car batteries, motors, control systems and car components, as Taiwan has the world’s leading technology supply chain and companies are known for their flexibility in devising effective solutions.
However, government support is crucial to boosting electric vehicle use in the nation. Now that a reasonable timeline has been set for switching to electric vehicles, consumers and businesses would like the government to expand on related policies, provide detailed measures and improve incentives that could work together to help popularize “green” vehicles over the next two decades.
Critics are alarmed by a lack of demand for these vehicles, despite increasing concern over how vehicle emissions contribute to air pollution.
Last year, 831 new electric cars and 44,100 new electric scooters were registered in Taiwan, representing just 0.19 percent of the 444,624 cars and 4.41 percent of the 999,654 scooters sold in the nation, according to statistics compiled by the Ministry of Transportation and Communications.
High prices have frustrated sales of electric vehicles in Taiwan, while battery capacity, charging times and the availability of charging points or battery exchange stations continue to be barriers.
There are many hurdles to be overcome and the initial stage of any new initiative is typically the most difficult, but the government has a critical role to play.
The public sector must lead the way in phasing out gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles. Only then will the government be able to leverage the strength of local industry partners to make electric cars affordable to a mass market and hopefully bring Taiwan-made vehicles and battery-charging solutions to the world.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS