The time and place were grim. The country’s population had doubled in a century and tillable land for farming was becoming scarce. Then came a three-year cycle of heavy rains and drought that drove many from their land, hungry, to seek new economic opportunities abroad.
Faced with such hardship, 60,000 people fled during these three years to the US. Many more, in a familiar pattern, would follow those first migrants in the years to come to the communities they founded.
If this story sounds utterly modern in its familiarity, it is not, because the country described above is not Haiti or El Salvador or an African nation — places reportedly derided this week as “shitholes” by US President Donald Trump (who now denies he used precisely these words). Instead, it describes a Scandinavia — or more precisely the Sweden of the mid-1860s — whose migrants would become one of the engines of the US push west, with many settling in the prairies of the Midwest.
Illustration: Yusha
It was not only poor Swedes who came to the US looking for a better future. The reality is that migration to the US has long been fuelled by grinding poverty and inequality, and the promise of something better.
Irish immigrants left for broadly similar reasons to the Swedes and other Scandinavians. The 4 million Italians who arrived in the US between 1880 and 1924 — half of them in the decade between 1900 and 1910 — were often from the poorest, rural backgrounds.
Just as familiar as those waves of migration — and the factors driving them — is the response of nativists such as Trump.
The US is a nation built on migration and cheap labor from disadvantaged countries, but each nativist moment in its history has been accompanied by similar rhetoric, words that have treated an impoverished or troubled place of origin as a judgement on those fleeing, rather than seeing them simply as victims of circumstance.
For the Know Nothing movement of the 1850s, and the American Party it briefly spawned — whose views have so much in common with the current anti-Muslim sentiment of Trump’s populist moment — that hostility was aimed at poor Irish Catholic migrants. It feared they would take jobs and move into positions of influence, not least in government, while maintaining allegiance to the pope.
While the Know Nothings quickly imploded over the question of slavery, they set a template for all the periodic outbreaks of nativism that would follow. The origin of migrants, it would be argued again and again by populist politicians, made them inferior. Their arrival threatened jobs and their tendencies were criminal. Their beliefs were inimical to traditional US values.
Twenty years after the Know Nothings, the same sentiment re-emerged as fear of Chinese immigrant labor, gaining enough traction to see the passage in 1882 of the Chinese Exclusion Act severely limiting future immigration and barring Chinese residents from obtaining US citizenship — the first major piece of US anti-immigration legislation. That in turn would be followed by the Immigration Acts of 1921 and 1924 restricting the immigration of European and Asian immigrants.
If Trump’s “shithole” comments are unsurprising, it is because he has built a political movement on these kinds of judgments. It was of Mexico, during his the campaign, that he suggested “when [it] sends its people, they’re not sending their best, they’re bringing crime, they’re rapists.”
For Trump, similar to the US nativist movements that preceded him, only the white and wealthy are attractive as new US residents — such as the wealthy Norwegians of today — not the Scandinavians of the 1860s. What he forgets — perhaps more likely does not know — is that the US was built by those migrating from what a Trump of that era would have doubtless called “shitholes.”
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
A recent scandal involving a high-school student from a private school in Taichung has reignited long-standing frustrations with Taiwan’s increasingly complex and high-pressure university admissions system. The student, who had successfully gained admission to several prestigious medical schools, shared their learning portfolio on social media — only for Internet sleuths to quickly uncover a falsified claim of receiving a “Best Debater” award. The fallout was swift and unforgiving. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University and Taipei Medical University revoked the student’s admission on Wednesday. One day later, Chung Shan Medical University also announced it would cancel the student’s admission. China Medical
Construction of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County’s Hengchun Township (恆春) started in 1978. It began commercial operations in 1984. Since then, it has experienced several accidents, radiation pollution and fires. It was finally decommissioned on May 17 after the operating license of its No. 2 reactor expired. However, a proposed referendum to be held on Aug. 23 on restarting the reactor is potentially bringing back those risks. Four reasons are listed for holding the referendum: First, the difficulty of meeting greenhouse gas reduction targets and the inefficiency of new energy sources such as photovoltaic and wind power. Second,
RSS