Following the passage of the Act on Promoting Transitional Justice (促進轉型正義條例), loyalists of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) have been saying were it not for Chiang, Taiwan would long ago have been overrun by the Chinese communists, and many Taiwanese lives would have been lost. They have been saying Taiwan’s economic prosperity owes everything to Chiang.
During the Second Sino-Japanese War, Chiang spent three years holed up on Mount Emei in China’s Sichuan Province, and had to pull back to Chong-qing. Were it not for the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it would have all been over for Chiang, who still balked at appearing in Nanjing to receive the Japanese Instrument of Surrender from Japanese General Yasuji Okamura on Sept. 9, 1945, sending General He Yingqin (何應欽) instead.
With the defeat in China and retreat to Taiwan, Chiang sent then-Taiwan governor Chen Yi (陳儀) to pillage Taiwan and instigate the 228 Massacre.
As if that were not enough, he then announced a change of currency, with 40,000 of the old Taiwanese dollar being exchanged for a single New Taiwan dollar, making countless Taiwanese instantly bankrupt. This author’s family had been saving to build a three-story hotel on 660m2 of land in front of Kaohsiung train station. Their money became worthless overnight.
Chiang brought gold and valuable artifacts over to Taiwan, but what of the 600,000 starving soldiers in his tattered army? Had the Korean War not broken out, and the US Navy not sent its Seventh Fleet into the Taiwan Strait to prevent the communists invading, would Chiang’s exhausted, petrified rabble of an army been able to resist the Eighth Route Army? Had the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) not stolen from Taiwanese, would its troops have survived at all?
Chiang then began a policy of buttering up farmers with the “375 rent reduction” initiative and allowing them to own land. He invested special powers in a group of banshan (半山, “half mountain”) Taiwanese — born here, but having spent time serving in China — to govern Taiwan with these Taiwanese lackeys, while holding unfair elections and setting the secret police on any dissidents.
The 1970s were given over to heavy industry, with ship-breakers responsible for large amounts of polluting dioxins and processing factories exploiting labor, including many plants in Kaohsiung’s Cianjhen District.
The government for years gave Japanese investors tax exemptions. They built many electric goods processing plants that used children as cheap labor.
At the time, the author helped a few friends, fresh out of jail, to set up a self-service buffet joint in Cianjhen market. The female workers in the nearby processing plants earned a pittance, and were surviving by spending NT$5 for a bowl of rice with two vegetable sides, and eating even less for breakfast — only gruel topped with pickled duck eggs.
Taiwan’s success is built on the toil of workers such as these.
The signature of Chiang — or that of his son and successor, former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — was needed for every death sentence handed to political dissidents speaking out against their savage rule.
It is only because of those who fought for democracy that people today can vote.
Back in those days, people would be forced to go to the local assembly hall and line up in front of a statue of Chiang on Oct. 31, the anniversary of his birth. A friend in the line asked, in Taiwanese, why we were worshiping the devil. His comment was overheard and reported. My friend spent a decade behind bars for that, together with three years of disciplinary education.
What exactly is it we have to thank Chiang for?
Shih Ming-hsiung is a political victim.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS