While Premier William Lai (賴清德) at a breakfast meeting with business leaders on Tuesday last week urged companies to raise salaries, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀) said that salaries should be left up to a free labor market.
Although TSMC’s salaries are not a cause for concern to the government, lawful corporate governance is a basic social duty for companies, and Lai should remember that whether companies raise salaries is something that the government is legally empowered to monitor.
The Company Act (公司法) was in May 2015 amended by adding Article 235-1, the first sentence of which reads: “A fixed amount or ratio of profit of the current year distributable as employees’ compensation shall be definitely specified in the Articles of Incorporation.”
This regulation aims to resolve the problem of low wages, but it only talks in terms of “shall,” without imposing any penalties, thus letting employers off the hook. Consequently, not many companies pay their employees a fixed amount or ratio of the profit as compensation, as the article requires.
TSMC is a good company, with Articles of Incorporation that say: “Before paying dividends or bonuses to shareholders, this corporation shall set aside ... not less than 1 percent [of its annual profits] as profit-sharing bonuses to its employees.”
While setting the bonuses at not less than 1 percent of annual profits, TSMC still makes employees’ profit-sharing bonuses subject to a majority vote by its board of directors — which does not meet the standards of good corporate governance.
If this is the case at TSMC, what hope is there for the salaries at other companies?
Taiwan does not value labor highly and is not willing to recognize workers as social partners, as Germany does. Unlike Germany, Taiwan does not allow workers’ representatives to stand on an equal footing with those representing employers and the government to negotiate commodity prices and wage policies or discuss financial issues such as income distribution.
Hence, the premier is seen discussing salary and investment matters at a breakfast meeting, with no regard to the frustrations encountered by those who work hard for low wages.
Taiwan could follow the example of Germany’s “free economic system with social justice” by constructing a comprehensive economic, social and legal framework to guarantee workers’ rights to rest, recreation, vacations, educational development and cultural participation.
This enables employees to understand their companies’ production and operation situations and monitor how their companies are implementing laws that affect employee rights and interests.
Amendments were made to the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) at the end of last year and went into effect at the beginning of this year.
However, employers have obstructed the changes and avoided implementing them by forcing the central government to give them “guidance” time and then pressing for new amendments. This obstruction has left local governments at their wits’ end, while ordinary people suffer the consequences.
The end of the year is approaching, with new amendments to the Labor Standards Act yet to be enacted, but Lai has said that the last set of changes regarding weekly rest days can be amended again.
If the Ministry of Labor cannot make comprehensive and practical plans regarding the Labor Standards Act, the shoddy legal system will continue to leave workers feeling confused and helpless.
Lin Terng-yaw is a lawyer.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS