As expected, the legislature has done the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) bidding and “corrected” the Referendum Act (公民投票法) so that it cannot be used to create a “Taiwanese” constitution, change the nation’s name or decide the nation’s future.
Complete, open and unlimited referendum rights are a fundamental component of a free society. Without comprehensive referendum rights, Taiwanese are not true masters, nor are they truly free: They are simply slaves of the DPP — and of external forces.
The result of the amendment to the Referendum Act tells us that every single one of the DPP legislators shares the guilt for depriving Taiwanese of comprehensive referendum rights and the right to become free. The DPP has become a political and economic comprador that stands between external forces and Taiwanese.
If the Referendum Act really is a procedural act, as the DPP has said, then it should not contain any exclusion clauses.
Supporting a comprehensive, open and unrestricted Referendum Act means supporting Taiwanese democracy, freedom and human rights.
It is not the same as supporting a referendum on Taiwanese independence, nor does it mean supporting Taiwanese independence — it simply means supporting the fundamental right of Taiwanese to choose.
If the DPP fears that Taiwanese would write their own constitution, there is ample opportunity for the party to oppose their pursuit of independence and autonomy.
Consider the creation of a Taiwanese constitution as an example. Every stage of the process — from the initialization, proposal, signature drive, acceptance and debate to a vote on a constitutional referendum — offers the DPP an opportunity to oppose the measure. There is no need to remove the public’s right to choose by amending the act.
Crippling the right of Taiwanese to choose in this way is even worse than opposing the creation of a new constitution or the right of Taiwanese to self-determination.
The “correction” to the Referendum Act shows that the DPP has closed the door on peaceful and non-violent self-determination within the framework of the established system.
From now on, the DPP will have to shoulder all responsibility for any violence or social unrest that results from Taiwanese pursuing a new constitution and a new national name.
The process that led to the “correction” to the act shows that every DPP legislator either silently accepts or loudly agrees to follow every order issued by the party’s leader, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).
This makes one wonder whether the DPP is still a democratic party or if it has become just another party that will deceive and engage in “democratic” centralism to serve its agenda.
The “correction” to the act shows that there are no longer any factions within the DPP that are working toward democracy, freedom, self-determination or, of course, independence. The only factions left in the DPP are those that do what they are told and those that want to further their own interests.
I have supported the democracy movement, through the tangwai (黨外, outside the party) movement and then the DPP for the past 40 years, but today I must finally accept that the DPP is possessed by an evil demon.
It is no longer the DPP that I once knew.
Until an exorcist ousts this evil demon from the party, I can only say: “Bye bye, DPP.”
Lin Kien-tsu is a member of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS