The pursuit of transitional justice in Taiwan has encountered several hurdles, with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) naturally leading the opposition. However, there is one strong hurdle that is harder to tackle: ordinary people who are easily manipulated and put money above values.
In addition to redressing injustices committed during the Martial Law era, another major task for the ad hoc commission for the promotion of transitional justice under the Executive Yuan to be formed after the Act on Promoting Transitional Justice (促進轉型正義條例) was passed on Tuesday last week is the removal of symbols in public buildings and spaces that commemorate or honor Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石).
Calls have been made sporadically to eradicate such symbols, most notably statues of Chiang in public schools and the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei — a 15,000m2 shrine honoring the nation’s most notorious dictator. However, such calls have traditionally mostly been bottom-up initiatives, given that the government did not create a legal basis for the statues’ removal until earlier this month.
Many people have sought to draw attention to the absurdity of continuing to worship Chiang in democratic Taiwan by spraying red paint on his statues on his birthday or anniversaries of White Terror era atrocities, and it is reasonable to say that without these instances of civil disobedience, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration would not have felt confident that it had enough public backing to railroad the act through the Legislative Yuan.
The passage of the act is a new milestone in the nation’s democratization and could further anoint the DPP as the nation’s driver of democratic consolidation. However, the ruling party has found itself faced with piling pressure from authoritarian sympathizers and people who simply do not care about transitional justice, because justice is an intangible value that cannot put food in their stomachs.
Immediately after the act’s passage, some pan-blue news media were quick to estimate the amount of money needed for the implementation of the act, in an apparent attempt to steer public opinion and paint transitional justice as a pointless, money-consuming and politically motivated endeavor.
The tactic seems to be working, given that the DPP administration has tried to downplay questions about whether remaining symbols of Chiang, including the memorial hall, statues, and schools and roads named after him would be removed.
Implementing changes can cost money, much like building infrastructure to improve people’s standards of living. It is dangerous and unwise to dismiss a worthy endeavor simply because it cannot be touched and will not lead to material advancement.
For people who are not direct victims of the nation’s authoritarian past, or who were born in the post-authoritarian era, it is easy to shrug off the necessity of removing symbols that portray authoritarianism nostalgically, because they do not bring back painful memories, and past injustices seem far away and unreal.
However, such attitudes reek of hypocrisy considering how often people have rallied calling for the head of perpetrators of heinous crimes. Despite the international trend of abolishing the death penalty, a vast majority of Taiwanese still insist on its use, because they believe in eye-for-an-eye justice.
Imagine how big a backlash the government would draw if it wanted to erect a statue of a man who decapitated a little girl or went on a killing spree. If that idea sounds repulsive, think about what the lives of bereaved families of White Terror victims must have been like for the past decades.
Putting an end to the lingering worship of Chiang is the least the nation as a whole could do to bring long overdue comfort to the many victims of the nation’s authoritarian history.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
RSS