The pursuit of transitional justice in Taiwan has encountered several hurdles, with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) naturally leading the opposition. However, there is one strong hurdle that is harder to tackle: ordinary people who are easily manipulated and put money above values.
In addition to redressing injustices committed during the Martial Law era, another major task for the ad hoc commission for the promotion of transitional justice under the Executive Yuan to be formed after the Act on Promoting Transitional Justice (促進轉型正義條例) was passed on Tuesday last week is the removal of symbols in public buildings and spaces that commemorate or honor Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石).
Calls have been made sporadically to eradicate such symbols, most notably statues of Chiang in public schools and the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei — a 15,000m2 shrine honoring the nation’s most notorious dictator. However, such calls have traditionally mostly been bottom-up initiatives, given that the government did not create a legal basis for the statues’ removal until earlier this month.
Many people have sought to draw attention to the absurdity of continuing to worship Chiang in democratic Taiwan by spraying red paint on his statues on his birthday or anniversaries of White Terror era atrocities, and it is reasonable to say that without these instances of civil disobedience, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration would not have felt confident that it had enough public backing to railroad the act through the Legislative Yuan.
The passage of the act is a new milestone in the nation’s democratization and could further anoint the DPP as the nation’s driver of democratic consolidation. However, the ruling party has found itself faced with piling pressure from authoritarian sympathizers and people who simply do not care about transitional justice, because justice is an intangible value that cannot put food in their stomachs.
Immediately after the act’s passage, some pan-blue news media were quick to estimate the amount of money needed for the implementation of the act, in an apparent attempt to steer public opinion and paint transitional justice as a pointless, money-consuming and politically motivated endeavor.
The tactic seems to be working, given that the DPP administration has tried to downplay questions about whether remaining symbols of Chiang, including the memorial hall, statues, and schools and roads named after him would be removed.
Implementing changes can cost money, much like building infrastructure to improve people’s standards of living. It is dangerous and unwise to dismiss a worthy endeavor simply because it cannot be touched and will not lead to material advancement.
For people who are not direct victims of the nation’s authoritarian past, or who were born in the post-authoritarian era, it is easy to shrug off the necessity of removing symbols that portray authoritarianism nostalgically, because they do not bring back painful memories, and past injustices seem far away and unreal.
However, such attitudes reek of hypocrisy considering how often people have rallied calling for the head of perpetrators of heinous crimes. Despite the international trend of abolishing the death penalty, a vast majority of Taiwanese still insist on its use, because they believe in eye-for-an-eye justice.
Imagine how big a backlash the government would draw if it wanted to erect a statue of a man who decapitated a little girl or went on a killing spree. If that idea sounds repulsive, think about what the lives of bereaved families of White Terror victims must have been like for the past decades.
Putting an end to the lingering worship of Chiang is the least the nation as a whole could do to bring long overdue comfort to the many victims of the nation’s authoritarian history.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS