The pursuit of transitional justice in Taiwan has encountered several hurdles, with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) naturally leading the opposition. However, there is one strong hurdle that is harder to tackle: ordinary people who are easily manipulated and put money above values.
In addition to redressing injustices committed during the Martial Law era, another major task for the ad hoc commission for the promotion of transitional justice under the Executive Yuan to be formed after the Act on Promoting Transitional Justice (促進轉型正義條例) was passed on Tuesday last week is the removal of symbols in public buildings and spaces that commemorate or honor Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石).
Calls have been made sporadically to eradicate such symbols, most notably statues of Chiang in public schools and the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei — a 15,000m2 shrine honoring the nation’s most notorious dictator. However, such calls have traditionally mostly been bottom-up initiatives, given that the government did not create a legal basis for the statues’ removal until earlier this month.
Many people have sought to draw attention to the absurdity of continuing to worship Chiang in democratic Taiwan by spraying red paint on his statues on his birthday or anniversaries of White Terror era atrocities, and it is reasonable to say that without these instances of civil disobedience, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration would not have felt confident that it had enough public backing to railroad the act through the Legislative Yuan.
The passage of the act is a new milestone in the nation’s democratization and could further anoint the DPP as the nation’s driver of democratic consolidation. However, the ruling party has found itself faced with piling pressure from authoritarian sympathizers and people who simply do not care about transitional justice, because justice is an intangible value that cannot put food in their stomachs.
Immediately after the act’s passage, some pan-blue news media were quick to estimate the amount of money needed for the implementation of the act, in an apparent attempt to steer public opinion and paint transitional justice as a pointless, money-consuming and politically motivated endeavor.
The tactic seems to be working, given that the DPP administration has tried to downplay questions about whether remaining symbols of Chiang, including the memorial hall, statues, and schools and roads named after him would be removed.
Implementing changes can cost money, much like building infrastructure to improve people’s standards of living. It is dangerous and unwise to dismiss a worthy endeavor simply because it cannot be touched and will not lead to material advancement.
For people who are not direct victims of the nation’s authoritarian past, or who were born in the post-authoritarian era, it is easy to shrug off the necessity of removing symbols that portray authoritarianism nostalgically, because they do not bring back painful memories, and past injustices seem far away and unreal.
However, such attitudes reek of hypocrisy considering how often people have rallied calling for the head of perpetrators of heinous crimes. Despite the international trend of abolishing the death penalty, a vast majority of Taiwanese still insist on its use, because they believe in eye-for-an-eye justice.
Imagine how big a backlash the government would draw if it wanted to erect a statue of a man who decapitated a little girl or went on a killing spree. If that idea sounds repulsive, think about what the lives of bereaved families of White Terror victims must have been like for the past decades.
Putting an end to the lingering worship of Chiang is the least the nation as a whole could do to bring long overdue comfort to the many victims of the nation’s authoritarian history.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS