Taiwanese human rights advocate Lee Ming-che (李明哲) was last month found guilty of state subversion by a court in Yueyang in China’s Hunan Province. Lee received a five-year custodial sentence and was deprived of his political rights as a “Chinese citizen” for two years.
Article 8 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that “this law may be applicable to foreigners who outside PRC territory commit crimes against the PRC state or against its citizens, provided that this law stipulates a minimum sentence of not less than a three-year fixed term of imprisonment for such crimes; but an exception is to be made if a crime is not punishable according to the law of the place where it was committed.”
However, state subversion is not a crime in most nations, especially those that place a strong emphasis on human rights. In practice, it is difficult for the Chinese authorities to impose Chinese domestic law on foreign citizens residing abroad.
While China continues to insist that Taiwan is part of its sovereign territory, in reality its jurisdiction does not extend to Taiwan. For this reason, Taiwanese residing in Taiwan who express opinions that damage Chinese state power had in the past never been prosecuted, tried and sentenced by a Chinese court.
In 2009, then-president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration signed the Cross-Strait Joint Crime-Fighting and Judicial Mutual Assistance Agreement (海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議) with China, which is founded upon Beijing’s so-called “one China” principle. Despite the existence of this agreement, it is still impossible to deny that both nations’ legal systems are fully independent of each other and Taiwan’s legal system is in no way subservient to China’s. The reality is that China does not have any legal jurisdiction over Taiwan whatsoever.
Lee’s case is unique in that it was the first time that the machinery of China’s legal system crossed this “red line” and used the crime of state subversion against the human rights that a Republic of China (ROC) citizen has in Taiwan, and to not only try and sentence him using the vocabulary of the rule of law, but also to use Article 56 of China’s Criminal Law to deprive an ROC citizen residing in China of his “political rights” there — rights that Lee, as an ROC citizen, never possessed in the first place.
This means that from now on, all Taiwanese who through their words or actions in any way criticize the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) while residing in their own nation can be caught up in China’s legal dragnet for the crime of subverting or inciting damage to Chinese state power.
This means that once an ROC citizen who has previously been critical of the CCP enters Chinese sovereign territory, they will immediately be in danger of being placed under arrest, charged and tried for the crime of state subversion. This will be a frightening prospect for many Taiwanese.
Upholding one’s democratic right to free speech while in Taiwan is now a crime in China, meaning that Taiwan’s quasi-independent status is under threat. Under Chinese law, Taiwanese are now considered to be Chinese citizens: This is a very worrying development.
Wu Ching-chin is an associate professor in Aletheia University’s law department.
Translated by Edward Jones
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS