Chinese authorities have taken a recent blaze in Beijing as a pretext to force out what they term “low-end” elements. What they mean by this is migrant workers with neither Beijing household registration nor a residence permit.
When I lived in Beijing, the city would become a virtual ghost town every Lunar New Year, as these migrant workers returned home for the break. During these times there would be nobody to do the low-paid jobs they normally did. There would be no couriers to deliver things; there would be nobody to clean out blocked sewers. At those times, Beijing residents with high-paid jobs fully appreciated just how indispensable these “low-end” workers were.
I had most contact with these “low-end” workers when I was illegally placed under house arrest. Auxiliary police would be stationed outside my door in eight-hour shifts and sleep at night in the cold corridor among discarded cigarette butts. Regular police were allowed to stay in air-conditioned building management offices and would only have to monitor the surveillance cameras.
These auxiliary cops wore their own clothes: They had no uniform. To me, they did not look a day over 18. When I started talking with them, they said they were from farming families, that they worked for security companies and that they had dropped out of high school and left home to fend for themselves. The police station gave them 100 yuan (US$15.13) per day to stand outside my door to “protect national security.”
I asked them if they knew who I was. They said they did not. I asked them, is this legal? They said they were not concerned whether it was legal: They just wanted the money.
Their attitude toward me changed according to the police’s attitude. When the police were particularly down on me, so would they be. Once, when my wife had a fever, I asked if she could be allowed to go to the hospital, but they just blocked the doorway and would not let us pass.
They mocked us, too, saying: “She can die at home for all we care; we are not letting her leave. One more dead person will not be a problem for China. Somebody will take care of it.”
In the end, a compassionate neighbor called an ambulance for us.
Who knows whether the auxiliary cops that had kept us under surveillance and treated us with such derision were among those the authorities kicked out on this occasion.
A journalist in Beijing got it right when he said: “If you live in China, you tacitly agree to the actions of the dictatorial government and tacitly disavow universal values and economic development, and instead advocate for nationalism, then you are a ‘low-end’ element. If there are failings in the social system, then the individual has no guarantees for their future. It does not matter if you are Xiao Jianhua (蕭建華), Wang Jianlin (王健林) or Huang Guangyu (黃光裕), you are still ‘low-end.’”
How right that is. Who in China is anything other than a “low-end” citizen? Even the other six members of the Chinese Communist Party’s Politburo Standing Committee are not allowed to speak when the TV cameras are trained on them; everyone has to repeat the words of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), delivered in his Beijing dialect.
Some might believe they are high-status, important individuals. It is only when their daughters are molested by military officers protected by the central leadership that they realize just how lowly their status actually is. Those with high-paid positions force out the low-paid migrant workers, the powerful are free to molest the rich. This is the reality in the much-reduced China.
I decided to leave China when I was almost tortured to death. My son, who was not even four years old when we left, has never spent a day of kindergarten in China. Can the secret police who tortured me so severely be so sure that their own children will not be abused in kindergarten?
When all of the low-status workers have been ousted from Beijing, where will the police find the auxiliaries willing to work for peanuts and keep an eye on dissidents for them? This question might well become redundant with Alibaba boss Jack Ma’s (馬雲) big data technology. The auxiliary cops will soon be surplus to requirements.
According to a government work report from Beijing’s Haidian District, which is home to the largest number of migrant workers in the city, the district is to bring in “social capital” and will install facial recognition systems in areas around the district to keep tabs on the number of people in residential areas.
From now on, if you are not registered in that area, even if you are visiting Haidian District in the middle of the night, you will be refused entry by the face recognition system and disposed of like garbage.
Yu Jie is a Chinese dissident writer who lives in exile.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS