Standing outside the gates of the farmhouse from which he was evicted in 2008, white Zimbabwean Deon Theron knows he will never get his land back.
However, he does believe that former Zimbabwean president Robert Mugabe’s fall after almost 40 years in power could lead the new government to encourage white farmers to play a part in reviving the country’s key agricultural sector.
Thousands of white farmers were forced off their land by violent Mugabe-backed mobs or evicted in dubious legal judgements, supposedly to help black people marginalized under British colonial rule.
Illustration: Yusha
However, the farms were often allocated to Mugabe’s allies and fell into ruin, leaving tens of thousands of rural laborers out of work and sending the economy into a tailspin as food production crashed.
“I was evicted after intimidation, violence and court cases,” said Theron, 63, who now runs a guesthouse in Harare, and a dairy processing business.
“I don’t expect my land to be returned, but I do think the government will explore getting people who have the skills back on the farms — and that means younger people from evicted families,” Theron said.
Days after Mugabe’s fall on Nov. 21, Theron took reporters back to Zanka, the 400-hectare farm that he bought in 1984, and where he built his own house and lived for 24 years with his wife, raising three children.
“It was given to a top official in the reserve bank,” he said, looking through the locked wire fence at the house and abandoned tennis court in Beatrice, Mashonaland East province, two hours south of Harare.
“I blocked out a lot of memories and have tried to move on,” he added, close to tears as he recalled how his foreman was beaten to death in 2005, apparently while in police custody during the height of the evictions.
Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa, who came to power late last month after the military forced Mugabe to resign, is a veteran hardliner from the ruling ZANU-PF party.
However, he does not appear to share Mugabe’s ideological hatred of white farmers and has prioritized agriculture to revive the moribund economy.
Mnangagwa used his inaugural speech to stress that the land seizures would not be reversed, vowing instead to compensate evicted farmers and to put the vast tracts of idle land back into production.
“My government is committed to compensating those farmers from whom land was taken,” he said, pledging to “ensure that all land is utilized optimally.”
Agriculture is “central to national stability and to sustained economic recovery,” he added.
Heidi Visagie, who was evicted in 2012 from a farm she and her husband bought from the government outside the central town of Chegutu, said that Mnangagwa’s rise offered “a glimmer of hope.”
“The new president is a practical businessman, so we are cautiously optimistic,” she said.
As Zimbabwean vice president, Mnangagwa oversaw Mugabe’s “command agriculture” policy of recent years, designed to tackle severe food shortages.
Two sources told reporters that, under the policy, Mnangagwa had quietly encouraged evicted white farmers to lease new land — as long as they did not return to their old farms.
“Farmers want the opportunity to farm,” said Visagie, 45, whose business used to employ 300 workers growing asters and other flowers for export to the Netherlands.
“Our workers all lost their homes and the school for their children. We drive past and see the greenhouses smashed and the water pumps all sold,” she said.
Zimbabwe was known as the breadbasket of southern Africa in the early years of Mugabe’s rule after independence from Britain in 1980.
However, starting in 2000, about 4,500 farms were seized with the approval of Mugabe in a furious reaction to white landowners increasingly backing the Movement for Democratic Change opposition party.
Just a few hundred white farmers are still in business and agricultural output fell from US$2.9 billion in 2001 to US$880 million in 2008, according to the World Bank.
On his return visit last week, land that Theron used to cultivate with a tractor decades ago was being ploughed by ox.
The number of functioning tractors has dropped from 25,000 in 1996 to only 5,000 now, according to Zimbabwe’s Agricultural Dealers and Manufactures Association.
Association chairman Marco Garizio said that he drew encouragement from his regular past meetings with Mnangagwa.
“He owns farms himself that he runs reasonably successfully,” Garizio said. “I don’t say that he will be a champion of ‘white farmers,’ but he will definitely be a champion of getting production going again and allowing qualified farmers to be able function properly.”
“We still have the nucleus of farmers in this country to recover to an extent,” he said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS