Standing outside the gates of the farmhouse from which he was evicted in 2008, white Zimbabwean Deon Theron knows he will never get his land back.
However, he does believe that former Zimbabwean president Robert Mugabe’s fall after almost 40 years in power could lead the new government to encourage white farmers to play a part in reviving the country’s key agricultural sector.
Thousands of white farmers were forced off their land by violent Mugabe-backed mobs or evicted in dubious legal judgements, supposedly to help black people marginalized under British colonial rule.
Illustration: Yusha
However, the farms were often allocated to Mugabe’s allies and fell into ruin, leaving tens of thousands of rural laborers out of work and sending the economy into a tailspin as food production crashed.
“I was evicted after intimidation, violence and court cases,” said Theron, 63, who now runs a guesthouse in Harare, and a dairy processing business.
“I don’t expect my land to be returned, but I do think the government will explore getting people who have the skills back on the farms — and that means younger people from evicted families,” Theron said.
Days after Mugabe’s fall on Nov. 21, Theron took reporters back to Zanka, the 400-hectare farm that he bought in 1984, and where he built his own house and lived for 24 years with his wife, raising three children.
“It was given to a top official in the reserve bank,” he said, looking through the locked wire fence at the house and abandoned tennis court in Beatrice, Mashonaland East province, two hours south of Harare.
“I blocked out a lot of memories and have tried to move on,” he added, close to tears as he recalled how his foreman was beaten to death in 2005, apparently while in police custody during the height of the evictions.
Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa, who came to power late last month after the military forced Mugabe to resign, is a veteran hardliner from the ruling ZANU-PF party.
However, he does not appear to share Mugabe’s ideological hatred of white farmers and has prioritized agriculture to revive the moribund economy.
Mnangagwa used his inaugural speech to stress that the land seizures would not be reversed, vowing instead to compensate evicted farmers and to put the vast tracts of idle land back into production.
“My government is committed to compensating those farmers from whom land was taken,” he said, pledging to “ensure that all land is utilized optimally.”
Agriculture is “central to national stability and to sustained economic recovery,” he added.
Heidi Visagie, who was evicted in 2012 from a farm she and her husband bought from the government outside the central town of Chegutu, said that Mnangagwa’s rise offered “a glimmer of hope.”
“The new president is a practical businessman, so we are cautiously optimistic,” she said.
As Zimbabwean vice president, Mnangagwa oversaw Mugabe’s “command agriculture” policy of recent years, designed to tackle severe food shortages.
Two sources told reporters that, under the policy, Mnangagwa had quietly encouraged evicted white farmers to lease new land — as long as they did not return to their old farms.
“Farmers want the opportunity to farm,” said Visagie, 45, whose business used to employ 300 workers growing asters and other flowers for export to the Netherlands.
“Our workers all lost their homes and the school for their children. We drive past and see the greenhouses smashed and the water pumps all sold,” she said.
Zimbabwe was known as the breadbasket of southern Africa in the early years of Mugabe’s rule after independence from Britain in 1980.
However, starting in 2000, about 4,500 farms were seized with the approval of Mugabe in a furious reaction to white landowners increasingly backing the Movement for Democratic Change opposition party.
Just a few hundred white farmers are still in business and agricultural output fell from US$2.9 billion in 2001 to US$880 million in 2008, according to the World Bank.
On his return visit last week, land that Theron used to cultivate with a tractor decades ago was being ploughed by ox.
The number of functioning tractors has dropped from 25,000 in 1996 to only 5,000 now, according to Zimbabwe’s Agricultural Dealers and Manufactures Association.
Association chairman Marco Garizio said that he drew encouragement from his regular past meetings with Mnangagwa.
“He owns farms himself that he runs reasonably successfully,” Garizio said. “I don’t say that he will be a champion of ‘white farmers,’ but he will definitely be a champion of getting production going again and allowing qualified farmers to be able function properly.”
“We still have the nucleus of farmers in this country to recover to an extent,” he said.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS