Large tracts of the US’ east coast heritage are at risk from being wiped out by rising oceans that are set to threaten thousands of archaeological and historic sites, according to new research.
Even a modest increase in sea level will imperil much of the southeastern US’ heritage by the end of the century, researchers found, with a 1m increase threatening 13,000 sites.
Thousands more areas will be in danger as the seas continue to climb in the years beyond this, forcing the potential relocation of the White House and Lincoln Memorial in Washington DC and inundation of historic touchstones such as the Kennedy Space Center and St Augustine, Florida, which lays claim to being the oldest city in the US.
“There are going to be a lot of cultural sites lost and the record of humanity’s history will be put at risk. Some sites will be destroyed; some buried in marshes. We might be able to relocate some. In some places it will be devastating. We need to properly understand the magnitude of this,” said David Anderson, a University of Tennessee anthropologist who led the published research.
Threatened areas, including locations on the national register of historic places, include Native American sites that date back more than 10,000 years, as well as early colonial settlements such as Jamestown, Virginia, and Charleston, South Carolina.
Researchers pinpointed known sites using topographical data and analyzed how they would fare in various sea level rise scenarios.
Florida, which has a southern portion particularly vulnerable to sea level rise, has the most sites in danger from a 1m rise, followed by Louisiana and Virginia.
A 1m sea level rise by 2100 could prove optimistic, with several studies showing the increase could be much greater. Scientists have warned that the breakup of the Antarctic ice sheet could significantly fuel sea level rise, pushing the global increase to about 1.8m by 2100.
The latest US government estimate predicts a worldwide increase of 0.3m to 1.2m by 2100, although a 2.4m rise cannot be ruled out it said.
The eastern seaboard of the US is at particular risk, with water infringing on the coast in greater volumes than the global average. The problem is compounded by areas of the coast, such as in New Jersey and Virginia, gradually subsiding due to a long-term geological hangover from a vast ice sheet that once covered much of North America.
Sea level rise is expected to displace millions of people from the US coasts over the coming decades, with Anderson saying that this will create further damage to heritage sites as people move inland.
There is still some uncertainty over the exact timescale involved in the changes — it might take several hundred years for some coastal places to be at risk — leading to hopes that coastlines can be adapted in time in order to protect vital infrastructure and sacred sites, he said, adding that losses appear inevitable.
“Putting a sea wall around the whole of the US won’t be an easy thing to do and would cause a lot of damage elsewhere. We are going to have to do a lot of planning as a civilization in the next 50 to 100 years and we have to take heritage into account,” Anderson said.
Coastal heritage has been lost by previous fluctuations in sea level rise and tough decisions will need to be made as to what to protect in the future, said Harold Wanless, chair of the Department of Geological Sciences at the University of Miami, who was not involved in the study.
“We will have to look at how much effort we expend saving these sites over more practical things such as critical infrastructure or developing new agriculture resources. Our human history is important but there are a lot of new things to focus on. They will all need time and effort,” Wanless said.
Human-driven climate change is already creating its own historical artifacts, with around a dozen towns in Alaska set to be abandoned or relocated due to rising sea levels and diminishing sea ice. In Louisiana, a community near New Orleans received federal funding last year to relocate because much of their low-lying land has disappeared.
The US Geological Survey’s Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center director, Rob Thieler, said: “It’s going to be an important choice for government. There’s land that is becoming uninhabitable right now and we’ve seen from the hurricanes this year that people have to leave not just from the flooding but because infrastructure and services become unreliable.”
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then