EVs no miracle solution
Premier William Lai (賴清德) has just proposed to ban all fossil fuel-powered vehicles to reduce air pollution (“Lai proposes ban on all fossil fuel-powered vehicles,” Nov. 30, page 3).
What some European nations and China are doing to replace gasoline and diesel-powered cars, and scooters with electric vehicles (EVs) is not necessarily correct. Japan is promoting hydrogen cars and this also deserves further evaluation. Taiwan should think before it jumps.
Switching from gasoline and diesel to electricity makes sense if the electricity that will power the vehicles is strictly generated from solar cells and natural gas.
Electricity generated from coal, oil or nuclear fuel cannot be used for vehicles, as the first two would increase the overall pollution, including carbon dioxide emissions, and the last one is to be eliminated in Taiwan anyway.
Both electric and hydrogen cars can reduce pollutants practically down to zero — locally and temporarily — compared with gasoline and diesel cars. However, the local air will not remain clean for long when the increased load causes coal or oil-fired power plants with ordinary air pollution control to generate more pollutants that will spread nationally and globally.
This is why one-third of air pollutants in Taiwan originates from other nations, mainly China.
If another one-third of air pollutants is from factory and power plant emissions, it might be less costly to update air pollution control devices at large plants than to ban all gasoline and diesel vehicles.
Electric cars in an electricity-hungry Taiwan without nuclear energy might not be feasible.
Hydrogen in Japan is mostly produced from natural gas (imported as liquefied natural gas, or LNG), creating mainly nitrogen oxides and carbon dioxide. Nitrogen oxides can be reduced catalytically by more than 90 percent with a commercial selective reduction process using ammonia.
Natural gas vehicles would be better than electric vehicles or even hydrogen cars if reducing carbon dioxide emissions is also a goal. Like Japan, Taiwan also imports LNG.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Out of the bubble
A member of the public recently posed this question to Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲): What is a reasonable salary for a young person?
Ko replied that NT$30,000 is too low and that he believes that between NT$45,000 and NT$50,000 would be reasonable.
Ko’s answer demonstrates that he is seriously out of touch with reality.
According to statistics from the Ministry of Labor, last year’s average monthly starting salary for workers in the manufacturing and service industries was NT$22,221 for a junior high-school graduate, NT$23,313 for a senior high-school graduate and NT$25,198 for a graduate of a technical or vocational college.
Average starting salaries for university graduates increased to NT$28,116 and master’s degree holders’ average starting salaries were NT$33,313.
Last year, the overall average starting salary in Taiwan was NT$26,723. This figure is miles away from Ko’s NT$45,000.
As for average monthly starting salaries for civil servants at regular government ministries or civil administration departments, entry-level civil servants on average earned NT$29,345 last year, basic-level civil servants made NT$36,275 and advanced-level civil servants received NT$46,225.
After deducting approximately NT$1,000 per month in social security contributions and pension fund contributions, average take-home pay for civil servants fell well below Ko’s NT$45,000 figure last year.
Low salaries are common in all trades, professions and industries in Taiwan.
If those in government genuinely want to improve the situation, they must first properly understand the actual state of affairs as it exists “on the ground” and understand the reasons behind Taiwan’s low-salary problem.
They need to look beyond their peers and step outside the bubble in which they live.
They need to realize that making speeches and voicing vague hopes will do nothing to solve the problem.
Chen Ping-chou
Yunlin County
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS