EVs no miracle solution
Premier William Lai (賴清德) has just proposed to ban all fossil fuel-powered vehicles to reduce air pollution (“Lai proposes ban on all fossil fuel-powered vehicles,” Nov. 30, page 3).
What some European nations and China are doing to replace gasoline and diesel-powered cars, and scooters with electric vehicles (EVs) is not necessarily correct. Japan is promoting hydrogen cars and this also deserves further evaluation. Taiwan should think before it jumps.
Switching from gasoline and diesel to electricity makes sense if the electricity that will power the vehicles is strictly generated from solar cells and natural gas.
Electricity generated from coal, oil or nuclear fuel cannot be used for vehicles, as the first two would increase the overall pollution, including carbon dioxide emissions, and the last one is to be eliminated in Taiwan anyway.
Both electric and hydrogen cars can reduce pollutants practically down to zero — locally and temporarily — compared with gasoline and diesel cars. However, the local air will not remain clean for long when the increased load causes coal or oil-fired power plants with ordinary air pollution control to generate more pollutants that will spread nationally and globally.
This is why one-third of air pollutants in Taiwan originates from other nations, mainly China.
If another one-third of air pollutants is from factory and power plant emissions, it might be less costly to update air pollution control devices at large plants than to ban all gasoline and diesel vehicles.
Electric cars in an electricity-hungry Taiwan without nuclear energy might not be feasible.
Hydrogen in Japan is mostly produced from natural gas (imported as liquefied natural gas, or LNG), creating mainly nitrogen oxides and carbon dioxide. Nitrogen oxides can be reduced catalytically by more than 90 percent with a commercial selective reduction process using ammonia.
Natural gas vehicles would be better than electric vehicles or even hydrogen cars if reducing carbon dioxide emissions is also a goal. Like Japan, Taiwan also imports LNG.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Out of the bubble
A member of the public recently posed this question to Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲): What is a reasonable salary for a young person?
Ko replied that NT$30,000 is too low and that he believes that between NT$45,000 and NT$50,000 would be reasonable.
Ko’s answer demonstrates that he is seriously out of touch with reality.
According to statistics from the Ministry of Labor, last year’s average monthly starting salary for workers in the manufacturing and service industries was NT$22,221 for a junior high-school graduate, NT$23,313 for a senior high-school graduate and NT$25,198 for a graduate of a technical or vocational college.
Average starting salaries for university graduates increased to NT$28,116 and master’s degree holders’ average starting salaries were NT$33,313.
Last year, the overall average starting salary in Taiwan was NT$26,723. This figure is miles away from Ko’s NT$45,000.
As for average monthly starting salaries for civil servants at regular government ministries or civil administration departments, entry-level civil servants on average earned NT$29,345 last year, basic-level civil servants made NT$36,275 and advanced-level civil servants received NT$46,225.
After deducting approximately NT$1,000 per month in social security contributions and pension fund contributions, average take-home pay for civil servants fell well below Ko’s NT$45,000 figure last year.
Low salaries are common in all trades, professions and industries in Taiwan.
If those in government genuinely want to improve the situation, they must first properly understand the actual state of affairs as it exists “on the ground” and understand the reasons behind Taiwan’s low-salary problem.
They need to look beyond their peers and step outside the bubble in which they live.
They need to realize that making speeches and voicing vague hopes will do nothing to solve the problem.
Chen Ping-chou
Yunlin County
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS