Weeks ahead of the expected completion of a UN database of companies that operate in Israel’s West Bank settlements, Israel and the administration of US President Donald Trump are working feverishly to prevent its publication.
While Israel is usually quick to brush off UN criticism, officials have said that they are taking the so-called “blacklist” seriously, fearing its publication could have devastating consequences by driving companies away, deterring others from investing and prompting investors to dump shares of Israeli firms.
Dozens of major Israeli companies, as well as multinationals that do business in Israel, are expected to appear on the list.
“We will do everything we can to ensure that this list does not see the light of day,” Israeli Permanent Representative to the UN Danny Danon said.
The UN Human Rights Council in March last year ordered the compilation of the database, calling on UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Raad al-Hussein to “investigate the implications of the Israeli settlements on Palestinians.”
The international community overwhelmingly considers the settlements, built on occupied land claimed by the Palestinians for a future state, to be illegal.
Israel rejects such claims, citing the land’s strategic and religious significance, and has said the matter should be resolved in negotiations.
Israeli officials have said that about 100 local companies that operate in the West Bank and east Jerusalem have received warning letters that they will be on the list.
In addition, about 50 international companies, mostly from the US and Europe, also have been warned.
The companies have not been publicly identified, but one official said they include Israeli banks, supermarkets, restaurant chains, bus lines and security firms, as well as international giants that provide equipment or services used to build or maintain settlements.
The official spoke on condition of anonymity, because he was not authorized to discuss the matter with the media.
The only company to confirm receiving a warning letter has been Bezeq, Israel’s national telephone company.
Bezeq CEO Stella Handler in September posted a copy of the letter sent by Zeid’s office on Facebook. It accused Bezeq of using West Bank land for infrastructure, providing telephone and Internet services to settlements and operating sales offices in the West Bank and east Jerusalem.
Handler wrote that Bezeq provides service to all clients, regardless of race or where they live.
“The council’s bias against Israel is so extreme that it has lost all relevance in the world,” she wrote. “We will not cooperate with a move that is all in all anti-Israeli propaganda.”
However, hours later, Handler removed the post, saying that she had done so at the request of the government.
The Israeli official confirmed that the government has asked companies not to speak about the issue.
Bezeq declined to comment.
Israel has long accused the UN, particularly the rights council, of being biased against it.
Israel is the only nation that faces an examination of its rights record at each of the council’s three sessions each year. About 70 resolutions, or about one-quarter of the council’s country-specific resolutions, have been aimed at Israel. That is nearly triple the number for the second-place nation, Syria, where hundreds of thousands have been killed in a devastating six-year civil war.
Israeli leaders and many non-governmental groups have also complained that some of the world’s worst violators of human rights, including Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Cuba, sit on the council.
Some Western diplomats have said the database could set a harmful precedent by blurring the line between business and human rights on issues that are better left to trade policy than the Geneva, Switzerland-based council.
Israel seems to have little leverage over the council, but its campaign has received a big boost from the US.
The Trump administration has taken a tough line against the UN, demanding reforms and last month withdrawing from cultural agency UNESCO because of alleged anti-Israel bias.
In a speech to the council in June, US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley railed against its makeup and demanded that Israel be removed as a permanent fixture on its agenda.
She also hinted that the US could quit the council.
The upcoming release of the database could test that commitment. It has triggered a quiet, but high-stakes effort by Israel and the US to try to block its release.
“We just view that type of blacklist as counterproductive,” US Department of State spokeswoman Heather Nauert said.
Danon accused the council of unfairly targeting Israel at a time of conflict throughout the world, saying that it amounted to a “blacklist” of Jewish companies and those that do business with the Jewish state.
He also said it would turn the rights council into “the world’s biggest promoter of BDS,” an acronym for the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, a grassroots international boycott movement against Israel.
Most of the companies linked to the blacklist are frequent targets of the BDS movement.
“What kind of message will this send?” Dannon said.
However, senior Palestinian official Nabil Shaath said the list is an “important step” moving from verbal condemnation to practical action against the settlements and expressed hope that it would lead companies to stop doing business with the settlements and even lead to sanctions against those that continue.
The original resolution calling for the list stipulates only that the council’s high commissioner is requested “to transmit the data therein in the form of a report” to the council.
To that end, Israel and its allies have been encouraging the council to leave the list out and submit only a basic, broad-strokes report that does not name names, several UN diplomats familiar with the discussions said.
The diplomats were not authorized to comment publicly and demanded anonymity.
The pressure campaign has shown some signs of success.
After an earlier delay, Zeid’s office said the release of the “report” has been pushed back again, from next month to early next year.
For now, it does not appear that the list’s publication would be the direct trigger that leads the US to quit the council.
Haley’s office said it is focused on implementing reforms on the council, although publication of the list could make US participation “less likely.”
Eugene Kontorovich, director of international law at the Kohelet Policy Forum, a conservative think tank in Jerusalem, said he was “deeply skeptical” that the report would not be published, adding that the Israeli government would be better off trying to discredit the report ahead of time.
“I think it’s important for people to understand how bad this is,” he said.
The resolution would cause “reputational harm” to companies and put “a cloud over business in Israel,” he said.
Although nonbinding, he said it could be used as a basis for future legal action.
“The goal of this is to cause problems for Israel,” he said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS