Weeks ahead of the expected completion of a UN database of companies that operate in Israel’s West Bank settlements, Israel and the administration of US President Donald Trump are working feverishly to prevent its publication.
While Israel is usually quick to brush off UN criticism, officials have said that they are taking the so-called “blacklist” seriously, fearing its publication could have devastating consequences by driving companies away, deterring others from investing and prompting investors to dump shares of Israeli firms.
Dozens of major Israeli companies, as well as multinationals that do business in Israel, are expected to appear on the list.
“We will do everything we can to ensure that this list does not see the light of day,” Israeli Permanent Representative to the UN Danny Danon said.
The UN Human Rights Council in March last year ordered the compilation of the database, calling on UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Raad al-Hussein to “investigate the implications of the Israeli settlements on Palestinians.”
The international community overwhelmingly considers the settlements, built on occupied land claimed by the Palestinians for a future state, to be illegal.
Israel rejects such claims, citing the land’s strategic and religious significance, and has said the matter should be resolved in negotiations.
Israeli officials have said that about 100 local companies that operate in the West Bank and east Jerusalem have received warning letters that they will be on the list.
In addition, about 50 international companies, mostly from the US and Europe, also have been warned.
The companies have not been publicly identified, but one official said they include Israeli banks, supermarkets, restaurant chains, bus lines and security firms, as well as international giants that provide equipment or services used to build or maintain settlements.
The official spoke on condition of anonymity, because he was not authorized to discuss the matter with the media.
The only company to confirm receiving a warning letter has been Bezeq, Israel’s national telephone company.
Bezeq CEO Stella Handler in September posted a copy of the letter sent by Zeid’s office on Facebook. It accused Bezeq of using West Bank land for infrastructure, providing telephone and Internet services to settlements and operating sales offices in the West Bank and east Jerusalem.
Handler wrote that Bezeq provides service to all clients, regardless of race or where they live.
“The council’s bias against Israel is so extreme that it has lost all relevance in the world,” she wrote. “We will not cooperate with a move that is all in all anti-Israeli propaganda.”
However, hours later, Handler removed the post, saying that she had done so at the request of the government.
The Israeli official confirmed that the government has asked companies not to speak about the issue.
Bezeq declined to comment.
Israel has long accused the UN, particularly the rights council, of being biased against it.
Israel is the only nation that faces an examination of its rights record at each of the council’s three sessions each year. About 70 resolutions, or about one-quarter of the council’s country-specific resolutions, have been aimed at Israel. That is nearly triple the number for the second-place nation, Syria, where hundreds of thousands have been killed in a devastating six-year civil war.
Israeli leaders and many non-governmental groups have also complained that some of the world’s worst violators of human rights, including Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Cuba, sit on the council.
Some Western diplomats have said the database could set a harmful precedent by blurring the line between business and human rights on issues that are better left to trade policy than the Geneva, Switzerland-based council.
Israel seems to have little leverage over the council, but its campaign has received a big boost from the US.
The Trump administration has taken a tough line against the UN, demanding reforms and last month withdrawing from cultural agency UNESCO because of alleged anti-Israel bias.
In a speech to the council in June, US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley railed against its makeup and demanded that Israel be removed as a permanent fixture on its agenda.
She also hinted that the US could quit the council.
The upcoming release of the database could test that commitment. It has triggered a quiet, but high-stakes effort by Israel and the US to try to block its release.
“We just view that type of blacklist as counterproductive,” US Department of State spokeswoman Heather Nauert said.
Danon accused the council of unfairly targeting Israel at a time of conflict throughout the world, saying that it amounted to a “blacklist” of Jewish companies and those that do business with the Jewish state.
He also said it would turn the rights council into “the world’s biggest promoter of BDS,” an acronym for the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, a grassroots international boycott movement against Israel.
Most of the companies linked to the blacklist are frequent targets of the BDS movement.
“What kind of message will this send?” Dannon said.
However, senior Palestinian official Nabil Shaath said the list is an “important step” moving from verbal condemnation to practical action against the settlements and expressed hope that it would lead companies to stop doing business with the settlements and even lead to sanctions against those that continue.
The original resolution calling for the list stipulates only that the council’s high commissioner is requested “to transmit the data therein in the form of a report” to the council.
To that end, Israel and its allies have been encouraging the council to leave the list out and submit only a basic, broad-strokes report that does not name names, several UN diplomats familiar with the discussions said.
The diplomats were not authorized to comment publicly and demanded anonymity.
The pressure campaign has shown some signs of success.
After an earlier delay, Zeid’s office said the release of the “report” has been pushed back again, from next month to early next year.
For now, it does not appear that the list’s publication would be the direct trigger that leads the US to quit the council.
Haley’s office said it is focused on implementing reforms on the council, although publication of the list could make US participation “less likely.”
Eugene Kontorovich, director of international law at the Kohelet Policy Forum, a conservative think tank in Jerusalem, said he was “deeply skeptical” that the report would not be published, adding that the Israeli government would be better off trying to discredit the report ahead of time.
“I think it’s important for people to understand how bad this is,” he said.
The resolution would cause “reputational harm” to companies and put “a cloud over business in Israel,” he said.
Although nonbinding, he said it could be used as a basis for future legal action.
“The goal of this is to cause problems for Israel,” he said.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS