With autonomous cars and factories already a reality, it seems that unstaffed stores will inevitably be a part of Taiwan’s future. This week, President Chain Store Corp, which runs 7-Eleven, announced that it would be opening cashier-free stores as early as the first half of next year.
The process is not as easy as it sounds — mention unstaffed stores and shoplifting immediately comes to mind. Banking on people’s honesty can only be conducted as a social experiment and not a corporate venture, as evidenced by the case of an “honesty store” in Taipei that suffered major losses earlier this year due to theft.
This is where technology comes into play to track items and ensure people pay before they leave. However, Amazon.com’s cashier-free venture in Seattle is more than 10 months past its scheduled opening due to technical issues. There have been successful cases in China, but most are still in the experimental phase and are not without glitches.
President Chain Store cited the stores as a way to deal with a projected labor shortage. This does not mean eliminating all staff — there will still need to be people to stock shelves, clean up messes, identify damaged or expired goods and deal with unruly customers. How much money it can save remains to be determined, but will the firm lower the cost of its products or raise the pay of its remaining employees, or will it gobble up all the extra profits? Maybe that should not be a question at all.
Some like to cite increasing wages and labor laws for the creation of unstaffed stores — but that really is not valid, because Taiwanese salaries are still painfully low in relation to the cost of living in big cities. More money means more purchasing power, which benefits the stores in the long run — it just seems that nobody thinks this way here.
One benefit for employees is that instead of performing mostly mindless work, they get to learn and operate a new system and use technology that could be the norm in the future. They will have to think about the bigger picture instead of their individual tasks, and learn how to balance human and machine tasks even further than what they are doing today. However, this is only if the company is willing to train those willing to learn. Perhaps those in traditional shops who want to learn can swap places with those in automated stores who do not — but there will inevitably be some who fall through the cracks.
For customers, the appeal of these stores is likely to be the elimination of waiting for cashiers. At a time when everything needs to be instantaneous, this is sure to be a hit with the extremely impatient crowd. Some might lament the loss of face-to-face service — but these days, who stops to chat with the cashier? Most are reduced to item-scanning robots when they operate the cash register. With staff freed from cashier duty, they might even have more opportunities to find other ways to interact with customers.
It really depends on the technology and how firms plan to make this work — perhaps it will have to be a Costco-type establishment where only verified members are allowed inside. Potential hassles will be having to sign in and needing to have a smartphone at all times. What about older people who do not know how to use smartphones? Even if shoplifting is eliminated, people might vandalize the store or mess with shelves. There seem to be more questions than answers.
However, it is a worthwhile experiment. With the sheer density of convenience stores, grocery stores and mom-and-pop shops in Taiwan, it would not hurt to convert some to give people different options and experiences. After all, if a consumer does not like an unstaffed store, they can most likely find another store within walking distance. This is still a novelty and who knows if automated stores will become the norm?
Do not panic just yet — unstaffed stores are not taking over any time soon, and when they do, you might be used to them already.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS