Last week, Zimbabwe’s generals took then-president Robert Mugabe into custody in an effective coup — though they insist on not calling it that. Days later, the ruling party, the Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF), moved to expel the 93-year-old president from its ranks.
However, it might not have been Mugabe himself, the quintessential “big man” leader, who catalyzed this revolt, despite the ruthlessness that has characterized his nearly four-decade rule. Quite the contrary, it might have been Mugabe’s possible successor: his wife, Grace.
In the past couple of years, the 52-year-old Grace Mugabe has become increasingly active politically, even declaring her hope to succeed her husband. Just a week before the coup, Mugabe sacked his deputy, Emmerson Mnangagwa, to promote Grace to that position.
According to new research by Theresa Schroeder of Radford University and Jonathan Powell of the University of Central Florida, female heads of state are more likely to provoke military coups in countries where armies are powerful enough to stage them.
The paper cites several examples of attempted coups against female leaders.
For example, Corazon Aquino, the first female president of the Philippines, survived four coup attempts.
Benazir Bhutto was not just Pakistan’s first female prime minister; she was the first woman to lead a democratic government in a Muslim-majority country. In 1995, she also faced a coup attempt — which was ultimately foiled — by renegade military officers.
One possible explanation for this tendency is that female leaders can be viewed as direct threats to the interests of the generals, because women are more likely to favor, say, reduced military spending and less pugnacious policies, Schroeder and Powell said.
Aquino indeed took a more diplomatic approach to dealing with rebels in the Philippines than her country’s military command advocated.
Another reason why female leaders might be more likely to attract coups is the belief, conscious or unconscious, that a woman in charge must have obtained her post through family or marital connections. She was not actually tough enough, in other words, to get to the top on her own.
As Schroeder and Powell said, this reading is not entirely baseless: In some parts of the world, female leaders have disproportionately obtained office through familial ties.
One survey they cite found that 33 percent of female leaders in office from 1960 to 2007 had family ties to prominent politicians.
However, there are vast regional disparities, with familial ties most likely to drive female leaders to the top in Latin America and Asia — regions with low gender equality overall and little respect for women’s rights. In fact, until recently, the only women who had become heads of state in Latin American countries were daughters or wives of political leaders.
None of this is to say that gender provides a decisive, much less comprehensive, explanation for a coup.
As Powell said, many women fought Zimbabwe’s independence in the Rhodesian Bush War. Among that war’s female veterans was Joice Mujuru, who later served as vice president for a decade, ostensibly without having her competence challenged by the military.
Ironically, Mujuru was once viewed as a potential successor to Mugabe, but she was censured in 2014 for purportedly plotting against him — allegations that cost her both her post as vice president and her position in the ZANU-PF leadership.
Gender might also play a role when it comes to executing a coup. Planning a successful coup requires a significant degree of instrumental reasoning — that is, the tendency to use other people as tools to advance one’s own goals.
According to new study, this “Machiavellian” tendency — which encompasses the intention and ability to use manipulative tactics, a cynical view of human nature and a disregard for conventional morality — may manifest differently in men and women.
The new research, which took into account the results of three studies, suggests that men who exhibit a high degree of Machiavellianism tend to be self-aggrandizing, boisterous and vain, with an exploitative approach to relationships and an opportunistic world view. Machiavellian women, by contrast, may be defensive, anxious and introverted.
The study concludes that men might be more likely to engage in assertive and violent forms of manipulation, while women might resort to covert, restrained and concealed deceptive tactics, such as rumors and gossiping.
Because power reflects perception, rival coup leaders ruthlessly manipulate potential enemies and collaborators. Yet they may not realize how gender bias is shaping their own strategies. Sometimes, it is this psychology that explains an unexpected fall from grace.
In Zimbabwe, as in all coups, much behind-the-scenes plotting continues to take place, but who the eventual winners and losers are might depend, among other things, on the gender of the plotters.
Peter Bruggen and Raj Persaud are psychiatrists based in London.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS